This paper shows how understanding in interaction is informed by temporality, and in particular, by the workings of retrospection. Understanding is a temporally extended, sequentially organized process. Temporality, namely, the sequential relationship of turn positions, equips participants with default mechanisms to display understandings and to expect such displays. These mechanisms require local management of turn-taking to be in order, i.e., the possibility and the expectation to respond locally and reciprocally to prior turns at talk. Sequential positions of turns in interaction provide an infrastructure for displaying understanding and accomplishing intersubjectivity. Linguistic practices specialized in displaying particular kinds of (not) understanding are adapted to the individual sequential positions with respect to an action-to-be-understood.
1991Der Text und seine Verknüpfungen: Studien zur psychoanalytischen Methode. Berlin: Springer.
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1981 “Discourse in the Novel.” In his The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Translated by Michael Holquist and Caryl Emerson. 259–422. Austin, TX: U Texas P.
Bergmann, Jörg R
1985 “Flüchtigkeit und methodische Fixierung sozialer Wirklichkeit: Aufzeichnungen als Daten interpretativer Soziologie.” In Entzauberte Wissenschaft. Zur Relativität und Geltung soziologischer Forschung, ed. by Wolfgang Bonß and Heinz Hartmann, 299–320. Göttingen: Schwartz.
Betz, Emma, Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm, Veronika Drake, et al.
2013 “Third-Position Repeats in German: The Case of Repair- and Request-for-Information Sequences.” Gesprächsforschung 14: 133–166, [URL].
Clark, Herbert H
1996Using Language. Cambridge: CUP.
Clark, Herbert H. and Susan A. Brennan
1991 “Grounding in Communication.” In Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, ed. by Lauren B. Resnick, John M. Levine, and Stephanie D. Teasley, 127–149. Washington: APA.
Deppermann, Arnulf
2011 “Notionalizations: The Transformation of Descriptions into Categorizations.” Human Studies 34 (2): 155–181.
Deppermann, Arnulf
2012 “How Does ‘Cognition’ Matter to the Analysis of Talk-in-Interaction?” Language Sciences 34 (6): 746–767.
Deppermann, Arnulf
2013 “Turn-Design at Turn-Beginnings: Multimodal Resources to Deal with Tasks of Turn-Construction in German.” Journal of Pragmatics 46 (1): 91–121.
Deppermann, Arnulf
Ms.): “Repetition and Alignment in everyday Interaction.” Paper given at SFB “Aligment in Communication”, University of Bielefeld.
Deppermann, Arnulf and Henrike Helmer
2013 “Zur Grammatik des Verstehens im Gespräch: Inferenzen anzeigen und Handlungskonsequenzen ziehen mit also und dann.” Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 32 (1): 1–40.
Deppermann, Arnulf and Reinhold Schmitt
2007 “Koordination. Zur Begründung eines neuen Forschungsgegenstandes.” In Koordination. Analysen zur multimodalen Interaktion, ed. by Reinhold Schmitt, 15–54. Tübingen: Narr.
Deppermann, Arnulf and Reinhold Schmitt
2009 “Verstehensdokumentation: Zur Phänomenologie von Verstehen in der Interaktion.” Deutsche Sprache 36 (3): 220–245.
Drew, Paul
2003 “Comparative Analysis of Talk-in-Interaction in Different Institutional Settings.” In Studies in Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Philipp J. Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, and Jenny Mandelbaum, 293–308. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Du Bois, John W
2007 “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Eco, Umberto
1981The Role of the Reader. Bloomington and London: Indiana UP and Hutchinson.
Edwards, Derek
1997Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.
Edwards, Derek and Jonathan Potter
1992Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
Edwards, Derek and Jonathan Potter
2006 “Discursive Psychology, Mental States and Descriptions.” In Conversation and Cognition, ed. by Hedwig te Molder and Jonathan Potter, 241–259. Cambridge, MA: CUP.
Ehlich, Konrad
1983 “Text und sprachliches Handeln. Die Entstehung von Texten aus dem Bedürfnis nach Überlieferung.” In Schrift und Gedächtnis. Beiträge zur Archäologie der literarischen Kommunikation, ed. by Aleida Assmann, Jan Assmann, and Christof Hardmeier, 24–43. München: Fink.
Frank, Manfred
1989Das Sagbare und das Unsagbare. Studien zur neuesten französischen Hermeneutik und Texttheorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg
1960Wahrheit und Methode. Tübingen: Mohr.
Garfinkel, Harold
1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.
Goffman, Erving
1963Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: The Free Press.
Goffman, Erving
1970Strategic Interaction. Philadelphia, PA: U Pennsylvania P.
Golato, Andrea and Emma Betz
2008 “German ach and achso in Repair Uptake: Resources to Sustain or Remove Epistemic Asymmetry.” Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 27: 7–37.
Golato, Andrea
2010 “Marking Understanding versus Receipting Information in Talk: achso and ach in German Interaction.” Discourse Studies 12 (2): 147–176.
Goodwin, Charles
2013 “The Co-operative, Transformative Organization of Human Action and Knowledge.” Journal of Pragmatics 46 (1): 8–23.
Grice, H. Paul
1989Studies in the Ways of Words. London: Harvard UP.
Habermas, Jürgen
1985Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Helmer, Henrike
2011Die Herstellung von Kohärenz in der Interaktion durch Turnanschlüsse mit dann. Radolfzell: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung, URL: [URL].
Heritage, John
1984 “A Change-of-state Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by John M. Atkinson and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: CUP.
Heritage, John
2006 “Cognition in Discourse.” In Conversation and Cognition, ed. by Hedwig te Molder and Jonathan Potter, 184–202. Cambridge: CUP.
Heritage, John
2007 “Intersubjectivity and Progressivity in Person (and Place) Reference.” In Person Reference in Interaction, ed. by Nick Enfield and Tanya Stivers, 255–280. Cambridge: CUP.
Heritage, John and Watson, D.R
1979 “Formulations as conversational objects.” In Everyday language, ed. by George Psathas, 123–162. New York: Irvington.
Hinnenkamp, Volker
1998Missverständnisse in Gesprächen. Opladen: Westdeutscher.
Hobbs, Jerry R
2004 “Abduction in Natural Language.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Lawrence Horn and Gregory Ward, 724–741. Oxford: Blackwell.
2009 “Konstruktion oder Funktion? Erkenntnisprozessmarker (‘change-of state tokens‘) im Deutschen.” In Grammatik im Gespräch, ed. by Susanne Günthner and Jörg Bücker, 57–86. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Kindt, Walter
2002“Konzeptuelle Grundlagen einer Theorie der Verständigungsprobleme.“ In Verständigungsprobleme und gestörte Kommunikation, ed. by Reinhard Fiehler, 17–43. Radolfzell: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung, URL: [URL].
Kintsch, Walter
1998Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge: CUP.
Koch, Peter and Wulf Oesterreicher
1986 “Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte.” Romanistisches Jahrbuch 36: 15–43.
Koschman, Timothy
(ed.)2011 “Understanding Understanding in Action.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (2): 435–690.
Koshik, Irene
2002 “Designedly Incomplete Utterances: A Pedagogical Practice for Eliciting Knowledge Displays in Error Correction Sequences.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 35 (3): 277–309.
Lerner, Gene H
1991 “On the Syntax of Sentences in Progress.” Language in Society 20: 441–458.
Lerner, Gene H
2004 “The Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: Grammar as Action in Prompting a Speaker to Elaborate.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 37 (2): 151–184.
Linell, Per
2009Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Luhmann, Niklas
1984Soziale Systeme. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, Niklas
1995 “Wie ist Bewusstsein an Kommunikation beteiligt?” In his Soziologische Aufklärung, 37–54. Opladen: Westdeutscher.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice
1962Signes. Paris: Gallimard.
Meyrowitz, Joshua
1990 “Using Contextual Analysis to Bridge the Study of Mediated and Unmediated Behavior.” In Mediation, Information and Communication. Vol. 3: Information and Behavior, ed. by Brent D. Ruben and Leath A. Lievrouw, 67–94. New Brunswick: Transaction Press.
Mondada, Lorenza
2009 “Emergent focused interactions in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space.” Journal of Pragmatics 41, 1977–1997.
Mondada, Lorenza
2011 “Understanding as an Embodied, Situated and Sequential Achievement in Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 542–552.
Pickering, Martin J. and Simon Garrod
2004“Toward a Mechanistic Psychology of Dialogue.”Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2): 169–190.
Potter, Jonathan and Hedwig te Molder
2006 “Talking Cognition: Mapping and Making the Terrain.” In Conversation and Cognition, ed. by Hedwig te Molder and Jonathan Potter, 1–54. Cambridge, MA: CUP.
Sacks, Harvey
1992Lectures on Conversation. Volumes I & II, ed. by Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, Harvey and Emanuel A. Schegloff
1979 “Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons in Conversation and their Interaction.” In Everyday Language, ed. by George Psathas, 15–21. New York: Center for the Study of Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50: 696–735.
Schegloff, Emanuel A
1991 “Conversation Analysis and Socially Shared Cognition.” In Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, ed. by Lauren B. Resnick, John M. Levine, and Stephanie D. Teasley, 150–171. Washington, DC: APA.
Schegloff, Emanuel A
1992a “In another context.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 193–227. Cambridge: CUP.
Schegloff, Emanuel A
1992b “Repair after Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation.” American Journal of Sociology 97 (5): 1295–1345.
Schegloff, Emmanuel A
1996 “Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction.” Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emmanuel A. Schegloff and Sandra A. Thompson, 53–133. Cambridge: CUP.
Schegloff, Emanuel A
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: CUP.
Schegloff, Emmanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks
1977 “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53: 361–382.
Schiffer, Stephen
1972Meaning. Oxford: OUP.
Schleiermacher, Friedrich D.E
1977[1838]Hermeneutik und Kritik. Frankfurt am Main. Suhrkamp.
Schneider, Wolfgang Ludwig
2004Grundlagen der soziologischen Theorie. Band 3. Wiesbaden: VS.
Scholz, Oliver R
2001Verstehen und Rationalität. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
Schütz, Alfred
1974[1932]Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Schütz, Alfred and Thomas Luckmann
1979Strukturen der Lebenswelt Band 1. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Spranz-Fogasy, Thomas
1986widersprechen. Tübingen: Narr.
Stivers, Tanya
2005 “Modified Repeats: One Method for Asserting Primary Rights from Second Position.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38 (2): 131–158.
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig
(eds.)2011The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: CUP.
Svennevig, Jan
2004 “Other-Repetition as Display of Hearing, Understanding and Emotional Stance.” Discourse Studies 6 (4): 489–516.
te Molder, Hedwig and Jonathan Potter
(eds.)2006Conversation and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP.
Tomasello, Michael
2008Origins of Human Communication. London: MIT.
van Dijk, Teun A. and Walter Kintsch
1983Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic.
Weber, Max
2001[1922]Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft.Gesamtausgabe Band 22/1. Tübingen.
Cited by
Cited by 33 other publications
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. Two Projects. In Communicating & Relating, ► pp. 1 ff.
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. Conjointly Co-constituting Relating and Face in Everyday Interacting. In Communicating & Relating, ► pp. 314 ff.
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. Face Constituting Theory. In Communicating & Relating, ► pp. 275 ff.
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. What Is Individual in Communicating. In Communicating & Relating, ► pp. 113 ff.
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. Conjointly Co-constituting the Social and the Individual in Communicating. In Communicating & Relating, ► pp. 161 ff.
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. Communicating & Relating,
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. What Is Social in Communicating. In Communicating & Relating, ► pp. 16 ff.
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. An Algorithm for Autonomous Co-constituting in Conjoint Co-constituting. In Communicating & Relating, ► pp. 409 ff.
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. Researching Relating and Face in Everyday Interacting. In Communicating & Relating, ► pp. 361 ff.
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. Conjoint Co-constituting’s Implications. In Communicating & Relating, ► pp. 208 ff.
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. The Conjoint Co-constituting Model of Communicating. In Communicating & Relating, ► pp. 44 ff.
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. Conjointly Co-constituting Relating. In Communicating & Relating, ► pp. 246 ff.
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. An Alternate Representation of Conjoint Co-constituting. In Communicating & Relating, ► pp. 403 ff.
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. Conjoint Co-constituting, Constituting Face, and Future Research. In Communicating & Relating, ► pp. 392 ff.
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. Transcription Conventions. In Communicating & Relating, ► pp. 401 ff.
2021. How Shared Meanings and Uses Emerge Over an Interactional History:Wabi Sabiin a Series of Theater Rehearsals. Research on Language and Social Interaction 54:2 ► pp. 203 ff.
Edman, Kristina
2024. Doing mutual understanding in child and family therapy sessions: How three interlocutors calibrate new information. Discourse Studies
Helmer, Henrike
2020. How Do Speakers Define the Meaning of Expressions? The Case of Germanx heißt y(“x means y”). Discourse Processes 57:3 ► pp. 278 ff.
Hoeppe, Götz
2021. Encoding Collective Knowledge, Instructing Data Reusers: The Collaborative Fixation of a Digital Scientific Data Set. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 30:4 ► pp. 463 ff.
Küttner, Uwe-A.
2020.
Tying Sequences Together with the [
That’s
+
Wh
-Clause] Format: On (Retro-)Sequential Junctures in Conversation
. Research on Language and Social Interaction 53:2 ► pp. 247 ff.
2019. Conversation-analytic transcription of Arabic-German talk-in-interaction [Working Papers in Corpus Linguistics and Digital Technologies: Analyses and Methodology, 2],
[no author supplied]
2020. Introduction. In Communicating & Relating, ► pp. xvii ff.
[no author supplied]
2020. Series Editor Preface. In Communicating & Relating, ► pp. xi ff.
[no author supplied]
2020. Note on Sources. In Communicating & Relating, ► pp. 453 ff.
[no author supplied]
2020. Copyright Page. In Communicating & Relating, ► pp. iv ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.