1887

Abstract

Whole-genome sequencing and PFGE analysis of DCY85 and DCY85-1 showed these strains are highly similar and may even be clones of the same strain. The PFGE patterns of I-, II-, and I-digested genomic DNA of the two strains were indistinguishable. Based on the priority of valid publications of the species basonyms, and , it is proposed to reclassify as a later synonym of The description was emended by replacing the DNA G+C content value of 66.0 mol%, which is higher than the 65 mol% considered the threshold for species of the genus , with the value of 62.4–62.5 mol%, calculated as the mean DNA G+C content of the draft genomes of strains DCY85-1 and DCY85.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001314
2016-10-01
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/66/10/4085.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001314&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Auch A. F., von Jan M., Klenk H. P., Göker M. 2010; Digital DNA–DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2:117–134 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aziz R. K., Bartels D., Best A. A., DeJongh M., Disz T., Edwards R. A., Formsma K., Gerdes S., Glass E. M. et al. 2008; The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bankevich A., Nurk S., Antipov D., Gurevich A. A., Dvorkin M., Kulikov A. S., Lesin V. M., Nikolenko S. I., Pham S. et al. 2012; SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dobritsa A. P., Reddy M. C., Samadpour M. 2010; Reclassification of Herbaspirillum putei as a later heterotypic synonym of Herbaspirillum huttiense, with the description of H. huttiense subsp. huttiense subsp. nov. and H. huttiense subsp. putei subsp. nov., comb. nov., and description of Herbaspirillum aquaticum sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60:1418–1426 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dobritsa A. P., Samadpour M. 2016; Transfer of eleven species of the genus Burkholderia to the genus Paraburkholderia and proposal of Caballeronia gen. nov. to accommodate twelve species of the genera Burkholderia and Paraburkholderia . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:2836–2846 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Estrada-de los Santos P., Vinuesa P., Martínez-Aguilar L., Hirsch A. M., Caballero-Mellado J. 2013; Phylogenetic analysis of Burkholderia species by multilocus sequence analysis. Curr Microbiol 67:51–60 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Farh M. E.-A., Kim Y. J., Van An H., Sukweenadhi J., Singh P., Huq M. A., Yang D. C. 2015a; Burkholderia ginsengiterrae sp. nov. and Burkholderia panaciterrae sp. nov., antagonistic bacteria against root rot pathogen Cylindrocarpon destructans, isolated from ginseng soil. Arch Microbiol 197:439–447 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Farh M. E.-A., Kim Y. J., Van An H., Sukweenadhi J., Singh P., Huq M. A., Yang D. C. 2015b; Burkholderia ginsengiterrae sp. nov. and Burkholderia panaciterrae sp. nov. In List of New Names and New Combinations Previously Effectively, but not Validly, Published, Validation List no. 166. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:3763–3767 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Goris J., Konstantinidis K. T., Klappenbach J. A., Coenye T., Vandamme P., Tiedje J. M. 2007; DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:81–91 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gyaneshwar P., Hirsch A. M., Moulin L., Chen W. M., Elliott G. N., Bontemps C., Estrada-de Los Santos P., Gross E., Dos Reis F. B. et al. 2011; Legume-nodulating betaproteobacteria: diversity, host range, and future prospects. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 24:1276–1288 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kim M., Oh H. S., Park S. C., Chun J. 2014; Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:346–351 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lapage S. P., Sneath P. H. A., Lessel E. F., Skerman V. B. D., Seeliger H. P. R., Clark W. A. (editors) 1992 International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1990 Revision). Bacteriological Code Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology;
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Overbeek R., Olson R., Pusch G. D., Olsen G. J., Davis J. J., Disz T., Edwards R. A., Gerdes S., Parrello B. et al. 2014; The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42:D206–D214 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Sawana A., Adeolu M., Gupta R. S. 2014; Molecular signatures and phylogenomic analysis of the genus Burkholderia: proposal for division of this genus into the emended genus Burkholderia containing pathogenic organisms and a new genus Paraburkholderia gen. nov. harboring environmental species. Front Genet 5:429 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Tenover F. C., Arbeit R. D., Goering R. V., Mickelsen P. A., Murray B. E., Persing D. H., Swaminathan B. 1995; Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 33:2233–2239[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Wayne L. G., Brenner D. J., Colwell R. R., Grimont P. A. D., Kandler O., Krichevsky M. I., Moore L. H., Moore W. E. C., Murray R. G. E. et al. 1987; Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001314
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001314
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error