Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T12:56:34.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Profitability and risk of organic production systems in the northern Great Plains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2007

Elwin G. Smith ,
M. Jill Clapperton  and
Robert E. Blackshaw
Elwin G. Smith*
Affiliation:
Environmental Health, Lethbridge Research Centre, PO Box 3000, Lethbridge, AB, T1J 4B1, Canada.
M. Jill Clapperton
Affiliation:
Environmental Health, Lethbridge Research Centre, PO Box 3000, Lethbridge, AB, T1J 4B1, Canada.
Robert E. Blackshaw
Affiliation:
Sustainable Production Systems, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre, PO Box 3000, Lethbridge, AB, T1J 4B1, Canada.
*
*Corresponding author: smithel@agr.gc.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Organic crop production systems are increasingly being adopted by producers in the northern Great Plains. This study evaluated the expected net returns and risk of organic crop rotations, compared to conventional rotations. Field plot data of organic and conventional crop rotations were used to determine the net returns of the systems, using four different levels of premiums for organic produce. The risk of returns was evaluated using estimated cumulative density functions and stochastic dominance. The most profitable organic rotation required high price premiums to dominate the most profitable conventional rotation. However, the most profitable organic rotation dominated some conventional rotations that are commonly used in the northern Great Plains. The organic rotations had slightly higher risk, but the relative risk of rotations had little impact on the optimal rotation.

Keywords

organiccrop rotationnet returnsstochastic dominance
Type
Research Article
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , September 2004 , pp. 152 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development (AAFRD) 2000. Alberta organic farming operations 2000 survey results (Final). http://www.agric.gov.ab.ca/economic/stats/organic_survey/whole_document.pdf (verified 30 March 2004).Google Scholar
2United States Department of Agriculture 2002. http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/organic/#tables (verified 31 March 2004, submit ‘Certified organic and total U.S. acreage, selected crops, 1995–2001’).Google Scholar
3Loureiro, M.L., McCluskey, J.J. and Mittelhammer, R.C. 2001. Assessing consumer preferences for organic, eco-labelled, and regular apples. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 26(2): 404–416.Google Scholar
4Dimitri, C. and Greene, C. 2002. Recent growth patterns in the U.S. organic foods market. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Market Trade Economics Division and Resource Economics Division, Agriculture Information Bulletin Number 777.Google Scholar
5Batte, M.T., Forster, D.L. and Hitzhusen, F.J. 1993. Organic agriculture in Ohio: An economic perspective. Journal of Production Agriculture 6(4): 536–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Clark, S., Klonsky, K., Livingston, P. and Temple, S. 1999. Crop-yield and economic comparisons of organic low-input, and conventional farming systems in California's Sacramento Valley. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 14(3): 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Lu, Y.-C., Watkins, B. and Teasdale, J. 1999. Economic analysis of sustainable agricultural cropping systems for mid-Atlantic States. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 15(2/3): 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Jans, S. and Fernandez-Cornejo, J. 2001. The economics of organic farming in the USA: The case of tomato production. Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, 5–8 August 2001, Chicago, IL. http://agecon.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/pdf_view.pl?paperid=2799& ftype=.pdf (verified 31 March 2004).Google Scholar
9Hanson, J.C., Lichtenberg, E. and Peters, S.E. 1997. Organic versus conventional grain production in the mid-Atlantic: An economic and farming system overview. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 12(1): 2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Welsh, R. 2000. The Economics of Organic Grain and Soybean Production in the Midwestern United States. Henry A. Wallace Institute for Alternative Agriculture, Greenbelt, MD.Google Scholar
11Smolik, J.D., Dobbs, T.L. and Rickerl, D.H. 1995. The relative sustainability of alternative, conventional, and reduced-till farming systems. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 10(1): 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12O'Riordan, T. and Cobb, D. 2001. Assessing the consequences of converting to organic agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Economics 52(1): 22–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Schneeberger, W., Darnhofer, I. and Eder, M. 2002. Barriers to the adoption of organic farming by cash-crop producers in Austria. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 17(1): 1–8.Google Scholar
14Fowler, S.M. 2000. No easy route to profits. Organic Farming 67Autumn:27–29.Google Scholar
15Smith, E.G. and Zentner, R.P. 2003. Cropping systems and risk in the semi-arid Northern Great Plains. In Hanson, J.D. and Krupinsky, J.M. (eds). Dynamic Cropping Systems Symposium: Principles, Processes, and Challenges. Proceedings of a Cropping Systems Symposium, 4–7 August 2003, Bismarck, ND. p. 144–154.Google Scholar
16Clapperton, J., David, M., Blackshaw, B., Smith, E., Conner, B., Osler, G., Kanashiro, D., and Mir, Z. 2002. Flexible dryland cropping systems for long-term sustainable agriculture. Lethbridge Research Centre, AARI Final Report Project Number 19990062, November, Lethbridge, Alberta.Google Scholar
17Zentner, R.P., Wall, D.D., Brandt, S.A., Ulrich, D. and Sonntag, G.J. 2001. Economics of alternative input use and crop diversity strategies in the Dark Brown soil zone of Saskatchewan. In Proceedings of the Soils and Crops Workshop 2001, 22–23 February. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK. p. 18–29.Google Scholar
18Hardaker, J.B., Huirne, R.B.M. and Anderson, J.R. 1997. Coping with Risk in Agriculture. CAB International Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
19Taylor, C.R. 1984. A flexible method for empirically estimating probability functions. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 9(1): 66–76.Google Scholar
20Moffit, L.J. 2002. Characterizing uncertain outcomes with the restricted HT transformation. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 34(3): 417–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Karlen, D.L., Duffy, M.D. and Colvin, T.S. 1995. Nutrient, labour, energy, and economic evaluations of two farming systems in Iowa. Journal of Production Agriculture 8(4): 540–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Smith, E.G. and Young, D.L. 2000. Requiem for summer fallow in western North America? Choices First Quarter:24–25.Google Scholar