A publishing partnership

A NEW ABUNDANCE SCALE FOR THE GLOBULAR CLUSTER 47 Tuc

and

Published 2008 March 12 © 2008. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation Andreas Koch and Andrew McWilliam 2008 AJ 135 1551 DOI 10.1088/0004-6256/135/4/1551

This article is corrected by 2008 AJ 136 518

1538-3881/135/4/1551

ABSTRACT

We present chemical abundances for O, Na, Mg, Al, Si, Ca, Ti, and Fe in eight red giants and one turnoff star in the metal-rich globular cluster 47 Tuc, based on spectroscopy with the Magellan Inamori Kyocera Echelle high-resolution spectrograph on the Magellan 6.5 m Clay telescope. A robust line by a line differential abundance analysis technique, relative to the K-giant Arcturus, was used to reduce systematic errors from atmospheric and atomic parameters. Our derived mean LTE [Fe/H] of −0.76 ± 0.01 ± 0.04 dex (random and systematic error, respectively) is more metal poor by about 0.1 dex than recent literature results. The chemical element ratios in this nearby globular cluster most closely resemble those of the Galactic bulge, although there is a non-negligible overlap with the composition of thick-disk stars. We find that the [Al/Fe] and [Na/Fe] ratios coincide with the upper boundary of the trends seen in the bulge and thick disk. There is only a small intrinsic scatter in the majority of the abundance ratios, indicating that 47 Tuc is mostly a rather chemically homogeneous system.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. INTRODUCTION

At a typical age range of 10–15 Gyr, globular clusters constitute the oldest stellar objects in the universe and are thus ideal tracers of the early evolution of the Galaxy (Krauss & Chaboyer 2003). For a profound understanding of their stellar populations, and their link to galactic evolution, it is essential to obtain accurate ages from photometric surveys. Currently, stellar ages are predominantly derived from isochrone fits to the red giant branch (RGB), the main-sequence turnoff (MSTO) or white dwarf cooling sequences. However, the MSTO fit approach generally suffers from uncertainties in the distance modulus and unresolved reddening issues, whereas accurate observations toward the white dwarf regime are only sparsely available (e.g., Hansen et al. 2007). Furthermore, the chief impediment for obtaining accurate ages for stellar populations from RGB fits is the a priori unknown enhancement in α-elements and the occurrence of age–metallicity degeneracies.

The Space Interferometry Mission (SIM) will obtain accurate (∼4 micro-arcsec) parallaxes to a number of Population II objects (globular clusters and field stars in the halo) resulting in a significant improvement in the Population II distance scale and greatly reducing the uncertainty in the estimated ages of the oldest stars in our galaxy (Shao 2004; Chaboyer et al. 2005). A critical component for improving the age determinations of globular clusters to ∼5% is to measure absolute metallicities of the clusters with an accuracy of ∼0.05 dex. The aforementioned problems are then resolvable if photometric and distance data are supplemented with accurate spectroscopic measurements of metallicities and chemical abundance ratios.

Here we present a chemical abundance study based on a set of high-resolution spectra of eight red giant stars and one subgiant in the close (d = 4.5 kpc; Harris 1996) Galactic globular cluster 47 Tuc (≡NGC 104). Previous work on 47 Tuc that employed various stellar tracers, such as red giants (Alves-Brito et al. 2005), subgiants and dwarfs (Carretta et al. 2004) and asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars (Wylie et al. 2006), all agree on a mean metallicity near −0.7 dex; however, no consensus about an accurate absolute [Fe/H] has been reached, yet. In particular the age of 47 Tuc has been the subject of debate: while Gratton et al. (2003) estimate an age of ∼11 Gyr, thus 2.6 Gyr younger than the old Galactic halo, McNamara (2001) and Liu & Chaboyer (2000) suggest an age in excess of 12.5 Gyr and thus comparable to the halo component. Several studies argue that 47 Tuc's color–magnitude diagram (CMD) bears a striking resemblance with the solar metallicity bulge clusters NGC 6553 and NGC 6528 (Ortolani et al. 1995; Zoccali et al. 2003). In this light, refining 47 Tuc's age and metallicity scale will also have a major impact on studies of the Galactic structure and the evolution of its components. Furthermore, the mean locus of 47 Tuc's RGB, i.e., the cluster's photometric fiducials, has often been employed as a template to estimate the metallicity of resolved stellar systems such as dwarf spheroidal galaxies (e.g., Koch et al. 2006). Therefore, the reliable interpolation of a grid of fiducials requires a well-defined metallicity scale (Sarajedini & Layden 1997).

Ideally, the effort of establishing a reliable age scale requires an absolute metallicity scale with a desired accuracy of better than 0.05 dex in [Fe/H]. To achieve this, we perform our abundance analysis relative to the bright Galactic K-giant Arcturus, in order to minimize undesired dependences of the abundances on model atmospheres and atomic parameters, in particular log gf values. In this, our work follows closely the recent bulge abundance studies of Fulbright et al. (2006, 2007; hereinafter F06 and F07).

Finally, by means of the trends of the abundance ratios, one can approach the question of whether 47 Tuc can be plausibly assigned to any of the Galactic components. In the traditional division of Zinn (1985), 47 Tuc is considered a typical disk cluster, which was later on specified by Armandroff (1989) in terms of an association with the thick disk. Dynamical evidence suggests, however, that this metal-rich cluster rather exhibits bulge-like properties (Minniti 1995; Côté 1999). Recent abundance results indicate that 47 Tuc is dissimilar to either the typical disk, bulge or halo globular cluster populations. In this context, Alves-Brito et al. (2005) argue in favor of 47 Tuc being a thick-disk member. Common tracers of star formation as the α-elements are found to be enhanced in this cluster, which would support the view of being an old system. Clearly, there is no consensus about the status and membership of 47 Tuc as yet.

This paper is organized as follows: in Section 2 we present the data set and the standard reductions taken, while our atomic line list and stellar atmospheres are briefly introduced in Section 3. The derivation of stellar parameters as well as a description of the abundance analysis relative to reference stars is presented in Section 4. Following the error analysis in Section 5, the metallicity scale and abundance results are discussed in Section 6. Finally, Section 7 summarizes our findings.

2. DATA & REDUCTION

Observations were carried out over four nights in 2003 July using the Magellan Inamori Kyocera Echelle (MIKE) spectrograph at the 6.5m Magellan2/Clay Telescope (see the observing log in Table 1). The targets for this project were selected from the photometry of Kaluzny et al. (1998) and infrared colors from the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) database (Skrutskie et al. 2006). Our target list included eight RGB stars with VK photometric temperatures within 200 K of the Arcturus temperature, plus one star near the cluster turnoff (TO) with a photometric temperature close to the solar value (Figure 1). A list of the targeted stars is given in Table 2, together with their photometric properties. For the present data, we employed the full spectral coverage of the red echelle set-up, which yielded a range of 4650–8300 Å. By using a slit width of 0.5'' and binning 2 × 1 CCD pixels, we obtained a spectral resolving power of R∼ 40,000 for the RGB stars. For the TO star we employed a slit width of 0.75'' and 2 × 2 binning, which gave a resolving power near R∼ 27,000. Typically, each RGB star was observed for 1 h, while for the TO star we obtained a total exposure exceeding 11 h, through variable sky conditions. The observations were split into several exposures to facilitate the removal of cosmic ray effects.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Location of our target stars in color–magnitude space. The J and K magnitudes were taken from the 2MASS survey (Skrutskie et al. 2006), whereas the V and I photometry is that of Kaluzny et al. (1998). The dwarf star (at V∼ 17.6) is below the magnitude limit of 2MASS. The observations in the lower panel are compared to a 12 Gyr alpha-enhanced, η = 0.4, theoretical Teramo isochrone with [Fe/H] = −0.70; the isochrone is shifted for E(BV) = 0.03, (mM) = 13.22 and a (VI) color shift of −0.033 mag to put the Teramo colors on the Alonso et al. (1999) Teff–(VI) system.

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 1.  Log of Observations

(−1.5 ex) ID Date Exposure time (s) S/N (pixel−1)
1 2003 Jul 06, 22  6060 100
2 2003 Jul 22, 24  3300 135
3 2003 Jul 24  2700 150
4 2003 Jul 01  3600 120
5 2003 Jul 06  3600 100
6 2003 Jul 22  3600 120
7 2003 Jul 22  4500 120
8 2003 Jul 24  3600 115
TO 2 2005 Nov 21 40,000  67
Hip 66815 2005 Apr 21   120 500

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Table 2.  Properties of the Target Stars

ID α δ V VI JK VK  vr σvr
  (J2000)         (km s−1)
1 00 22 07.1 −72 00 32.9 12.57 1.38 0.89 3.21 −13.0 0.48
2 00 22 05.7 −72 07 15.7 12.55 1.32 0.87 3.13 −11.7 0.49
3 00 23 05.2 −72 04 28.0 12.53 1.29 0.80 3.00 −17.9 0.50
4 00 22 32.0 −72 06 48.9 12.83 1.26 0.85 3.00 −19.2 0.69
5 00 22 59.9 −72 01 33.6 13.04 1.24 0.82 2.97 −18.6 0.65
6 00 22 59.7 −72 07 06.1 13.18 1.26 0.81 2.97 −7.5 0.51
7 00 23 06.3 −72 11 10.7 13.32 1.22 0.78 2.85 −8.2 0.45
8 00 22 58.1 −71 59 32.8 13.50 1.21 0.78 2.81 −26.5 0.41
TO 2 00 22 01.5 −72 10 02.8 17.63 0.68 ... ... −15.3 0.36
Hip 66815 13 41 42.7 −04 01 45.9 8.83 0.62 0.34 1.44 −64.5 0.24

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

The pipeline reduction package of Kelson et al. (2000) and Kelson (2003) was used to reduce and extract the spectra from the raw data. The extracted spectra were finally continuum normalized to first order by dividing through a blaze function. The latter was obtained by fitting a high-order polynomial to the high signal-to-noise (S/N) continuum spectrum of a star from the very metal-poor cluster M30, which had preferentially few, and very weak, absorption lines compared to the 47 Tuc stars. Typical S/Ns, as defined by the peak value in the order containing the Hα-line, range from 100–150 per pixel for the bright red giants and reach ∼65 for the fainter TO star.

Radial velocities of the target stars were determined from the Doppler shifts of the order of 10 strong, unsaturated, and unblended absorption features. Variations of the individual stellar velocities are, however, not critical for our analysis, since our equivalent width measurement program, GETJOB (McWilliam et al. 1995b), determines the line center of each feature independently during our later measurement process. Overall, we find a mean radial velocity of −15.4 km s−1 with a dispersion of 6.0 km s−1, where all of our nine targeted stars are confirmed radial velocity members (see Table 2).

3. LINE LISTS

For the purpose of our abundance analysis, we measured equivalent widths (EWs) of a large number of absorption features using the semi-automated spectrum measurement routine GETJOB (McWilliam et al. 1995b). To first order, the lines were measured by an automated fit of a Gaussian line profile, which then was manually improved by varying the spectral range to be included in the fit if necessary. The average measurement uncertainty on the derived EWs, as determined from the rms scatter of the observed feature around the fit, is thus 1.4 mÅ, or typically less than 4%. Lines measured on the overlapping regions of adjacent orders generally agreed well to within this uncertainty and their final EW was then taken as the error-weighted mean of the two values.

In order to properly define the spectral ranges in which to perform the continuum fitting, we used the same, fixed continuum regions as in F06. These authors selected and fitted regions of a well-defined continuum by spectral synthesis of the metal-rich red giant μ Leo, accounting for the strong influence of line blanketing. In doing so, we can yield a continuum setting accurate to a few tenths of a percent. The actual stellar continuum was then fitted through these points by a polynomial of third to fourth order, such as to minimize the reduced χ2 of the fit.

Our aim is to perform a differential line-to-line abundance analysis of our red giant sample relative to the well-studied K1.5 giant Arcturus (α Boo). In doing so, our analysis becomes largely insensitive to the various shortcomings of model atmospheres, such as the use of plane-parallel, 2D, and non-LTE approximations, but it also does not depend on the oft-uncertain atomic parameters, in particular the oscillator strengths of the absorption lines. The analysis of the TO star, on the other hand, requires another reference star that is preferentially close in its stellar parameters to those expected for the 47 Tuc star, as estimated from its photometry and previously published metallicities. Hence, we chose to perform the differential analysis for our TO star relative to the metal-rich ([Fe/H] ∼ −0.64 dex) Galactic field star Hip 66815 (e.g., Fulbright 2000; Sobeck et al. 2006). Both Arcturus and Hip 66815 need then to be placed on the solar abundance scale, which we achieve by an analogous differential analysis, using the published solar EW measurements of Prochaska et al. (2000); F06, and F07. Detailed spectrum synthesis of Arcturus and the Sun were employed by F06 to compile a line list that is essentially unaffected by contaminations from blended features. Moreover, the majority of these lines are sufficiently weak so that they still lie on the linear part of curve of growth. As our work also relies on the analysis relative to Arcturus and since our target stars are similar in their properties to the bulge giant sample of F06, F07, we will use the line list from F06 for the iron lines, and that from F07 for measuring the α-elements in the following. In particular, we adopted the EW measurements of F06, F07 for Arcturus to derive its log ε values later on. To further investigate potential biases from unresolved blends, F06 also calculated synthetic spectra for the super metal-rich ([Fe/H] ∼ +0.3 dex) field giant μ Leo. From this, they constructed a "clean" line list that is essentially free of blends, even at these high metallicities. Although neither Arcturus (at [Fe/H] = −0.5 dex; F06) nor any of our 47 Tuc stars (at an expected [Fe/H] of approximately −0.7 dex according to previous estimates; e.g., Rutledge et al. 1997; Carretta et al. 2004, and references therein), are not expected to exhibit the comparable problem of blends as μ Leo, we also ran our abundance analysis from only the clean line list. However, as Figure 2 indicates, there is no significant difference seen when using the full line list as opposed to only the clean subsample: the mean abundance ratio does not change upon variation of the line list, and also the rms scatter of the mean decreases by less than 0.01 dex.

Figure 2.

Figure 2. Excitation (top panel) and equivalent width (bottom panel) plots for Arcturus relative to the Sun. The full line list employed in this work is indicated as open circles (Fe i) and open squares (Fe ii), while the clean subset from Fulbright et al. (2006) is shown as filled symbols. The few lines that deviate significantly from the mean abundance are likely blends in the solar spectrum.

Standard image High-resolution image

Many of the features in the red giant line list will not be present in the (lower S/N) spectra of the hotter, high-gravity dwarf star. Thus, for our study of the TO star we supplemented the aforementioned line list by suitable transitions from the thick-disk study of Prochaska et al. (2000). The final line lists used throughout this work are given in Tables 3 and 4, together with the respective EW values in each of our targets.

Table 3.  Line List Used for the Red Giant Sample

Ion λ (Å) E.P. (eV) Equivalent widths (mÅ)
      Arcturus Sun #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8
[O i] 6300.31 0.00 67.00 ... 71.18 62.95 67.53 58.47 47.97 53.92 49.63 44.72
[O i] 6363.79 0.02 30.00 ... 38.00 33.25 36.32 33.26 21.80 25.39 19.93 24.92
Na i 5688.20 2.10 150.00 119.10 140.43 135.06 142.73 143.30 143.11 131.94 130.17 126.51
Na i 6154.23 2.10 73.00 40.50 60.54 55.01 60.93 68.62 68.37 53.63 51.78 45.99
Na i 6160.75 2.10 95.00 58.20 84.29 83.27 86.86 89.03 93.17 78.27 73.58 71.45

Only a portion of this table is shown here to demonstrate its form and content. A machine-readable version of the full table is available.

Download table as:  DataTypeset image

Table 4.  Line List Used for the TO Star

Ion λ (Å) E.P. (eV) Equivalent widths (mÅ)
      Hip 66815 Sun TO 2
[O i] 7774.17 9.14 44.89 63.70 51.86
[O i] 7775.39 9.14 36.96 53.20 37.82
Na i 5688.20 2.10 69.14 119.10 70.61
Na i 6154.23 2.10 11.09 40.50 9.97
Na i 6160.75 2.10 19.80 58.20 28.21

Only a portion of this table is shown here to demonstrate its form and content. A machine-readable version of the full table is available.

Download table as:  DataTypeset image

We note that we did not attempt to account for the Ca auto-ionization features (e.g., at 6319 Å) in determining the Mg i abundance and the affected weak lines were culled from the abundance determinations, whereas the stronger Mg line at 6318.75 Å yields an abundance estimate well in agreement with other, unaffected indicators. Finally, we did not include hyperfine splitting for the Na or Al lines in our analysis because the corrections are negligible for these two elements.

Finally, stellar abundances for each line were obtained using the abfind driver of the 2002 version of MOOG (Sneden 1973). The model atmospheres required for the abundance determinations will be detailed in the following section.

4. STELLAR ATMOSPHERES AND PARAMETERS

The stellar atmospheres to be used in the analysis were generated from the Kurucz non-LTE models1 without convective overshoot. As both Arcturus and 47 Tuc show evidence of enhancement in the α-elements by approximately +0.4 dex (e.g., Peterson et al. 1993; Carretta et al. 2004; F07) we used the α-enhanced opacity distributions AODFNEW2 by F. Castelli, whereas the appropriate models for the Sun and Hip 66815 (with [α/Fe] <0.2 dex) were calculated with the solar-scaled distributions, ODFNEW.

4.1. Arcturus Revised

For the Arcturus Teff we adopted the value of 4290 K derived by F06 from the angular diameter of Perrin et al. (1998) and the bolometric flux reported by Griffin & Lynas-Gray (1999). We note that the uncertainties on the bolometric flux, cited by Griffin & Lynas-Gray led F06 to assign a total 1σ Teff uncertainty of only 10 K. We now believe that Griffin & Lynas-Gray's flux uncertainty was too optimistic, as it is based on essentially the same observational data as numerous other studies (Mozurkewich et al. 2003; Alonso et al. 1999; Bell & Gustafsson 1989; Augason et al. 1980), yet those studies gave a range of bolometric flux values inconsistent with Griffin & Lynas-Gray's stated flux uncertainty. Here we adopt a 1σ uncertainty in the bolometric flux of 2.6% from the standard deviation of the fluxes estimated from the five investigations listed above. This translates to a 1σ Teff uncertainty of 28 K for Arcturus from the flux; the angular diameter contributes a temperature uncertainty of 8 K, thus indicating a total temperature uncertainty of 29 K.

F06 estimated log g = 1.6 and a microturbulent velocity parameter of 1.67 km s−1 for Arcturus. The Fe abundances in Arcturus, found using this initial set of stellar parameters, are shown in Figure 2. For this purpose, we consider the results relative to the Sun, for which we derived each line's abundance using the EWs of F06, measured from the atlas of Kurucz et al. (1984) and the canonical solar parameters of Teff = 5777 K, log g = 4.44 and ξ = 0.93 km s−1. A comparison of the Arcturus EWs measured from the Hinkle et al. (2000) Arcturus atlas with EW measurements of an Arcturus spectrum obtained with the MIKE spectrograph indicated that the MIKE EWs are ∼2% larger; this corresponds to ∼0.008 dex in abundance, which is smaller than the computational uncertainties.

Figure 2 (top panel) shows that the run of abundance versus excitation potential (henceforth "excitation plot") has essentially no slope, thus confirming the accuracy of the adopted temperature scale. The investigation of the differences between abundance analyses using plane-parallel and spherical geometry model atmospheres by Heiter & Eriksson (2006) predicts increased calculated abundances for low-excitation lines of neutral iron-peak elements by up to ∼0.3 dex. If the predictions are correct then the Arcturus excitation plot, using solar gf values, should show a slope when the correct temperature is adopted for Arcturus. However, Figure 2, indicates that, empirically, the absolute effect for Arcturus is rather small (∼0.05 dex), and therefore, the differential effect between Arcturus and the 47 Tuc stars must be negligible. This supports the validity of the excitation plots to constrain the temperatures of the 47 Tuc red giants. The same arguments apply to the possible effects of granulation on the derived abundances of Fe i lines as a function of excitation potential (see Steffen & Holweger 2002): Figure 2 shows that the difference in this effect is not detected between the Sun and Arcturus and so should be negligible when taken differentially between the 47 Tuc giants and Arcturus.

Our initial data showed, however, a considerable trend of iron abundance in Arcturus with EWs. This prompted us to lower the microturbulence to 1.54 km s−1 in order to remove any such remaining slope (lower panel of Figure 2). One noteworthy feature in these plots is, however, the lack of ionization equilibrium: while the mean iron abundance, [Fe/H], from the neutral stage is −0.49 ± 0.01 dex and thus consistent with the value of −0.50 from Peterson et al. (1993) and F06, the ionized species yield an abundance [Fe ii/H] higher by 0.08 ± 0.03 dex.

Our measured deficiency of Fe i, relative to Fe ii, is similar to the 0.03 to 0.06 dex non-LTE effect predicted for the K0III star Pollux by Steenbock (1985): the non-LTE correction for Fe i lines of high-excitation potential were ∼0.02 dex, while low-excitation lines required corrections of ∼0.05 dex, and the Fe ii correction was approximately −0.01 dex. Thus, a non-LTE excitation temperature for Pollux would be lower than the LTE value (a trend of increasing correction with line EW was also predicted, but in an LTE abundance analysis this would be absorbed into the microturbulent velocity parameter). For iron in the Sun, Steenbock (1985) found non-LTE corrections of 0.01 and 0.03 dex for weak high and low-excitation Fe i lines, respectively. More recent non-LTE calculations by Korn et al. (2003) found that collisions of hydrogen atoms with iron in the solar atmosphere are enhanced over the Darwin (1968, 1969) formalism by a factor of 3 (SH = 3); since Steenbock (1985) employed the Darwin formulae (i.e., SH = 1) Steenbock's non-LTE corrections for the Sun and Pollux are probably overestimated. Pollux is 560 K hotter than Arcturus (McWilliam 1990) and more metal-rich by ∼0.4 dex, so the non-LTE corrections may differ. However, F07 showed that the Fe i/Fe ii and Ti i/Ti i abundance ratios for bulge and disk red giants are approximately constant in the [Fe/H] interval from −1.5 to +0.5 dex and for Teff from 4000 to 5000 K; this suggests that the non-LTE corrections for Pollux and Arcturus are probably very similar. If we assume similar non-LTE correction for Arcturus and Pollux for an equal mix of low and high-excitation lines, and if we include the solar non-LTE corrections from Steenbock (1985) and Korn et al. (2003), then our estimate for the non-LTE-corrected Arcturus [Fe/H] from the neutral lines is −0.49 dex. The non-LTE corrected Fe ii lines indicate [Fe/H] of −0.46; this iron ionization difference, at 0.03 dex, is comparable to the 1σ random error on the mean Fe ii abundance, derived from a mere five lines.

In order to explore the effect of gravity of iron ionization equilibrium we opted to re-derive the mass of Arcturus by comparing its location in the Teff-luminosity diagram with theoretical isochrones. The luminosity was obtained from its Hipparcos-catalog-based apparent magnitude and distance of (−0.04 ± 0.02) mag, (11.25 ± 0.09) pc, respectively. A bolometric correction (BC) of (−0.78 ± 0.02) was adopted from an interpolation of the predicted photometry from the Kurucz-atmosphere grid. For consistency it is also necessary to employ the predicted BCs with the Kurucz-based bolometric magnitude for the Sun, at 4.62, when computing stellar photometric gravities. The BCs implied by the Teramo group (BaSTI; Pietrinferni et al. 2004) could have been used with the standard Mbol of 4.74 for the Sun (e.g., Cox 2000) to give the same result. Unfortunately, F06; F07 did not appreciate this problem, so their computed gravity for Arcturus was too small by 0.04 dex.

We employed the solar composition and α-enhanced BaSTI isochrones (Pietrinferni et al. 2004; including the revised α-opacities from Ferguson et al. 2005) to estimate the mass and age of Arcturus, as indicated by its location in the Teff versus MV plane. Our analysis involved the use of cubic spline interpolation of the BaSTI grid to the metallicity, Z, and epsilon(O/Fe) of Arcturus, taken from the abundances of F07. In particular we interpolated to the Arcturus Z value (of 0.00954) for solar composition and α-enhanced BaSTI isochrones, followed by interpolation to the Arcturus epsilon(O/Fe) value of 1.67 dex. It is important to note that although the α-enhancements of Mg, Si and Ca employed in the BaSTI models are similar to the values seen in Arcturus, the O/Fe value of the models is 0.2 dex higher than observed; presumably this resulted from early high estimates of the solar oxygen abundance (e.g. Grevesse & Noels 1993) used in the BaSTI models.

Our results indicate a best-fitted age of 9.0+3.0−1.8 Gyr and a mass of 1.00+0.05−0.09 M for Arcturus. The uncertainties on age and mass include estimates for the uncertainties of Teff, distance, magnitude, metallicity and O/Fe ratio.

The BaSTI results are well consistent with the value derived from the α-enhanced Padova isochrones (Salasnich et al. 2000), from which we obtain (0.92 ± 0.09) M and (10.5 ± 1.0) Gyr. Lastly, we employed the Yonsei–Yale (Yi & Demarque 2003) set of isochrones, again accounting for enhanced α-element abundances of [α/Fe]=+0.4 dex. As Maraston (2005) argues, the BaSTI models tend to produce higher Teff for a given luminosity and mass compared to the other sets of isochrones. Hence the latter will necessarily result in lower age estimates. Concordant with this view, the Yonsei–Yale tracks provide a "best-fitted" mass of (1.22 ± 0.2) M and a corresponding younger age of (5 ± 1.5) Gyr. In the following, we will use the BaSTI based mass estimate, since these tracks incorporate a sophisticated, i.e., varying with metallicity, treatment of the mixing length and have succeeded best in matching the observations of Galactic globular clusters (Maraston 2005). Higher adopted mass, and accordingly log g, would aggravate the departure from ionization equilibrium, whereas coincidence of the neutral and ionized stage would require log g ∼ 1.44, which is established with a lower mass of 0.71 M.

If we appeal to errors in the basic parameters of α Boo to lower its mass, then an increase in Teff of ∼190 K, or an increase in the metallicity, Z, by 0.2 dex are required; these changes are far greater than the uncertainty in these two parameters, and so can be eliminated. Another possibility is that Arcturus has experienced mass loss, perhaps related to its metallicity and evolutionary phase, or as the result of interactions with a putative companion (e.g., Soderhjelm & Mignard 1998; Verhoelst et al. 2005; but see Griffin 1998). While this extra-ordinary mass loss is feasible, and may reflect lack of certainty of mass loss in metal-rich RGB stars, it seems a rather ad hoc assumption. Also, it remains unlikely that the observed temperature and luminosity are consistent with a lower mass of Arcturus.

We note in passing that the isochrone mass-loss parameter is not sufficient to reduce the derived Arcturus mass enough to obtain Fe ionization equilibrium. At the location of Arcturus on the RGB the mass-loss parameter values, η, of 0.2 and 0.4 (Reimers 1977) hardly affect the stellar mass; however, at the tip of the RGB and on the AGB these parameters do have a significant effect. Although it would enable ionization equilibrium the luminosity and temperature of Arcturus eliminate it as a possible AGB star. In the following, we adopt a mass of 1.00 M for Arcturus, based on the BaSTI isochrones, which corresponds to a gravity of 1.64 ± 0.03.

4.2. 47 Tuc—The Red Giant Sample

The Teff values of the target stars were calibrated using the empirical color–temperature relations from Alonso et al. (1999). For this purpose, we exploited the V and I photometry from Kaluzny et al. (1998), complemented by infrared J and K data from the 2MASS (Skrutskie et al. 2006). The 2MASS photometry was converted to the TCS system, employed in the Alonso et al. (1999) Teff calibration, using the Carpenter (2005, unpublished) 2MASS–CIT transformation3 and the CIT–TCS conversion of Alonso et al. (1998).

In addition to the color transformations it is necessary to correct for interstellar extinction; we employ the extinction law of Winkler (1997) throughout this work. Harris (1996) obtained a reddening for 47 Tuc of E(BV) = 0.05 mag, while the reddening maps of Schlegel et al. (1998) indicate E(BV) = 0.032 mag. Gratton et al. (2003) obtained E(BV) = 0.035 ± 0.009 from B−V colors and E(BV) = 0.021 ± 0.005 from b−y colors. The average of all four estimates is 0.035 ± 0.006; if the unusually low reddening from b−y colors by Gratton et al. (2003) is ignored, the average reddening becomes 0.039± 0.007 mag. Considering this distribution of reddening estimates for 47 Tuc for our initial reddening value we adopt E(BV) = 0.04 ± 0.01 mag.

The large baseline of the VK color and the steep color–temperature gradient for red giant stars makes this Teff estimate the least susceptible to potential photometric uncertainties. As a result temperatures derived from VK color are generally expected to be the most accurate and we shall use these values as the photometric Teff in the following. The typical uncertainty on VK temperatures, given by the photometry and calibration errors, is ∼40 K.

We chose to employ the Alonso et al. (1999) (VK) color temperatures differentially, relative to the known (VK) and Teff of Arcturus, in order to remove possible zero-point systematics in the calibration. The average of photometry from Lee (1970) and Johnson et al. (1966) were used to determine the Arcturus VK color of 2.925 mag (in the Johnson–Cousins system); we note that the VK color from the two studies differ from the mean by 0.025 mag. The Johnson VK color, when converted to the CIT system using the relations in Elias et al. (1985) and then to the TCS system, as described above, indicate Teff = 4252 K using the Alonso et al. (1999) calibration; this is 38 K cooler than the directly measured effective temperature of 4290 ± 29 K, based on absolute flux and angular diameter measurements. Thus, in order to place our 47 Tuc photometric VK temperatures onto the physical Teff scale for Arcturus it is necessary to add a zero point of 38 K to the values indicated by the Alonso et al. (1999) VK calibration. In this way our photometric Teff values are differential to the Arcturus value. We note that the ±0.025 mag range of the observed (VK) Arcturus color corresponds to 17 K.

In addition to the VK photometric temperatures we derived spectroscopic temperatures by demanding excitation equilibrium for Fe, i.e. that there is no slope in the plot of iron abundance versus excitation potential. Since each individual 47 Tuc line abundance is differential to the same line in Arcturus we ensured that our spectroscopically determined temperatures are on the same physical Teff scale as Arcturus. The differential VK photometric and spectroscopic temperatures in this work are listed in Table 5. The mean difference between the two temperatures, T(VK) − T(spec), is −5 K with an rms scatter of 41 K; this suggests a random error on the mean difference from the eight RGB stars of only ±15 K. We note that a reddening change of 0.01 mag. in E(BV) leads to a ∼19 K change in photometric Teff; thus, the agreement between our photometric and spectroscopic Teff values is consistent with the range of reddening values cited in the literature, from 0.03 to 0.04 mag.

Table 5.  Atmospheric Parameters

ID T(VK) (K) T(spec) (K) T(average) (K) log g (cm s−2) ξ (km s−1)
1 4191 4200 4196 1.31 1.54
2 4244 4270 4257 1.36 1.54
3 4320 4310 4315 1.26 1.70
4 4321 4260 4291 1.49 1.54
5 4342 4309 4326 1.60 1.54
6 4346 4380 4363 1.68 1.47
7 4431 4435 4433 1.79 1.45
8 4458 4530 4494 1.90 1.45
TO 2 ... 5750 ... 4.13 0.93
Hip 66815 5843 5780 5812 4.41 1.13

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

We adopted physical gravities for the 47 Tuc stars based on Equation (1):

Equation (1)

For the luminosities we used the dereddened V-band photometry of Kaluzny et al. (1998), BC from the Kurucz Web site and a distance modulus of (mM)0 = 13.22 ± 0.06. Our adopted distance modulus is the average from six studies (Zoccali et al. 2001; Percival et al. 2002; Gratton et al. 2003; Weldrake et al. 2004; McLaughlin et al. 2006; Thompson et al. 2008, in preparation) that used numerous techniques, including HST proper motions, the white dwarf cooling sequence, empirical CMD fitting, and eclipsing binaries.

Masses for the 47 Tuc stars were determined by comparison with the latest version of the Teramo α-enhanced isochrones (with α-element opacities from Ferguson et al. 2005). In Figure 1 we compare the observed 47 Tuc color–magnitude diagram with the α-enhanced, [Fe/H] = −0.70 dex, Teramo 12 Gyr isochrone; this is the average of the ages estimated by Zoccali et al. (2001) and Percival et al. (2002). This comparison suggests a typical mass of 0.89 M for our 47 Tuc RGB stars.

For a more precise comparison of the isochrones with the 47 Tuc giants we interpolated the isochrones to match the overall metallicity, Z, and the measured O/Fe ratio from a previous iteration on the abundances (Z = 0.0062, epsilon(O/Fe) = 1.77). The observed MV values of our 47 Tuc RGB stars were closest to the interpolated isochrones with ages in the range of 12–14 Gyr. However, these interpolated isochrones were all brighter than the observed MV values by a few hundredths of a magnitude, although the differences are well within the systematic uncertainties. For example: a Teff increase of 10 to 30 K, or a reddening increase of 0.01 mag (slightly more than the uncertainty on the observed Arcturus V magnitude) could account for the difference. This range of isochrone ages gave masses (for η = 0.4) of 0.87 M for the 12 Gyr isochrone to 0.81 M for 14 Gyr.

These isochrone-based masses compare favorably with the direct measurement of 0.871 ± 0.006 M for a subgiant in a double-lined, eclipsing, spectroscopic binary in 47 Tuc by Thompson et al. (2008, in preparation). Inspection of the 12 Gyr, α-enhanced, Teramo isochrones shows that the masses of the subgiant and our RGB stars should be equal to within 0.01 M. This is the case because the mass loss experienced by the RGB stars reduces their slightly higher original mass to the mass of the subgiant, according to the η = 0.4 prescription of the Teramo isochrones. Given the consistency of these methods we adopt the direct measurement of Thompson et al. (2008, in preparation), at 0.87 M for the mass of our 47 Tuc RGB stars. Since star #3 is closer to the AGB track in the CMDs shown in Figure 1 we adopt the AGB mass of 0.65 M for this star, as indicated by the interpolated Teramo isochrones, interpolated to the Z and O/Fe measured from the spectra. In the abundance iterations the overall metallicity parameter, [M/H], for the input model atmospheres, is equated to [Fe i/H] abundance from the previous iteration.

As an initial guess for the microturbulence parameter, ξ, for the model atmospheres, we used the same value as in Arcturus, due to the expected similarity in the spectral type of our target stars and α Boo. This value of 1.54 km s−1 provides a reasonable estimate for four of our eight stars in terms of no apparent trend of Fe i abundance with EW. The weakest lines with EWs below 12 smÅ were neglected for this part of the analysis. Nevertheless, stars #6–#8 required a ξ lower by ∼0.1 km s−1, while for star #3, this parameter had to be significantly increased (see Figure 3) to eliminate any such slope, as might be expected from its AGB star evolutionary status. Usually, ξ could be determined to within ±0.1 km s−1 accuracy.

Figure 3.

Figure 3. Excitation (left panels) and equivalent widths (right panels) plots for the stars #3 and #6 in 47 Tuc. The top panels show the Fe i (solid dots) and Fe ii (open squares) abundances derived using the photometric temperatures and a microturbulent velocity as in Arcturus, while the temperature and microturbulence in the lower panels were chosen such as to yield excitation equilibrium and to remove any trend of abundance with equivalent widths.

Standard image High-resolution image

Ionization equilibrium is not obtained for any of our eight red giants in 47 Tuc; the mean [Fe i/Fe ii] ratio is +0.083 ± 0.015 dex with a scatter of the eight stars of σ = 0.040 dex. The giant that comes closest to epsilon(Fe i)=epsilon(Fe ii) is star #7 with [Fe i/Fe ii] = +0.03 dex. This issue will be addressed in detail in Section 4.4.

The final chemical abundance ratios derived for the 47 Tuc red giant sample, using the spectroscopic excitation Teff values are listed in Table 6.

Table 6.  Abundance Results for the Red Giant Sample

Ion #1 #2 #3 #4
  [X/Fe] σ N [X/Fe] σ N [X/Fe] σ N [X/Fe] σ N
[Fe i/H] −0.77 0.06 112 −0.82 0.05 104 −0.78 0.06 109 −0.75 0.07 106
[Fe ii/H] −0.84 0.06 4 −0.95 0.07 5 −0.84 0.09 5 −0.89 0.08 5
[O i]a 0.66 ... 1 0.69 ... 1 0.57 ... 1 0.65 ... 1
Na i 0.17 0.03 3 0.21 0.05 3 0.22 0.02 3 0.31 0.02 3
Mg i 0.47 0.09 9 0.44 0.04 8 0.40 0.05 9 0.50 0.03 7
Al i 0.49 0.03 3 0.48 0.04 3 0.38 0.05 3 0.55 0.08 5
Si i 0.41 0.08 10 0.45 0.12 9 0.40 0.05 7 0.41 0.11 9
Ca i 0.35 0.03 9 0.39 0.09 10 0.29 0.03 9 0.41 0.06 9
Ti i 0.37 0.05 22 0.46 0.05 18 0.31 0.06 16 0.41 0.07 24
Ti ii 0.32 0.12 6 0.49 0.04 4 0.28 0.06 2 0.37 0.10 5
 
  #5 #6 #7 #8
Ion [X/Fe] σ N [X/Fe] σ N [X/Fe] σ N [X/Fe] σ N
 
[Fe i/H] −0.74 0.08 76 −0.74 0.05 102 −0.74 0.06 109 −0.72 0.05 105
[Fe ii/H] −0.82 0.06 4 −0.80 0.05 5 −0.76 0.06 5 −0.82 0.04 5
[O i]a 0.48 ... 1 0.60 ... 2 0.55 ... 1 0.61 ... 1
Na i 0.34 0.04 3 0.17 0.02 3 0.18 0.02 3 0.14 0.03 3
Mg i 0.48 0.06 7 0.45 0.07 9 0.47 0.07 9 0.45 0.07 9
Al i 0.52 0.03 3 0.45 0.06 4 0.44 0.02 3 0.45 0.04 3
Si i 0.35 0.09 10 0.39 0.08 10 0.37 0.08 11 0.38 0.08 8
Ca i 0.35 0.06 10 0.29 0.09 9 0.36 0.03 9 0.33 0.04 10
Ti i 0.31 0.07 23 0.33 0.06 17 0.34 0.05 20 0.31 0.05 16
Ti ii 0.36 0.11 6 0.40 0.12 5 0.37 0.05 4 0.46 0.06 6

Note. aThe [O/Fe] ratio was taken relative to Fe ii abundances due to similar sensitivity to gravity.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

4.3. 47 Tuc—the TO Star

The atmospheric parameters of the unevolved 47 Tuc TO star differ substantially from those of the red giant sample, so Arcturus can no longer be employed as a reference for differential abundance analysis. The 47 Tuc TO star was selected with Teff similar to the Sun, in order to perform a solar differential abundance analysis. However, due to its low-metallicity lines in the TO star are considerably weaker than the same lines in the Sun. As a result of the low S/N of the TO star spectrum lines that are measurable in the TO star are saturated in the Sun, thus reducing the effectiveness of a differential abundance analysis.

To solve this difficulty we employed a two-step differential abundance analysis using a bright Galactic halo field TO star, Hip 66815. Its parameters (5850 K, log g = 4.5, ξ = 0.95 km s−1, [Fe/H] = −0.64; Fulbright 2000; Sobeck et al. 2006) are comparable to those expected for the 47 Tuc TO star, judging from its location in color–magnitude space and the previously discussed red giant sample. Our S/N ∼ 500 spectrum of Hip 66815 enabled us to measure very weak lines, down to ∼5 mÅ, in this star that are not saturated in the solar spectrum. Thus, we used unsaturated lines in the 47 Tuc TO star and Hip 66815 for the first step, and then compared very weak, but well-measured, lines in Hip 66815 to unsaturated lines in the solar spectrum for the second step of the differential analysis. These lines and their EWs are listed in Table 4.

We refined the stellar parameters of Hip 66815 and the 47 Tuc TO star in the same manner as discussed above for the red giant sample. Thus it turned out that the temperature of Hip 66815 needed to be lowered by 100 K from the photometric value. Contrary to the red giants, damping issues such as Stark and van der Waals broadening play a progressively dominant role in the dense atmospheres of the dwarf stars. For the case of hydrogen we matched the observed Hα-line profile with a spectral synthesis, in which the damping constants in the classical Unsöld approximation were multiplied by a constant factor of 6.5, which provided the best fit to the line wings. In this case we obtained an independent, reddening-free estimate of the stellar Teff by synthesizing the temperature-sensitive wings of the Hα line. From this we found a Teff value in agreement with the photometric temperature to within 40 K. In the following we employed this damping factor enhancement of 6.5 over the Unsöld approximation for all the absorption lines. It should be noted that errors due to this approximate treatment will be absorbed by a change in the best-fitted microturbulence parameter.

In this way we found a [Fe/H] of −0.76 for the reference star Hip 66815, which is about 0.1 dex more metal poor than derived in earlier studies (Fulbright 2000; Sobeck et al. 2006); it should be noted that the Sobeck et al. (2006) work assumed the Fulbright Teff value. Fulbright's excitation Teff was based on laboratory log gf values, which may constitute a significant source of uncertainty, whereas our differential analysis is largely insensitive to the systematic effects induced by such atomic parameters. The photometric and excitation temperature of the 47 Tuc TO star agree remarkably well to within ≲20 K.

Ionization equilibrium is well established in Hip 66815, it does, however, not hold in the 47 Tuc TO star. We address this issue in detail in the next section. Our final abundance ratios for the 47 Tuc TO star are presented in Table 7.

Table 7.  Abundance Results for the TO Star

Ion TO 2
  [X/Fe] σ N
[Fe i/H] −0.75 0.13 53
[Fe ii/H] −0.63 0.18 5
[O i] 0.47 0.08 2
Na i 0.19 0.12 2
Mg i 0.34 0.11 2
Al i 0.33 0.01 2
Si i 0.46 ... 1
Ca i 0.33 0.08 5
Ti i 0.39 ... 1
Ti ii 0.43 0.08 2

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

4.4. Problems with Ionization Equilibrium in 47 Tuc

As can be seen from Table 6 the mean difference between Fe i and Fe ii abundances (ΔFe = epsilon(Fe i) − epsilon(Fe ii)) for our 47 Tuc giants (relative to Arcturus) is 0.08 dex. In this section we investigate possible resolutions of this apparent inconsistency. We note that the differential [Fe i/H] and [Fe i/H] values were computed based on an assumed [Fe/H] for Arcturus of −0.51 dex, from the Fe i lines alone. It is interesting that if we employ our Arcturus [Fe ii/H] value to compute the differential [Fe ii/H] for the 47 Tuc giants, and Fe i lines to compute [Fe i/H], the ionization equilibrium problem is reduced to only ΔFe = 0.03 dex; i.e. consistent to within 1σ of satisfying ionization equilibrium for Fe. Thus, it appears that the differential abundances of 47 Tuc relative to the Sun provides ionization equilibrium, while iron ionization equilibrium for Arcturus is not satisfied.

We remind the reader that the purpose of employing results differential to Arcturus was to avoid systematic errors in the model atmospheres, due to errors and the use of incomplete physical description in the 1D Kurucz model grid. Hence, it is also the difference between the Arcturus and 47 Tuc atmospheric parameters that determine whether ionization and excitation equilibrium are achieved. To explain the ionization imbalance it is then necessary to find an unaccounted systematic difference between the Arcturus and 47 Tuc red giant atmospheres.

In the mean, ionization equilibrium could be achieved by an average increase in log g for the 47 Tuc giants of ∼0.16 dex. As indicated by Equation (1), mass, luminosity, and temperature determine the gravity. If a systematic error in log g is the source of the apparent under-ionization of Fe, the change in log g cannot be due to mass, as this would indicate the presence of main sequence stars with M∼1.4 M (late F-type), which are not seen in 47 Tuc. For luminosity to create this change in log g would require a 0.5 mag decrease in the distance modulus, implying a distance to 47 Tuc closer by 500 pc, or (mM)0 = 12.72. This value lies 8σ below the mean value, and 0.3 mag lower than the lowest recent measurement of the distance modulus. Uncertainties in the photometry are less than a few hundredths of a magnitude, given the consistency of the Kaluzny et al. (1998) CMD with other published work (e.g., Armandroff 1988). We estimate the uncertainty on the Kurucz BCs at 0.05 mag, based on the uncertainties in temperature, gravity, and metallicity. Finally, the published reddening values for 47 Tuc cite uncertainties of 0.01 mag. The quadrature sum of these uncertainties affecting the luminosity amount to 0.04 dex in log g, much less than the 0.16 dex in log g required to explain the apparent under-ionization of iron.

At first glance it may seem that the required changes in log g cannot be due to temperature either, given the excellent agreement of the two sets of independent differential temperatures for our red giants on the Arcturus scale; it would be necessary to investigate how both temperature measures could be in error. However, the Fe ionization imbalance could be resolved with a modest systematic Teff decrease of ∼60 K, as can also be seen from Table 8. This would, however, lower the Fe i abundances by only ∼0.01 dex, and fortunately does not affect our conclusion on the [Fe/H] scale of our 47 Tuc red giants. The main effect is the enhanced temperature sensitivity of the Fe ii abundance, most likely due to a rapid change in the degree of Fe ionization at the Teff of Arcturus. Because of the differential nature of both the photometric and spectroscopic temperatures, relative to Arcturus, a shift in the adopted Arcturus Teff does not affect the relative derived temperatures of the 47 Tuc giants; thus, the ionization equilibrium is not directly affected by any reasonable change in the Arcturus temperature.

Table 8.  Error Analysis for the Giants #1 and #8 and the TO Star.

Ion ΔTeff Δ log  g Δξ Δ[M/H] ODF
  +50 K −50 K +0.2 dex −0.2 dex +0.1 km s−1 −0.1 km s−1 +0.1 dex −0.1 dex  
#1
Fe i +0.01 <0.01 +0.03 −0.06 −0.03 +0.03 +0.01 −0.02 −0.07
Fe ii −0.07 +0.09 +0.10 −0.16 −0.02 +0.03 +0.04 −0.06 −0.17
[O i] <0.01 −0.01 +0.09 −0.10 −0.01 +0.01 +0.04 −0.04 −0.12
Na i +0.05 −0.04 −0.01 <0.01 −0.03 +0.04 <0.01 <0.01 −0.02
Mg i <0.01 <0.01 +0.01 −0.03 −0.01 +0.01 +0.01 −0.01 −0.04
Al i +0.03 −0.03 −0.01 −0.01 −0.02 +0.02 −0.01 −0.01 −0.02
Si i −0.04 +0.05 +0.04 −0.08 −0.01 +0.01 +0.02 −0.03 −0.09
Ca i +0.06 −0.05 −0.01 −0.01 −0.05 +0.05 <0.01 <0.01 −0.04
Ti i +0.07 −0.09 <0.01 −0.01 −0.04 +0.02 −0.01 −0.01 −0.05
Ti ii −0.02 +0.03 +0.08 −0.10 −0.03 +0.05 +0.03 −0.03 −0.12
#8
Fe i +0.02 −0.02 +0.02 −0.02 −0.03 +0.03 +0.01 −0.01 −0.06
Fe ii −0.04 +0.05 +0.09 −0.11 −0.01 +0.03 +0.04 −0.04 −0.16
[O i] −0.01 +0.01 +0.08 −0.10 −0.01 +0.01 +0.04 −0.05 −0.12
Na i +0.04 −0.04 −0.01 <0.01 −0.03 +0.03 −0.01 <0.01 −0.01
Mg i +0.02 −0.01 <0.01 <0.01 −0.01 +0.01 <0.01 <0.01 −0.02
Al i +0.03 −0.04 −0.01 <0.01 −0.01 +0.01 −0.01 <0.01 −0.01
Si i −0.02 +0.02 +0.03 −0.05 −0.01 +0.01 +0.02 −0.02 −0.06
Ca i +0.05 −0.05 −0.01 <0.01 −0.05 +0.05 −0.01 +0.01 −0.02
Ti i +0.07 −0.08 <0.01 <0.01 −0.03 +0.03 −0.01 +0.01 −0.01
Ti ii −0.01 +0.02 +0.07 −0.09 −0.04 +0.03 +0.04 −0.03 −0.12
TO2
Fe i +0.07 −0.03 +0.07 −0.05 <0.01 +0.01 <0.01 <0.01 −0.04
Fe ii −0.01 +0.04 −0.03 +0.06 +0.04 −0.01 +0.04 <0.01 <0.01
[O i] −0.02 +0.02 −0.01 +0.01 −0.01 <0.01 <0.01 −0.01 <0.01
Na i −0.01 +0.02 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 +0.01
Mg i −0.01 +0.01 <0.01 −0.01 −0.01 <0.01 <0.01 −0.01 −0.01
Al i −0.04 +0.03 −0.06 +0.03 −0.03 <0.01 <0.01 −0.02 −0.03
Si i −0.06 +0.04 −0.03 <0.01 −0.03 <0.01 −0.01 −0.01 <0.01
Ca i −0.01 <0.01 +0.06 −0.09 −0.04 +0.01 +0.01 −0.04 −0.09
Ti i −0.06 +0.04 −0.03 <0.01 −0.03 <0.01 −0.01 −0.01 <0.01
Ti ii −0.01 <0.01 +0.06 −0.09 −0.04 +0.01 +0.01 −0.04 −0.09

Note. Given are the deviations of the abundances from the values in Tables 6 and 7 upon varying the parameters by the given amount.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Next, we investigated the sensitivity of ionization equilibrium to the adopted model atmosphere [α/Fe] ratio. An increase from scaled-solar composition to the 0.4 dex enhancement of the Castelli/Kurucz α-enhanced model atmospheres raised the computed Fe ii/Fe i abundance ratio by ∼0.10 dex. This suggests that models with [α/Fe] enhancements of ∼0.8 dex for 47 Tuc would solve the Fe ionization problem—a value that has not been detected that highly in any globular cluster so far. Inspection of the abundances in Table 6 shows average α-element (O, Mg, Si, Ca, Ti) enhancement of 0.41 dex. In this regard it is interesting that the average α-enhancement for Arcturus is 0.34 dex; if Na and Al are included then the 47 tuc stars are enhanced by 0.39 dex and Arcturus is enhanced by 0.31 dex. To estimate the effect of the difference in composition of the light metals between Arcturus and 47 Tuc we computed the electron densities (e.g. see Mihalas 1978) for the Arcturus and 47 Tuc compositions at the Teff of star #8, with gas pressures indicated by the scaled solar and α-enhanced models. The change in electron density due to the composition difference was about one third of the change from scaled-solar to α-enhanced models, which suggests that the composition difference could account for ∼ 0.03 dex of the difference between Fe i and Fe ii abundances in the 47 Tuc stars. Thus, with the correction for composition difference between Arcturus and the 47 Tuc giants we only need to explain an ionization difference of 0.068 dex, which corresponds to a temperature decrease of ∼40 K.

If we adopt the Lee (1970) VK for Arcturus, at 2.90 mag, rather than the average of the Lee (1970) and Johnson et al. (1966) results, the 47 Tuc VK colors, differential to Arcturus, appear cooler, by 16 K. Next, if we employ a reddening for 47 Tuc of E(BV) = 0.027 mag, instead of the previously adopted 0.040, then our 47 Tuc photometric temperatures are reduced by an additional 24 K. This is not an unreasonable assumption: if the notably high reddening value of Harris (1996) is omitted, the unweighted average of the Schlegel et al. (1998) value and the two values from Gratton et al. (2003) gives E(BV) = 0.029 ±0.005. Unfortunately, we cannot find a satisfactory fit to the observed CMD with E(BV) = 0.02 and the standard theoretical isochrones of the Teramo group: in order to fit the RGB an older age is required with the lower reddening, but this then creates a poor fit for the core helium burning, red clump stars. On the other hand a reddening of E(BV) = 0.04 gave a good fit to the observed CMD (see Figure 1).

If the differential photometric VK temperatures are in fact cooler by 50–60 K we need to understand why the excitation of Fe i lines indicates a higher temperature. Because our excitation analysis is differential to the Arcturus line abundances, the excitation temperatures are themselves differential to the adopted Arcturus temperature; thus, if we lower the Arcturus Teff value the excitation temperatures will decline accordingly. One possibility is that there are systematic measurement differences between the Arcturus spectrum and the 47 Tuc spectra, since we did not obtain a spectrum of Arcturus with the same instrument as the 47 Tuc spectra; rather, we employed EWs measured from the high-S/N, high-resolving-power Hinkle et al. (2000) Arcturus atlas.

Another possibility is that the Kurucz models approximate the 47 Tuc stars differently from Arcturus, resulting from real physical differences between Arcturus and 47 Tuc stars. The difference between Fe ii and Fe i abundances could be understood if Arcturus is reddened by E(BV) ∼ 0.03 mag, or if Arcturus is an AGB star, and thus less massive than our CMD fit indicated. However, there is no evidence for this amount of reddening, and the V magnitude of Arcturus is too faint, by 0.15 mag, for it to be an AGB star. These possibilities would affect the derived excitation temperatures, but not the differential photometric temperatures.

It is also not possible to correct the inconsistency between Fe i and Fe ii abundances in 47 Tuc by altering the helium mass fraction, Y, of the cluster, because it would be necessary to drastically reduce Y—a reduction from Y = 0.20 to an unrealistically low value of Y = 0.10 changes the gravity by less than 0.1 dex (Green et al. 1987). Not only would such a low-Y value be inconsistent with big bang nucleosynthesis theory, but it is still insufficient to resolve the observed abundance differences in our 47 Tuc giants. On the other hand, an appealing alternative is that the helium fraction of Arcturus is significantly higher than normal expectations. Helium-rich Teramo isochrones, with Y = 0.40, were kindly supplied to us by S. Cassisi (2008, private communication). These isochrones fit the Arcturus temperature, luminosity, and composition with an age of 14 Gyr and a mass of 0.67 M. This old age offers a natural explanation for the enhanced [α/Fe] ratio in Arcturus, which would be difficult to understand if it is ∼3 Gyr younger than the globular clusters, as indicated from the isochrones with standard He composition (see Section 4.2), because supernovae (SNe) of Type Ia would be expected to have reduced the [α/Fe] ratio over that time. An increase in the He fraction of α Boo would, however, result in an opposite problem for the (differential) Fe i and Fe ii abundances for the bulge and disk giant stars in F06 and F07. Thus, it seems that the helium mass fraction cannot be altered to resolve the Fe ionization problem in our 47 Tuc red giants. Also, if Arcturus has log g near 1.44 dex, consistent with the Y = 0.40 tracks, then both its [Fe i/H] and [Fe ii/H] values decrease to −0.55 dex, while the mean of the [Fe/H] values for our 47 Tuc RGB stars remains unchanged, at −0.76 dex (see also Section 6).

It is possible that differential non-LTE effects, between Arcturus and the 47 Tuc giants, could result in over-estimated excitation temperatures of the 47 Tuc giants (see Section 4.1). Steenbock (1985) predicts that the non-LTE corrections for low excitation Fe i lines in Pollux are larger than for the high-excitation Fe i lines by about 0.03 dex. From our LTE calculations we estimate that the resulting excitation temperature difference would be of order 50 K. Thus, in order to obtain the over-estimated excitation temperatures in 47 Tuc giants, relative to Arcturus, it is necessary for the non-LTE abundance effect on Fe i in the 47 Tuc giants to be larger than Arcturus by about a factor of ∼2. Since 47 Tuc giants are more metal poor and slightly more luminous than Arcturus the 47 Tuc giants have more ionizing photons and fewer collisional de-excitations in the line-forming region than in Arcturus. Therefore, one might expect slightly greater non-LTE effects in the 47 Tuc giants, in the right sense to ultimately understand the LTE iron ionization equilibrium problem encountered here.

It is interesting to note that Ti ionization equilibrium does hold for our 47 Tuc stars, with a mean deviation Δepsilon(Ti i–Ti ii) of 0.00 ± 0.02 dex. However, for the coolest 47 Tuc red giant in our sample, the Ti i abundance is higher than Ti ii by 0.08 dex (1.6 σ). If we lower the adopted Teff of our 47 Tuc giants by ∼50 K then the Ti i–Ti ii abundance difference will decrease to −0.11 dex. Thus, we are unable to obtain ionization equilibrium for both Fe and Ti simultaneously, although a deficiency of Ti i relative to Ti ii might readily be understood as a consequence of non-LTE over-ionization of Ti. A more precise estimate of the effect of non-LTE on differential excitation temperatures in red giants, however, requires a detailed non-LTE study, which is beyond the scope of the current paper.

Finally, we note that the ionized species in the 47 Tuc TO star gives an abundance higher by 0.14 dex than the neutral one, while ionization equilibrium is well established in the reference dwarf star Hip 66815. Because of the similarity of Fe i and Fe ii, which deviate by a mere 0.02 dex, in the reference star, which has similar parameters to the 47 Tuc TO star, non-LTE can be eliminated as a possible explanation for the ionization imbalance in the 47 Tuc TO star. Thévenin & Idiart (1999) estimate that for subgiants and TO stars with Teff and log g similar to our sample a non-LTE treatment of the iron lines yields a [Fe/H] higher by ∼0.1 dex, which is close to the order of magnitude of the discrepancy seen in our star. However, Thévenin & Idiart (1999) did not include line opacities in their non-LTE calculations, which magnified the predicted non-LTE effects. We suggest that either the measured Fe ii lines in the 47 Tuc TO star are affected by noise spikes that bring them into detection in the low-S/N spectrum, or that the electron density in this star is higher than in Hip 66815, perhaps due to an unusual α enhancement.

5. ABUNDANCE ERROR ESTIMATES

In order to quantify the sensitivity of our derived abundances to the uncertainties in the atmospheric parameters, we performed a standard error analysis. For this purpose, we computed nine different atmosphere models including the following conservative changes in atmospheric parameters: Teff ±50 K, log g ±  0.2 dex (which is of the order of the maximum departure from ionization equilibrium observed in our stars), ξ ± 0.1 km s−1, and the input metallicity [M/H] by ±0.1 dex. We also included calculations with solar [α/Fe] ratios, using the Kurucz ODFNEW model atmospheres. We then derived abundances in the same manner as described in Sections 4.2 and 4.3 for the 47 Tuc TO star and the two red giant stars in our sample that cover the largest possible range of Teff and log g (stars #1 and #8). The resulting abundance deviations are illustrated in Table 8.

As can be seen from Table 8, our mean Fe i abundance values are largely insensitive to the choice of Teff. On the other hand, changes of log g mainly upset Fe ii and leave the neutral stage unscathed as is expected due to the strong gravity dependence of the ionization. Furthermore, there is only a negligible influence of the microturbulence and overall metallicity on the mean abundances.

In practice, the ∼40 K rms dispersion between 47 Tuc giant excitation Teff values and VK color Teff values (Section 4.2) suggests a random 1σ uncertainty for each Teff indicator near 30 K. Combining this in quadrature with the systematic Teff uncertainty for α Boo of the same order, we obtain a total Teff uncertainty of 42 K.

The distance modulus uncertainty, at 0.06 mag, dominates the uncertainty in the 47 Tuc giant Mv values. The combination of δMv and δTeff values results in typical mass uncertainties of 0.05 M, from placement of the giants onto the best-fitted BaSTI isochrone. For the stellar luminosities we include a BC uncertainty of 0.05 mag, based on the dependence of BC on atmospheric parameters, a V-band magnitude uncertainty of 0.02 mag and the distance modulus uncertainty of 0.06 mag. When these are combined in quadrature we obtained a total uncertainty in log L/L of 0.032 dex. Finally, in the gravity calculation of Equation (1) we adopted the total Teff uncertainty of 42 K, the luminosity uncertainty of 0.032 dex and the mass uncertainty of 0.05 M to obtain a 1σ uncertainty in log g of 0.043 dex; conservatively we adopt a value of ±0.05 dex for log g.

To determine the net effect of these actual parameter uncertainties on the final abundances we combine in quadrature the contributions from Teff and log g above, determined from Table 8, together with a 0.04 km s−1 uncertainty on ξ, based on the scatter of abundances in the EW versus epsilon(Fe) plot, a 0.05 dex uncertainty in the model atmosphere [M/H], and a 0.1 dex uncertainty in [α/Fe]. The latter corresponds to 1/4 of the abundance difference resulting from the use of ODFNEW versus AODFNEW model atmospheres. As a result, we find a total 1σ systematic abundance uncertainty of 0.04 dex for [Fe i/H] and 0.08 dex for [Fe ii/H]. One should keep in mind, however, that all atmospheric parameters are covariant to a certain extent (McWilliam et al. 1995a) so that our stated abundance uncertainties are upper limits.

We investigated the effect of the use of MARCS4 models (Gustafsson et al. 2003) on our derived abundances. The giant atmosphere models were computed with spherical geometry, so the abundances should be computed using this assumption; however, 2D radiative transfer is not currently available with MOOG. Therefore, in order to facilitate the use of MOOG for the abundance calculations we generated 1D equivalent models from the 2D MARCS grid. We found rather small differential abundance results, with Δepsilon(Kurucz) − Δepsilon(MARCS) = 0.03 dex for both Fe i and Fe ii lines. This minor abundance systematic would reduce the final abundances of our 47 Tuc stars if MARCS models were employed.

Listed in Tables 6 and 7 are also the statistical error in terms of the 1σ scatter of our measurements from individual lines and the numbers of lines employed to derive these abundances. In the case, where there is a sufficient amount of measurable lines in the spectra, i.e., for Fe i, the random error on the mean abundance is small compared to the one induced by the atmospheric uncertainties. Conversely, if only a handful of lines is present, such as for Fe ii, this statistical error will dominate. We find the random rms abundance scatter in the range of 0.03–0.12 dex, or typically ∼0.07 dex per line.

6. ABUNDANCE RESULTS

6.1. A New Metallicity Scale for 47 Tuc

From our entire sample of nine stars we find a mean iron abundance of [Fe i/H] = −0.76 ± 0.01 ± 0.04, where the first value gives the internal error, i.e., the standard deviation of the mean and the second number incorporates the systematic errors. At 0.03 dex, the star-to-star scatter within this cluster is very small and fully consistent with our estimated measurement errors, as is also seen in the recent spectroscopic data of Carretta et al. (2004) and Alves-Brito et al. (2005) as well in the photometric estimates of Hesser et al. (1987). In particular, our stars cover a range in [Fe i/H] from −0.82 to −0.72, Moreover, it is reassuring that the TO star yields an iron abundance that is in excellent agreement with the red giant sample, indicating that the chemical iron abundance in this cluster is independent of the stars' evolutionary status.

Apart from the early work of Brown & Wallerstein (1992), who derived a lower iron abundance of −0.81 dex, all previous studies have placed 47 Tuc toward the more metal-rich regime. For instance, Alves-Brito et al. (2005) found a [Fe/H] of (−0.66 ± 0.12) dex, and Kraft & Ivans (2003) found [Fe ii/H] = −0.79, based on an empirical calibration of Ca-triplet metallicities, but from a re-analysis of both the Brown & Wallerstein (1992) and Carretta & Gratton (1997) EWs they obtained −0.70 dex, based on corrections for their preferred models and log gf values. Moreover, the recent AGB star study of Wylie et al. (2006) argues in favor of the metal-richer regime in terms of [Fe/H] = (−0.60 ± 0.20) dex. While these estimates can still be considered to coincide with our value to within the quoted errorbars, it is more difficult to reconcile the result of (−0.67 ± 0.04) dex by Carretta et al. (2004) from their accurate analysis of 12 subgiant and dwarf stars with our data. Recently, McWilliam & Bernstein (2008) have obtained [Fe i/H] = −0.75 ± 0.03 dex based on an integrated-light analysis of the core of 47 Tuc. While the agreement with the present result was encouraging, the analysis method was radically different, except that McWilliam & Bernstein also performed a differential analysis relative to α Boo.

The main reason for discrepancies between our results and other studies can be sought in the different analysis method employed. Virtually all the previous works performed their analyses relying on the accuracy of the oscillator strength. Despite the availability of accurate laboratory log gf values (e.g., Blackwell et al. 1995), the use of these values in abundance studies of red giants may be fraught with peril (e.g., Prochaska et al. 2000), in particular, when the derived abundances are referenced to the solar abundance scale. We sidestepped such difficulties by performing our line-by-line differential analysis relative to Arcturus so that unavoidable systematic uncertainties, which may affect the different approaches, can be expected to have canceled out to first order. Examples of effects on standard abundance analysis that may, to first order, cancel out in our differential technique include errors in gf values, non-LTE effects, spherical versus plane parallel atmosphere geometry, inhomogeneous photospheres (granulation), three-dimensional hydrodynamics, and the effect of chromospheres.

One might argue that all the studies under scrutiny have focused on stars in different evolutionary stages, reaching from the unevolved early subgiants and dwarfs in the Carretta et al (2004) sample to AGB stars in the case of Wylie et al. (2006) and evolved red giants in the data of Alves Brito et al. (2005). However, all these works agree in that they do not find any considerable abundance spread with evolutionary status, and also we cannot confirm a significant difference between our red giant sample and the TO star's abundance ratios. Moreover, also our likely AGB star candidate (#3) is entirely consistent with the remainder of our iron results. Hence we conclude that the difference between our results and the previous works is not due to any target-selection effects.

6.2. Alpha-elements: O, Mg, Si, Ca, Ti

An overview of our resultant abundance ratios is provided in the Box-Whisker plot in Figure 4, which displays each element's mean, the 25- and 75% interquartile ranges as well as the full range covered. It turns out that each of Si, Ca, and Ti are similarly enhanced at ∼0.37 dex5. On the other hand, there is an indication that Mg shows even higher abundances for most of the stars, with an average of [Mg/Fe]∼0.45 dex. Oxygen is also enhanced more than Si, Ca, and Ti, in our 47 Tuc stars, with a mean [O/Fe] value, at +0.60 dex. These results are in excellent agreement with the abundances determined in the bulge giants of F07 with similar [Fe/H], as indicated by the filled circles in Figure 4. Overall, it is worth noticing that all of the [α/Fe] abundance ratios only show very little star-to-star variations, where the scatter does not exceed 0.06 dex for the elements considered here and can be purely explained by the random EW measurement errors of our analysis.

Figure 4.

Figure 4. Interquartile ranges of our derived abundance ratios. Shown as black dots for comparison are the results for Galactic bulge stars at comparable metallicities from F07.

Standard image High-resolution image

The abundance ratios for the TO star are consistent with those in the red giant sample, with the exception of [Mg/Fe], where the TO star yields an abundance lower by 0.12 dex, and for the case of [Si/Fe], with an abundance higher by 0.07 dex in the dwarf. We note that Si and Mg in dwarf stars are both sensitive to damping and the adopted stellar gravity; an overestimate of gravity would result in overabundances of these two elements. The question of why these two species show opposite deviations remains open, but it may indicate over-estimated EWs for Si, due either to blends or noise effects (see also Cohen et al. 2004).

The production of the α-elements is generally believed to occur in SNe ii, which are associated with the death of massive, short-lived stars. However, while Mg and O are believed to be formed during the hydrostatic nuclear burning phase in the SNe ii progenitors, Si, Ca, and Ti are generally assigned to the explosive nucleosynthetic phase of the SNe ii (e.g., Woosley & Weaver 1995). It is thus natural to expect different trends of for instance [Mg/Fe] as compared to [Si, Ca, Ti/Fe] as a function of [Fe/H]. Following F07, we investigate to what extent these groups of α-elements track each others trends: we plot in Figure 5 the difference of Ca and Si, Ca, and Ti i, respectively, with metallicity. It is reassuring that all of the explosive α-elements follow the identical trends with [Fe/H], which is reflected in that the aforementioned abundance ratios exhibit flat slopes with metallicity near solar values. At 0.04 ([Ca/Si]) and 0.05 dex ([Ca/Ti i]), the scatter around zero is small.

Figure 5.

Figure 5. A comparison of the [Ca/Si] and [Ca/Ti] abundance ratios for the 47 Tuc stars together with the Galactic bulge sample of F07, shown as open circles. A zero-point offset of −0.09 dex has been applied to the silicon data of F07. Typical 1σ random error bars are indicated.

Standard image High-resolution image

Again following F07 we consider the straight average [〈SiCaTi i〉/Fe] as a measure of explosive α-element abundance to reduce the overall scatter in these elements. Figure 6 shows this average abundance ratio in comparison with the bulge data of F07. Furthermore, this diagram incorporates a number of abundance ratios from the Galactic thin disk (Reddy et al. 2003; Bensby et al. 2005; Brewer & Carney 2006) and the thick disk (Prochaska et al. 2000; Fulbright 2000; Bensby et al. 2005; Brewer & Carney 2006).

Figure 6.

Figure 6. A run of the averaged α-element abundance ratio versus iron. The solid circles and open star symbol denote the 47 Tuc red giants and the TO star, respectively, derived in this work. Additionally shown are observations of Galactic stars from the literature, where open circles show the bulge giants of F07, thick-disk stars (Prochaska et al. 2000; Fulbright 2000; Bensby et al. 2005; Brewer & Carney 2006) are displayed as open triangles and thin-disk stars (Reddy et al. 2003; Bensby et al. 2005; Brewer & Carney 2006) are shown as crosses. A typical error bar is indicated toward the lower left.

Standard image High-resolution image

As was shown by F07 the Galactic bulge is clearly separated from the thin disk in the α-elements by ∼+0.2 dex, and the bulge [α/Fe] ratio shows a distinct decline with increasing metallicity. This picture is generally interpreted in terms of a higher SNe ii/SNe Ia ratio in the bulge, indicating an increased importance of massive stars for the evolution of the bulge, and addition of iron from long-lived SNe Ia at higher [Fe/H] than for the thin disk. The Galactic thick-disk α-abundances, on the other hand, are significantly lower than the bulge values at [Fe/H] ∼−0.5, while these two components converge toward the enhanced [α/Fe] ratio at metallicities around −1. How does 47 Tuc now fit into this picture? As Figure 6 implies, this cluster is clearly strongly enhanced in its α-elements and inconsistent with an association with the thin disk. At a metallicity of [Fe/H] = −0.76, the cluster stars occupy a region in [α/Fe] that is higher than most thick-disk stars, and consistent with the bulge composition. And yet, at this [Fe/H], the bulge [<SiCaTi i >/Fe] value is higher than the thick-disk population by only ∼0.1 dex. Thus, while the mean 47 Tuc [〈SiCaTi i〉/Fe] ratio is similar to the bulge, there is a small overlap with the composition of thick-disk stars.

The fact that [Mg/Fe] in the bulge is higher on average than the explosive α-elements' abundance ratios was first noted by McWilliam & Rich (1994) and later confirmed by F07. This enhancement as well as only a negligible decline of [Mg/Fe] with [Fe/H] was interpreted by a rapid formation of the bulge (Matteucci et al. 1999). Also [Mg/Fe] in the 47 Tuc stars shows an excess of ∼+0.1 dex relative to the [Si, Ca, Ti/Fe] group (Figure 4 and the bottom panel of Figure 7), while [O/Fe] has an excess of ∼0.2 dex. This is in accord with the conclusion of F07 that explosive and hydrostatic α-elements show different trends in the bulge, as is also seen in the dwarf galaxy abundances (see the review by Venn et al. 2004). As mentioned in F07 part of the reason for the lower enhancement of the [Si,Ca,Ti/Fe] relative to the hydrostatic alphas is that SNe Ia are thought to produce small amounts of Si, Ca, and Ti so that ratios taken relative to the solar composition are lower because of the SNe Ia contribution of these elements in the Sun.

Figure 7.

Figure 7. Same as Figure 6, but for the [Al/Fe] (top panel) and [Mg/Fe] (lower panel) abundance ratios.

Standard image High-resolution image

6.3. Aluminum and Sodium

The first obvious thing to note is that both Na and Al are enhanced (by +0.2 and +0.45 dex, respectively) in 47 Tuc. While the [Na/Fe] enhancement is in good agreement with that found in previous studies (Brown & Wallerstein 1992; Norris & Da Costa 1995; Carretta et al. 2004; James et al. 2004; Alves-Brito et al. 2005), these works do not support evidence for an average [Al/Fe] in excess of 0.38 dex, with the exception of Brown & Wallerstein, who yield an estimate of +0.67. Generally, a wide range of [Al/Fe] ratios for various stellar systems is not uncommon and globular cluster giants have been reported to reach maximum enhancements in excess of +1 dex (McWilliam 1997; Ivans et al. 1999).

The top panel of Figure 7 shows our derived [Al/Fe] abundances; note that the raw [Al/Fe] bulge abundances of F07 are used the comparison. In a similar plot F07 shifted their [Al/Fe] ratios lower to account for zero-point differences between studies of disk dwarfs and giants. However, as indicated in F07, non-LTE effects on the [Al/Fe] ratios in the dwarf studies are probably to blame for the shift, so the dwarf results should have been corrected upward, although the amount depends on the stellar temperatures. The F07 bulge giant [Al/Fe] ratios should have remained unaltered. Thus, in the top panel of Figure 7 the thin- and thick-disk results, which were based on dwarf stars, should be increased by an average of 0.08 dex. Figure 7 shows that our mean [Na/Fe] and [Al/Fe] ratios for 47 Tuc are at the upper end of the distributions found in the bulge, but also compatible with the, few, thick-disk stars in this metallicity regime.

Although both the light elements Na and Al are also produced by SNe ii, the trends with metallicity are clearly distinguished from those found for the other α-elements discussed in the previous section (see F07 for a review). While the Galactic thin- and thick-disk abundance ratios exhibit a smooth but slow decline with increasing [Fe/H], which is due to the continuous pollution by SNe ii and a late addition of SNe Ia processed material into the ISM, [Al/Fe] in the bulge shows the opposite trend. This can be understood in terms of the production of significantly less iron in the Galactic bulge environment.

Given the same line of reasoning as for the traditional enhancement of Na and Al in the Galactic bulge, we can argue that the material, out of which 47 Tuc formed, had lesser iron contributions from SNe Ia, but more important, the Al and Na yields are slightly more increased at the metallicity of 47 Tuc. This could have occurred as a result of an overly high neutron excess (Arnett 1971) or an increased fraction of high-mass stars in the population that produced the 47 Tuc composition. In this context Vuissoz et al. (2004) suggest that rotating Wolf–Rayet stars can provide increased Al yields. However, the presence of material from more massive SNe ii events should result in higher [O&Mg] ratios in 47 Tuc than the bulge, which we do not observe.

Again, the lowest [Al/Fe] is found for the TO star and the AGB-star candidate #3. Non-LTE calculations for Al in dwarf stars by Baumueller & Gehren (1997) indicate a correction of +0.09 dex for the Al I lines we used in the TO star. If this correction is applied to the TO star, the [Al/Fe] ratio increases to +0.42 dex, similar to the mean value of +0.47 for the 47 Tuc giants. Similar calculations for Na (Baumueller et al. 1998; Takeda et al. 2003) indicate downward corrections to the TO star Na abundance of approximately 0.06 dex. While these non-LTE corrections bring the TO star and giants into better agreement it must be remembered that, in order to obtain absolute abundance ratios, non-LTE treatment needs to be considered for all element species, including Fe. This holds for the TO star, the RGB stars, and the Sun, but such a treatment is beyond the scope of the current paper.

We note in passing that there is no clear evidence of the Mg–Al anti-correlation (Langer & Hoffmann 1995) present in our data, which would be indicative of the occurrence of deep mixing processes in globular cluster stars. This finding is also consistent with the result of Carretta et al. (2004).

On the other hand, we cannot exclude the possibility that Na and O anti-correlate in 47 Tuc (Figure 8). Such a trend was suggested to occur also in this metal-rich cluster (e.g., Carretta et al. 2004), and to be present across all stellar evolutionary stages. The canonical picture to explain this abundance anomaly is the occurrence of internal deep mixing during the first dredge-up. Our data cover only a small range in the [O/Fe] abundances, but it is clear that the star with the highest depletion in oxygen is accordingly enhanced in Na by about 0.15 dex above average. All in all, there is a large scatter present in the [Na/O] abundance ratio (at an rms of 0.11 dex) and the object with the highest enhancement in [Na/Fe] appears to fall into the thin-disk regime. Moreover, in the phase space of sodium versus oxygen (Figure 8, bottom) the over-abundance of sodium coincides with the upper end of the bulge and thick-disk abundances, which is, however, hampered by the sparse sampling of thick-disk stars in this regime. The general enhancement of Na in 47 Tuc can then also be understood, if, as for the case of the Galactic bulge, there was a primordial source for the Na production available (F07).

Figure 8.

Figure 8. Anti-correlation of the sodium and oxygen abundances. The symbols and sources of the data are the same as in Figures 6 and 7.

Standard image High-resolution image

7. SUMMARY & DISCUSSION

In this work we have determined the chemical abundance ratios of eight red giants and one TO star in the Galactic globular cluster 47 Tuc. By focusing on the derivation of the O, Na, Mg, Al, Si, Ca, and Ti abundances, we could investigate the properties of those elements usually associated with their production in the massive SNe ii events. One major improvement of the present work compared to previous studies is the differential line-by-line abundance analysis relative to a reference star with similar temperature, gravity, and metallicity as the target stars. By thus referencing our measurements to the red giant Arcturus and a field dwarf, we could efficiently reduce undesired uncertainties in the stellar model atmospheres and prevent potentially erratic atomic parameters, thereby achieving a high degree of accuracy in our abundance results. By means of detailed isochrone fits, we estimated Arcturus' mass and age to be 1.0 M and 9 Gyr, confirming its nature as a first ascent RGB star. Our derived mean LTE [Fe/H] of −0.76 ±0.01 ±0.04 is more metal-poor by about 0.10 dex than recent results in the literature. This new accurate measurement will enable future age determinations of this globular cluster to an unprecedented accuracy and can also be employed to establish the new metallicity scale with 47 Tuc as a template of the metal-rich cluster.

We confirmed that the explosive α-elements Si, Ca, and Ti trace each others abundance trends, which lends support to their common production site in the explosive phase of the SNe ii events. Magnesium, however is enhanced relative to these elements. We find that [Al/Fe] and [Na/Fe] ratios in 47 Tuc lie on the upper bound of the distribution seen in Galactic bulge stars of similar metallicity. Our data show a mild evidence of a Na–O anti-correlation in that the stars with lower [O/Fe] are slightly enhanced by 0.1 dex in [Na/Fe]. Comparable relations of Mg with Al could not be confirmed.

All of the abundance trends we found are inconsistent with those seen in the Galactic thin disk, which suggests that 47 Tuc, like the Galactic bulge and thick disk, was presumably subject to a rapid formation with very little contributions from the long-lived SNe Ia. There is no a priori reason to assume that this cluster should bear any association with either the bulge or the thick-disk component. On the other hand, most of chemical abundance trends indicate that 47 Tuc exhibits bulge-like properties, such as the overall α-enhancement, its over-abundance of Mg and in particular the mild enhancement in [Na/Fe] at the stars' [O/Fe] metallicities. If 47 Tuc in fact formed from bulge material, it must have been subject to a rapid formation period and accompanying enrichment. It is worth noting that the scatter in essentially all the abundance ratios is quite small and most likely solely due to the random EW measurement errors. This points to the cluster having formed and evolved in a homogeneous environment.

One drawback of the bulge scenario are the cluster's present day large Galactocentric distance (RGC = 7.4 kpc; Harris 1996) and its height below the plane (Z = 3.2 kpc) that makes a correlation with the bulge less likely. Moreover, its pericenter at 5.2 kpc and its low eccentricity orbit (e ∼ 0.16; Dinescu et al. 1999) render it unlikely that its origin has been close to the Galactic bulge, whereas an initial thick-disk connection cannot be ruled out at present. In this context, the heavy elements measured by Alves-Brito et al. (2005) suggest that 47 Tuc cannot be unequivocally assigned to either of the thin-disk, bulge or halo globular cluster population as established by Zinn (1985), but rather should be associated with the Galactic thick disk. In fact, also our overall abundance results could sustain this view, since the average [X/Fe] ratios we measured partially overlap with those from the thick disk.

The formation of the thick disk is nowadays believed to be related to a dissipationless merger event that heated the early thin disk (Walker et al. 1996; Prochaska et al. 2000; Gilmore et al. 2002; Feltzing et al. 2003; Wyse et al. 2006). In this context it is possible that 47 Tuc formed out of the material that later on constituted the heated disk. According to Bensby et al. (2004), thick-disk stars in the metallicity regime of 47 Tuc exhibit typical ages older than 11 Gyr, which is also consistent with 47 Tuc's age of ≳11 Gyr (e.g., Liu & Chaboyer 2000; Grundahl et al. 2002; Gratton et al. 2003). Alternatively, the cluster could have formed from material that was stripped from the infalling satellite and subsequently dispersed into the newly formed disk, or it might have already been in place in the infalling satellite and then been tidally stripped. Yet some of the abundance trends that we find defy a simple allocation of 47 Tuc to the thick disk; for instance, the high [Al/Fe] ratio in the globular cluster are at odds with the significant enrichment by SNe Ia in the disk as reported (e.g., by Prochaska et al. (2000); Feltzing et al. (2003)) and at this stage we refrain from over-interpreting any association due to the sparse sampling of thick-disk stars around 47 Tuc's metallicity in the literature.

We gratefully acknowledge funding for this work from a NASA-SIM key project grant, entitled "Anchoring the Population II Distance Scale: Accurate Ages for Globular Clusters and Field Halo Stars." This research has made the use of the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Footnotes

Please wait… references are loading.
10.1088/0004-6256/135/4/1551