Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T04:11:21.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fulling Non-uniqueness and the Unruh Effect: A Primer on Some Aspects of Quantum Field Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Abstract

We discuss the intertwined topics of Fulling non-uniqueness and the Unruh effect. The Fulling quantization, which is in some sense the natural one for an observer uniformly accelerated through Minkowski spacetime to adopt, is often heralded as a quantization of the Klein-Gordon field which is both physically relevant and unitarily inequivalent to the standard Minkowski quantization. We argue that the Fulling and Minkowski quantizations do not constitute a satisfactory example of physically relevant, unitarily inequivalent quantizations, and indicate what it would take to settle the open question of whether a satisfactory example exists. A popular gloss on the Unruh effect has it that an observer uniformly accelerated through the Minkowski vacuum experiences a thermal flux of Rindler quanta. Taking the Unruh effect, so glossed, to establish that the notion of particle must be relativized to a reference frame, some would use it to demote the particle concept from fundamental status. We explain why technical results do not support the popular gloss and why the attempted demotion of the particle concept is both unsuccessful and unnecessary. Fulling non-uniqueness and the Unruh effect merit attention despite these negative verdicts because they provide excellent vehicles for illustrating key concepts of quantum field theory and for probing foundational issues of considerable philosophical interest.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We are indebted to Jeremy Butterfield, Rob Clifton, and Carlo Rovelli for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. We also wish to thank the anonymous referees for criticisms and suggestions that led to substantive improvements.

References

Arageorgis, A., Earman, J., and Ruetsche, L. (2002), “Weyling the Time Away: The Non-Unitary Implementability of Quantum Field Dynamics on Curved Spacetime,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33B:151184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araki, H. (1964), “Type of von Neumann Algebra Associated with Free Field,” Progress of Theoretical Physics 32:956965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J. (2000), “On the Nature of Measurement Records in Relativistic Quantum Field Theory,” PhilSci Archive (http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu)00000197.Google Scholar
Belinski $\breve{\mathrm{i}}$ V. A., Karnakov, B. M., Mur, V. D., and Narozhnyi, N. B. (1997), “Does the Unruh Effect Exist?JETP Letters 65:902908.Google Scholar
Belinski$\breve{\mathrm{i}}$ V. A., Karnakov, B. M., Mur, V. D., and Narozhnyi, N. B. (1999), “On The Theory of the Unruh Effect,” in Piran, T. and Ruffini, R. (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Marcel Grossman Meeting on General Relativity. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Birrell, N. D., and Davies, P. C. W. (1981), Quantum Fields in Curved Spacetime, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bratteli, O., and Robinson, D. W. (1979), Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics. I. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratteli, O., and Robinson, D. W. (1996), Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics. II. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Cavallero, S., Morchio, G., and Strocchi, F. (1999), “A Generalization of the Stone-von Neumann Theorem to Nonregular Representations of the CCR-Algebra,” Letters in Mathematical Physics 47:307320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chmielowski, P. (1994), “States of a Scalar Field on Spacetimes with Two Isometries with Timelike Orbits,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 11:4156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifton, R., and Halvorson, H. (2001), “Are Rindler Quanta Real?British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52:417470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, P. C. W. (1984), “Particles Do Not Exist,” in Quantum Theory of Gravity, edited by S. M. Christensen. 66–77. Bristol: Adam Hilger.Google Scholar
DeWitt, B. S. (1979), “Quantum Field Theory on Curved Spacetime,” Physics Reports 19:295357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimock, J. (1980), “Algebras of Local Observables on a Manifold,” Communications in Mathematical Physics 77:219228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowker, J. S. (1978), “Thermal Properties of Green’s Functions in Rindler, de Sitter, and Schwarzschild Spaces,” Physical Review D 18:18561860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earman, J. (1995), Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers, and Shrieks: Singularities and Acausalities in Relativistic Spacetimes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Earman, J., and Eisenstaedt, J. (1999). “Einstein and Singularities,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 30:185235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, A., and Rosen, N. (1935), “The Particle Problem in General Relativity,” Physical Review 48:7378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedetov, A.M., Mur, V. D., Narozhny, N. B., Belinski, V. A. $\breve{\mathrm{i}}$ , and Karnakov, B. M. (1999), “Quantum Field Aspect of the Unruh Effect,” Physics Letters A 254:126132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulling, S. A. (1972), “Scalar Quantum Field in a Closed Universe of Constant Curvature,” PhD dissertation, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Fulling, S. A. (1973), “Nonuniqueness of Canonical Field Quantization in Riemannian Space-Time,” Physical Review D 7:28502862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulling, S. A. (1989), Aspects of Quantum Field Theory on Curved Spacetime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, V. L., and Frolov, V. P. (1987), “Vacuum in Homogeneous Gravitational Field and Excitation of a Uniformly Accelerated Detector,” Soviet Physics. Uspecki. 30:10731095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huggett, N. (2000), “Survey: Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Field Theory,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51:617628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, B. S. (1978), “Linear Spin-Zero Quantum Fields in External Gravitational and Scalar Fields,” Communications in Mathematical Physics 62:5570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, B. S. (1985), “The Double Wedge Algebra for Quantum Fields on Schwarzschild and Minkowski Spacetimes,” Communications in Mathematical Physics 100:5781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, B. S., and Wald, R. M. (1991), “Theorems on the Uniqueness and Thermal Properties of Stationary, Nonsingular, Quasifree States on Spacetimes with a Bifurcate Killing Horizon,” Physics Reports 207:49136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letaw, J. R. (1981), “Stationary World Lines and the Vacuum Excitation of Noninertial Detectors,” Physical Review D 23:17091714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letaw, J. R., and Pfautsch, J. D. (1980), “Quantized scalar field in rotating coordinates,” Physical Review D 22:13451351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letaw, J. R., and Pfautsch, J. D. (1981), “Quantized Scalar Field in the Stationary Coordinate Systems of Flat Spacetime,” Physical Review D 24:14911498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padamanabhan, T. (1982), “General Covariance, Accelerated Frames and the Particle Concept,” Astrophysics and Space Science 83:247268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peskin, M. E., and Schroeder, D. V. (1995), An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Rindler, W. (1969), Essential Relativity: Special, General, and Cosmological. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sciama, D. W., Candela, P., and Deutch, D. (1981), “Quantum Field Theory, Horizons and Thermodynamics,” Advances in Physics 30:327366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, G. L. (1982), “Quantum Fields on Manifolds: PCT and Gravitationally Induced Thermal States,” Annals of Physics 141:210224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, G. L. (1986), Quantum Theory of Collective Phenomena. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sriramkumar, L., and Padamanabhan, T. (1996), “Finite-Time Response of Inertial and Uniformly Accelerated Unruh-DeWitt Detectors,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 13:20612079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sriramkumar, L., and Padamanabhan, T. (2002), “Probes of the Vacuum Structure of Quantum Fields in Classical Backgrounds,” International Journal of Modern Physics D 11:134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmann, O. (1968), “Particle Localization in Field Theory,” Communications in Mathematical Physics 7:112137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takagi, S. (1986), “Vacuum Noise and Stress Induced by Uniform Acceleration.Progress of Theoretical Physics, Supplement No. 88:1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teller, P. (1995), An Interpretative Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thirring, W. (1980), Quantum Mechanics of Large Systems. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Troost, W., and Dam, H. van (1979), “Thermal Propagators and Accelerated Frames of Reference,” Nuclear Physics B 152:442460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unruh, W. H. (1976), “Notes on Back Hole Evaporation,” Physical Review D 14:870892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unruh, W. H. (1990), “Particles and Fields,” in Audretsch, J. and Sabbata, V. de (eds.), Quantum Mechanics in Curved Spacetime, pp. 89110. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unruh, W. H., and Wald, R. M. (1984), “What Happens When an Accelerating Observer Detects a Rindler Particle,” Physical Review D 29:10471056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verch, R. (1994), “Local Definitetness, Primitivity, and Quasiequivalence of Quasi-free Hadamard Quantum States in Curved Spacetime,” Communications in Mathematical Physics 160:507536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wald, R. M. (1984). General Relativity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wald, R. M. (1994). Quantum Field Theory on Curved Spacetime. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar