Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-30T19:26:25.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metabolism of dietary fibre components in man assessed by breath hydrogen and methane

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

K. Tadesse  and
M. A. Eastwood
K. Tadesse
Affiliation:
Wolfson Laboratories, Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU
M. A. Eastwood
Affiliation:
Wolfson Laboratories, Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Breath hydrogen and methane were measured in eight normal individuals after acute and separate administration of different chemical components of dietary fibre.

2. Hemicellulose, raffinose and lactulose increased H2 production, while cellulose, pectin and lignin did not. Methane production was found to be individual and unaffected by any of the substances. Differences in physical properties of the same chemicals appear to have no influences on H2 and CH4 production.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , September 1978 , pp. 393 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1978

References

Bond, J. H., Engel, R. R. & Levitt, M. D. (1970). Gastroenterology 58, 1035.Google Scholar
Calloway, D. H., Colasito, D. J. & Mathew, R. D. (1966). Nature, Lond. 212, 1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calloway, D. H. & Murphy, E. L. (1969). Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 150, 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, J. H. (1973). Gut 14, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, J. H. (1976). In Fiber in Human Nutrition, p. 1 [Spiller, G. A. and Amen, R. J., editors]. New York and London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Gray, C. T. & Gest, H. (1965). Science, N.Y. 148, 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, G., Gassull, M. A., Leeds, A. R., Blendis, L. M. & Jenkins, D. J. A. (1976). Clin. Sci. mol. Med. 50, 237.Google Scholar
Newman, A. (1974). Gut 15, 308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southgate, D. A. T., Branch, W. J., Hill, M. J., Drasar, B. S., Walters, R. L., Davies, B. S. & Baird, I. M. (1976). Metabolism 25, 1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trowell, H. (1974). Lancet i, 503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werch, S. C. & Ivy, A. C. (1941). Am. J. Dig. Dis. 8, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. D. & Olmsted, W. H. (1936). J. Nutr. 11, 433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar