1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo

Volume 67, Issue 2

sp. nov., an actinomycete isolated from rhizosphere of L. Free

Abstract

A Gram-stain-positive, aerobic actinobacterial strain (designated SYP-A7299), which displayed a rod–coccus growth lifecycle, was isolated from the rhizosphere of L. Phylogenetic analyses based on 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that strain SYP-A7299 belongs to the genus and is most closely related to JSM 078085 (97.4 % 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity). The DNA–DNA relatedness value between strain SYP-A7299 and JSM 078085 was 37 % ±2.9. The cell-wall peptidoglycan was A4α, and glucose and galactose were whole-cell sugars. The polar lipids consisted of diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylinositol, two glycolipids and an unknown polar lipid. The major menaquinone were MK-8(H) (72 %) and MK-9(H) (28 %), and the predominant cellular fatty acids were anteiso-C , iso-C and anteiso-C . The DNA G+C content was 68.9 mol%. Based on the morphological, physiological, biochemical and chemotaxonomic characters presented in this study, strain SYP-A7299 represents a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is SYP-A7299 (=DSM 100491=KCTC 39 592).

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): 16S rRNA gene sequencing , Arthrobacter ginkgonis sp. nov. and Ginkgo biloba L.
© 2017 IUMS
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001623
2017-02-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/67/2/319.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001623&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Conn HJ, Dimmick I. Soil bacteria similar in morphology to Mycobacterium and Corynebacterium. J Bacteriol 1947; 54:291–303[PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Koch C, Schumann P, Stackebrandt E. Reclassification of Micrococcus agilis (Ali-Cohen 1889) to the genus Arthrobacter as Arthrobacter agilis comb. nov. and emendation of the genus Arthrobacter. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1995; 45:837–839 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Schleifer KH, Kandler O. Peptidoglycan types of bacterial cell walls and their taxonomic implications. Bacteriol Rev 1972; 36:407–477[PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Stackebrandt E, Fowler VJ, Fiedler F, Seiler H. Taxonomic studies on Arthrobacter nicotianae and related taxa: description of Arthrobacter uratoxydans sp. nov. and Arthrobacter sulfureus sp. nov. and reclassification of Brevibacterium protophormiae as Arthrobacter protophormiae comb. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 1983; 4:470–486 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Keddie RM, Collins MD, Jones D. Genus Arthrobacter Conn and Dimmick 1947, 300AL. In Sneath PHA, Mair NS, Sharpe ME, Holt JG. (editors) Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology vol. 2 Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1986
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Jones D, Keddie RM. The genus Arthrobacter. In Balows A, Trüper HG, Dworkin M, Harder W, Schleifer KH. et al (editors) The Prokaryotes: A Handbook on the Biology of Bacteria: Ecophysiology, Isolation, Identification, Applications, 2nd ed. vol. 2 New York: Springer; 1992 pp. 1283–1299
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Cui XL, Mao PH, Zeng M, Li WJ, Zhang LP et al. Streptimonospora salina gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the family Nocardiopsaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:357–363 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Li WJ, Xu P, Schumann P, Zhang YQ, Pukall R et al. Georgenia ruanii sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium isolated from forest soil in Yunnan (China), and emended description of the genus Georgenia. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1424–1428 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Kim OS, Cho YJ, Lee K, Yoon SH, Kim M et al. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:716–721 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425[PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M et al. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 2011; 28:2731–2739 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:4876–4882 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Ezaki T, Hashimoto Y, Yabuuchi E. Fluorometric deoxyribonucleic acid-deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization in microdilution wells as an alternative to membrane filter hybridization in which radioisotopes are used to determine genetic relatedness among bacterial strains. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989; 39:224–229 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Mesbah M, Premachandran U, Whitman WB. Precise measurement of the G+C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989; 39:159–167 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O et al. International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987; 37:463–464 [CrossRef]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Busse H-J, Wieser M, Buczolits S. Genus III Arthrobacter Conn & Dimmick 1947, 301AL emend. Koch, Schumann & Stackebrandt 1995, 838. In Goodfellow M, Kampfer P, Busse H-J, Trujillo ME, Suzuki K. et al (editors) Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd ed. vol. 5 New York: Springer Verlag; 2012 pp 578–624 [CrossRef]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Claus D. A standardized Gram staining procedure. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 1992; 8:451–452 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Bernardet JF, Nakagawa Y, Holmes B. Subcommittee on the taxonomy of Flavobacterium and Cytophaga-like bacteria of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes Proposed minimal standards for describing new taxa of the family Flavobacteriaceae and emended description of the family. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:1049–1070 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Xu P, Li WJ, Tang SK, Zhang YQ, Chen GZ et al. Naxibacter alkalitolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the family ‘Oxalobacteraceae’ isolated from China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1149–1153 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kovacs N. Identification of Pseudomonas pyocyanea by the oxidase reaction. Nature 1956; 178:703–704 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Gonzalez C, Gutierrez C, Ramirez C. Halobacterium vallismortis sp. nov. an amylolytic and carbohydrate-metabolizing, extremely halophilic bacterium. Can J Microbiol 1978; 24:710–715 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Tang SK, Wang Y, Chen Y, Lou K, Cao LL et al. Zhihengliuella alba sp. nov., and emended description of the genus Zhihengliuella. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:2025–2031 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Hasegawa T, Takizawa M, Tanida S. A rapid analysis for chemical grouping of aerobic actinomycetes. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1983; 29:319–322 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Minnikin DE, O'Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Meth 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in Actinomycetes and Corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Kroppenstedt RM. Separation of bacterial menaquinones by HPLC using reverse phase (RP18) and a silver loaded ion exchanger as stationary phases. J Liq Chromatogr 1982; 5:2359–2367 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids MIDI Technical Note 101 Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Hu QW, Chu X, Xiao M, Li CT, Yan ZF et al. Arthrobacter deserti sp. nov., isolated from a desert soil sample. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:2035–2040 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Chen YG, Tang SK, Zhang YQ, Li ZY, Yi LB et al. Arthrobacter halodurans sp. nov., a new halotolerant bacterium isolated from sea water. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2009; 96:63–70 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Kageyama A, Morisaki K, Ōmura S, Takahashi Y. Arthrobacter oryzae sp. nov. and Arthrobacter humicola sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:53–56 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001623
Loading
Arthrobacter ginkgonis sp. nov., an actinomycete isolated from rhizosphere of Ginkgo biloba L.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67, 319 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001623
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001623
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001623
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error