Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-21T05:09:40.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reduction in Nosocomial Transmission of Drug-Resistant Bacteria After Introduction of an Alcohol-Based Handrub

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Fred M. Gordin ,
Maureen E. Schultz ,
Ruth A Huber  and
Janet A. Gill
Fred M. Gordin*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC
Maureen E. Schultz
Affiliation:
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC
Ruth A Huber
Affiliation:
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC
Janet A. Gill
Affiliation:
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC
*
Infectious Diseases (151B), VA Medical Center, 50 Irving Street NW, Washington, DC 20422.Fred.Gordin@med.va.gov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To assess quantitatively the clinical impact of using an alcohol-based handrub (ABHR) in the hospital environment, measuring impact as the incidence of new, nosocomial isolates of drug-resistant organisms.

Design:

An observational survey from 1998 to 2003 comparing the first 3 years of no ABHR use with the 3 years following, when an ABHR was provided for hand hygiene.

Setting:

An inner-city, tertiary-care medical center.

Intervention:

At baseline, an antimicrobial soap with 0.3% triclosan was provided for staff hand hygiene. The intervention was placement in all inpatient and all outpatient clinic rooms of wall-mounted dispensers of an ABHR with 62.5% ethyl alcohol. Data were collected on change in the incidence of three drug-resistant bacteria.

Results:

During the 6 years of the survey, all new, nosocomially acquired isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea were recorded. On comparison of the first 3 years with the final 3 years, there was a 21% decrease in new, nosocomially acquired MRSA (90 to 71 isolates per year; P = .01) and a 41% decrease in VRE (41 to 24 isolates per year; P < .001). The incidence of new isolates of C. difficile was essentially unchanged.

Conclusion:

In the 3 years following implementation of an ABHR, this hospital experienced the value of reductions in the incidence of nosocomially acquired drug-resistant bacteria. These reductions provide clinical validation of the recent CDC recommendation that ABHRs be the primary choice for hand decontamination. (Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005;26:650-653)

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 26 , Issue 7 , July 2005 , pp. 650 - 653
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Jarvis, WR. Selected aspects of the socioeconomic impact of nosocomial infections: morbidity, mortality, cost, and prevention. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:552–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Larson, E. Skin hygiene and infection prevention: more of the same or different approaches? Clin Infect Dis 1999;29:1287–1294.Google Scholar
3.Steere, AC, Mallison, GF. Handwashing practices for the prevention of nosocomial infections. Ann Intern Med 1975;83:683–690.Google Scholar
4.Garner, JS, Favero, MS. Guideline for handwashing and hospital environmental control, 1985. Infect Control 1986;7:231–243.Google Scholar
5.Larson, EL. APIC guideline for handwashing and hand antisepsis in health care settings. Am J Infect Control 1995;23:251–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Garner, JS, Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:53–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. MMWR 2002;51(RR-16):1–45.Google Scholar
8.McNeil, SA, Foster, CL, Hedderwick, SA, Kauffman, C. Effect of hand cleansing with antimicrobial soap or alcohol-based gel on microbial colonization of artificial fingernails worn by health care workers. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:367–372.Google Scholar
9.Goroncy-Bermes, P, Schouten, MA, Voss, A. In vitro activity of a non-medicated handwash product, Chlorhexidine, and an alcohol-based hand disinfectant against multiply-resistant gram-positive microorganisms. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:194–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Girou, E, Loyeau, S, Legrand, P, Oppein, F, Brun-Buisson, C. Efficacy of handrubbing with alcohol based solution versus standard handwashing with antiseptic soap: randomized clinical trial. Br Med J 2002;325:362–365.Google Scholar
11.Trick, WE, Vernon, MO, Hayes, RA, et al.Impact of ring wearing on hand contamination and comparison of hand hygiene agents in a hospital. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:1383–1390.Google Scholar
12.Pittet, D, Mourouga, P, Perneger, TV. Compliance with handwashing in a teaching hospital. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:126–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Pittet, D. Improving adherence to hand hygiene practice: a multidisci-plinary approach. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:234–240.Google Scholar
14.Doebbeling, BN, Stanley, GL, Sheetz, CT, et al.Comparative efficacy of alternative hand-washing agents in reducing nosocomial infections in intensive care units. N Engl J Med 1992;327:88–93.Google Scholar
15.Parienti, JJ, Thibon, P, Heller, R, et al.Hand-rubbing with an aqueous alcoholic solution vs traditional surgical hand-scrubbing and 30-day surgical site infection rates. JAMA 2002;288:722–727.Google Scholar
16.Pittet, D, Hugonnet, S, Harbath, S, et al.Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Lancet 2000;356:1307–1312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.McDonald, LC. Hand hygiene in the new millennium: drawing the distinction between efficacy and effectiveness. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:157–159.Google Scholar
18.Boyce, JM. It is time for action: improving hand hygiene in hospilals. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:153–154.Google Scholar
19.Widmer, AF. Replace hand washing with use of a waterless alcohol hand rub? Clin Infect Dis 2000;31:136–143.Google Scholar
20.Boyce, JM, Kelliher, S, Vallande, N. Skin irritation and dryness associated with two hand-hygiene regimens: soap-and-water hand washing versus hand antisepsis with an alcoholic hand gel. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:422–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Kramer, A, Bernig, T, Kampf, G. Clinical double-blind trial on the dermal tolerance and user acceptability of six alcohol-based hand disinfectants for hygienic hand disinfection. J Hosp Infect 2002:51:114–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Harbarth, S, Martin, Y, Rohner, P, Henry, N, Auckenthaler, R, Pittet, D. Effect of delayed infection control measures on a hospital outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Hosp Infect 2000;46:43–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed