Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T10:16:41.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Control: The Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, 1933–1951

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

Neveen Abdelrehim ,
Josephine Maltby  and
Steven Toms
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new conceptualization of corporate social responsibility (CSR) is presented as a means of asserting and maintaining corporate control in the face of political, economic, and social challenges. The Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC) applied different strategies to maintain control of its Iranian assets in the face nationalist demands—political and covert mechanisms, market based, resource access controls, and CSR programs. This paper investigates the third, and least explored, strand of their strategy. It identifies managerial strategies for CSR engagement with respect to three corresponding interest groups: politicians and diplomats, shareholders, and local employees, drawing on a variety of previously unused archival sources. From prior studies it is unclear whether the AIOC's CSR programs, for example, in employment and housing, were motivated by social improvement, its business agenda, or responses to legislative pressures from the Iranian government. A detailed examination of CSR policy and private correspondence between AIOC's senior executives about their negotiations with the Iranian government shows that they engaged in and reported voluntary CSR activities to strengthen their reputation and negotiating position but refused to compromise on aspects of CSR that threatened the existing managerial hierarchy of control. This interpretation is supported by a content analysis of the company's annual reports in the years before and after nationalization, revealing a choice of topics and language intended to support its self-presentation as a socially concerned employer. The results of this study have wider implications for understanding CSR reporting as a corporate strategy to enhance negotiating and bargaining positions.

Type
Articles
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 824 - 862
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2011. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Books

Abrahamian, E. Iran Between Two Revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Bamberg, J. The History of the British Petroleum Company. Vol. 2, The Anglo Iranian Years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Bill, J., and Louis, Wm. Musaddiq, Iranian Nationalism, and Oil. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Bostock, F., and Jones, G., “British Business in Iran, 1860s–1970s.” In British Business in Asia since 1860, edited by Davenport-Hines, R. and Jones, G.31–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Brumberg, D., and Ahram, A., The National Iranian Oil Company in Iranian Politics. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Caroe, O. The Wells of Power. London: Macmillan, 1951.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Elm, M. Oil, Power, and Principle: Iran’s Oil Nationalisation and Its Aftermath. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Elwell-Sutton, L. Persian Oil, A Study in Power Politics. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1955.Google Scholar
Engler, R. The Politics of Oil: A Study of Private Power and Democratic Directions. New York: Macmillan, 1961.Google Scholar
Ferrier, R. “The Anglo Iranian oil dispute: a triangular relationship.” In Musaddiq, Iranian Nationalism and Oil, edited by Bill, J.A. and Louis, W.R., 164–199. London: Tauris, 1988.Google Scholar
Ferrier, R. The History of the British Petroleum Company: Vol. 1, The Developing Years 1901–1932. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Gasiorowski, M. US Foreign Policy and the Shah: Building a Client State in Iran. lthaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Gasiorowski, M., and Bryne, M.,MohammadMosaddeq and the 1953 Coup in Iran: Modern Intellectual and Political History of the Middle East. New York: Syracuse University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Hart, R. Diction 5.0: The Text-analysis Program. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2000.Google Scholar
Issawi, C. An Economic History of the Middle East and North Africa. New York: Columbia University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Issawi, C., and Yeganeh, M., The Economics of Middle Eastern Oil. New York: Preager, 1962.Google Scholar
Johnson, V. “British Multinationals, Culture and Empire in the Early Twentieth Century.” PhD thesis, King’s College, London, 2007.Google Scholar
Jones, G. The State and the Emergence of the British Oil Industry. London: Macmillan Press Ltd, University of London, 1981.Google Scholar
Karshenas, M. Oil, State and Industrialization in Iran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Kinzer, S. All the Shah’s Men: An American coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror. New York: Wiley, 2008.Google Scholar
Longhurst, H. Adventure in Oil: The Story of British Petroleum. London. Sidgwick and Jackson, 1959.Google Scholar
Louis, Wm. The British Empire in the Middle East, 1945–1951: Arab Nationalism, the United States, and Post war Imperialism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Neimark, M. The Hidden Dimensions of Annual Reports: Sixty Years of Social Conflict at General Motors. New York: Markus Wiener Publishing, 1992.Google Scholar
O’Brien, T. The Revolutionary Mission: American Enterprises in Latin America 1900–1949. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Parra, F. Oil Politics, a Modern History of Petroleum. London: I.B. Tauris, 2004.Google Scholar
Penrose, E. The Large International Firm in Developing Countries: The International Petroleum Industry. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1968.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, K. Countercoup: The Struggle for the Control of Iran. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979.Google Scholar
Sampson, A. The Seven Sisters: The Great Oil Companies and the World They Made. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1975.Google Scholar
Stern, A. Who Won the Oil Wars? London: Collins and Brown, 2005.Google Scholar
Tignor, R. Capitalism and Nationalism at the End of Empire: State and Business in Decolonizing Egypt, Nigeria, and Kenya, 1945–1963. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Tinker-Salas, M. The Enduring Legacy: Oil, Culture, and Society in Venezuela. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Vernon, R. “State-owned enterprises in Latin American exports.” In Export diversification and the new protectionism, edited by Baer, W. and Gillis, M., University of Illinois Press at Urbana-Champaign, 1981: 98–114.Google Scholar
Yergin, D. The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money, & Power. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1991.Google Scholar

Articles and Essays

Abrahamian, E. “The 1953 Coup in Iran.” Journal of Science and Society 65, no. 2 (2001): 182–215.Google Scholar
Andersen, S. “Building for the Shah: Market Entry, Political Reality and Risks on the Iranian Market, 1933–1939.” Enterprise and Society 9, no. 4 (2008): 637–69.Google Scholar
Bucheli, M. “Major Trends in the Historiography of the Latin American Oil Industry.” Business History review 84 (2010): 339–62.Google Scholar
Bucheli, M. “Multinational Corporations, Totalitarian Regimes and Economic Nationalism.” Business History 50, no .4 (2008): 433–54.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. “The Rational Reconstruction of Society: 1992 Presidential Address.” American Sociological Association 58, no. 1 (1993): 1–15.Google Scholar
Decker, S. “Building Up Goodwill: British Business, Development and Economic Nationalism in Ghana and Nigeria, 1945–1977.” Enterprise & Society 9, no. 4 (2008): 602–13.Google Scholar
Decker, S. “Corporate Legitimacy and Advertising: British Companies and the Rhetoric of Development in West Africa, 1950–1970.” Business History Review 81, no. 1 (2007): 59–86.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T., and Preston, L., “The Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications.” Academy of Management Review 20 (1995): 65–91.Google Scholar
Dowling, J., and Pfeffer, J.. “Organisational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organisational Behaviour.” Pacific Sociological Review 18, no. 1 (1975): 122–36.Google Scholar
Esfahani, H., and Pesaran, M., “Iranian Economy in the Twentieth Century: A Global Perspective.” In Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0815. Faculty of Economics: University of Cambridge, 2008: 1–34.Google Scholar
Farge, N., and Wells, L.. “Bargaining Power of the Multinationals and Host Governments.” Journal of International Business Studies 13 (1982): 9–23.Google Scholar
Forbes, N. “Multinational Enterprise, ‘Corporate Responsibility’ and the Nazi Dictatorship: the Case of Unilever and Germany in the 1930s.’ Contemporary European History 16, no. 2 (2007): 149–67.Google Scholar
Ghods, M. “The Rise and Fall of General Razmara.” Middle Eastern Studies 29, no.1 (1993): 22–35.Google Scholar
Greenwood, M. “Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility.” Journal of Business Ethics 74, no. 4 (2007): 315–27.Google Scholar
Jones, G. “Multinational Strategies and Developing Countries in Historical Perspective.” Working paper 10-076, Harvard Business School. (2010): 1–58.Google Scholar
Keddie, N. “The Iranian Power Structure and Social Change 1800-1868: An Overview.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 2, no. 1 (1971): 3–20.Google Scholar
Kobrin, S. “Diffusion as an Explanation of Oil Nationalisation.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 29, no. no. 1 (1985): 3–32.Google Scholar
Laird, P. “Putting Social Capital to Work.” Business History 50, no. 6 (2008): 685–94.Google Scholar
Louis, W., and Robinson, R.. “The Imperialism of Decolonization.” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 22, no. 3 (1994): 462–511.Google Scholar
Maltby, J. “‘Showing a Strong Front’: Corporate Reporting and the Business Case in Britain 1914–1919.” Accounting Historians Journal 32, no. 2 (2005): 145–72.Google Scholar
Maltby, J., and Tsamenyi, M., “Narrative Accounting Disclosure: Its Role in the Gold Mining Industry on the Gold Coast 1900–1949.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 21 (2010): 390–401.Google Scholar
Mansoor, M. “State-Centered vs. Class-Centered Perspectives on International Politics: The case of U.S. and British Participation in the 1953 coup against premier Mosaddeq in Iran.” Studies in Comparative International Development 24, no. 2 (1989): 3–23.Google Scholar
Marsh, S. “Anglo-American Crude Diplomacy: Multinational Oil and the Iranian Oil Crisis, 1951–1953.” Contemporary British History Journal 21, no. 1 (2007): 25–53.Google Scholar
Marsh, S. “The United States, Iran and Operation Ajax: Inverting Interpretative Orthodoxy.” Middle Eastern Studies 39, no. 3 (2003): 1–38.Google Scholar
Marsh, S. “HMG, AIOC and the Anglo- Iranian Oil Crisis.” Diplomacy & Statecraft 12, no. 4 (2001): 143–74.Google Scholar
Maurer, N. “The Empire Struck Back: the Mexican Oil Expropriation of 1938 Reconsidered.” Working paper 10–108, Harvard Business School (2010): 1–33.Google Scholar
Millward, R. “Business and the State.” In The Oxford Handbook of Business History, edited by Jones, G. and Zeitlin, J.. Oxford University Press, 2007: 529–557.Google Scholar
Odell, P. “The Significance of Oil.” Journal of Contemporary History 3, no. 3 (1968): 93–110.Google Scholar
Onslow, S. “Battlelines for Suez: The Abadan Crisis of 1951 and the Formation of the Suez Group.” Contemporary British History Journal 17, no. 2 (2003): 1–28.Google Scholar
Porter, M., and Kramer, M., “Strategy and Society, the Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility.” Harvard Business Review 84, no. 12 (2006): 78–92.Google Scholar
Portes, A. “Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 24 (1998): 1–24.Google Scholar
Rood, L. “Nationalisation and Indigenisation in Africa.” The Journal of Modern African Studies 14, no. 3 (1976): 427–47.Google Scholar
Toms, S., and Hasseldine, J.. “Asymmetric Response: Explaining Corporate Social Disclosure by Multi-National Firms in Environmentally Sensitive Industries.” Journal of Risk and Governance 1, no. 2 (2009): 157–74.Google Scholar
Verhoef, G. “Nationalism, Social Capital and Economic Empowerment: SANLAM and the Economic Upliftment of the Afrikaner People, 1918–1960.” Business History 50, no. 6 (2008): 695–713.Google Scholar
White, N. “The Business and the Politics of Decolonization: the British Experience in the Twentieth century.” The Economic History Review, New series 53, no. 3 (2000): 544–64.Google Scholar

Reports

AIOC Annual Report and Accounts, 1948–1950.Google Scholar
ILO Report. Labour Conditions in the Oil Industry in Iran, 1950.Google Scholar
Hansard House of Commons Debates 01 May 1951. Vol. 487 cc1008-14.Google Scholar
Iranian Press extracts,.ITTILA’AT. The Times.Google Scholar
The Manchester Guardian.Google Scholar

Archival Sources

BP 126407 (Report on visit to Tehran 31st August to 26th October 1948).Google Scholar
BP 101099 (AIOC opinion on 20th June 1948). BP 52887 (Jacks to Fraser, 15th December 1933).Google Scholar
BP 126422 (Note of second meeting of the understanding committee on 3rd May 1949).Google Scholar
BP 126349 (Reference No. 522, Northcroft to Rice on 12th December 1950).Google Scholar
BP 126347 (letter 307, Tehran correspondence regarding position of Iranian government and Supplemental Agreement, 16th July 1950).Google Scholar
BP 126347 (Reference number 318, Northcroft to Rice, 29th July 1950).Google Scholar
BP 126347 (Reference number 425, Northcroft to Rice, 19th October 1950).Google Scholar
BP 070268 (Fraser to Jacks on 16 November 1933).Google Scholar
BP 68067 (Jameson to Fraser, 6 March 1938).Google Scholar
BP 067627 (Report on a visit to Tehran in 1938).Google Scholar
BP 67590 (Notes of meetings held at Abadan, 22nd February 1934).Google Scholar
BP 66815 (Jameson to father, 24th October 1917).Google Scholar
BP 49673 (Report by J. M. Wilson on certain aspects of the company’s building proposals in Persia, 3rd April 1934).Google Scholar
BP 101099, Mr. Addison’s Persian file, Memorandum, 1946- 1949; (Gidel Memorandum).Google Scholar
BP 126347 (Reference number 604, Rice to Northcroft, 6th October 1950).Google Scholar
BP 070266 (Gass to Elkington on 29th May 1935).Google Scholar
BP 070266 (Gass to Elkington on 14th May 1935).Google Scholar
BP 59011 (Elkington to Medlicott, 11th July 1929).Google Scholar
BP 37074 (fields medical and health services, 21st April 1927, 13).Google Scholar
BP 62398 (Medical services, 6th March 1924).Google Scholar
BP 101099 (opinion on general plan 20th February 1948).Google Scholar