A study of the development of the Chinese correlative comparative construction from the perspective of constructionalization

References

1. Anderson, Curt
   2013 Inherent and coerced gradability across categories: Manipulating pragmatic halos with sorta. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference23, 81–96. 10.3765/salt.v23i0.2667
   https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v23i0.2667 [Google Scholar]
2. Ansaldo, Umberto
   2010 Surpass comparatives in Sinitic and beyond: Typology and grammaticalization. Linguistics48(4). 919–950. 10.1515/ling.2010.029
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2010.029 [Google Scholar]
3. Barðdal, Jóhanna, Valgerður Bjarnadóttir, Serena Danesi, Tonya Kim Dewey, Thórhallur Eythórsson, Chiara Fedriani & Thomas Smitherman
   2013 The story of ‘Woe’. Journal of European Studies41(3). 321–377.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Beck, Sigrid
   1997 On the semantics of the comparative conditions. Linguistics and Philosophy. 20(3). 229–271. 10.1023/A:1005361901518
   https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005361901518 [Google Scholar]
5. Blumenthal-Dramé, Alice Julie
   2012 Entrenchment in usage-based theories: What corpus data do and do not reveal about the mind. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110294002
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110294002 [Google Scholar]
6. Boas, Hans C.
   2008 Determining the structure of lexical entries and grammatical constructions in Construction Grammar. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics6. 113–144. 10.1075/arcl.6.06boa
   https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.6.06boa [Google Scholar]
7. Booij, Geert
   2010 Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Börjars, Kersti, Nigel Vincent & George Walden
   2015 On constructing a theory of grammatical change. Transactions of the Philological Society113(3). 363–382. 10.1111/1467‑968X.12068
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12068 [Google Scholar]
9. Brown, G., & Yule, G.
   1983 Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805226
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805226 [Google Scholar]
10. Bybee, Joan
    2010 Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
11. Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins and William Pagliuca
    1994 The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cappelle, Bert
    2006 Particle placement and the case for ‘allostructions’. InDoris Schönefeld (ed.), Constructions all over: Case studies and theoretical implications, special issue of Constructions. Düsseldorf: Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet Duesseldorf.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Chao, Yuen Ren
    1968 A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Croft, William
    2000 Explaining language change. Harlow, Essex: Longman, Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Croft, William
    2001 Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
16. Culicover, Peter W. & Ray Jackendoff
    2005 Simpler syntax. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
17. De Smet, Hendrik
    2013 Spreading patterns: Diffusional change in the English system of complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. De Smet, Hendrik
    2014 Does innovation need reanalysis?InEvie Coussé & Ferdinand von Mengden (eds.), Usage-based approaches to language change, 23–48. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
19. De Smet, Hendrik
    2016 How gradual change progresses: The interaction between convention and innovation. Language Variation and Change28(1). 83–102. 10.1017/S0954394515000186
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394515000186 [Google Scholar]
20. De Smet, Hendrik, Frauke D’hoedt, Lauren Fonteyn & Kristel van Goethem
    2018 The changing functions of competing forms: Attraction and differentiation. Cognitive Linguistics29(2). 197–234. 10.1515/cog‑2016‑0025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0025 [Google Scholar]
21. Diewald, Gabriele
    2002 A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. InIlse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 103–120. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.49.09die
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.09die [Google Scholar]
22. Diewald, Gabriele
    2006 Context types in grammaticalization as constructions. ConstructionsSV1-9.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Diewald, Gabriele and Elena Smirnova
    2010 Evidentiality in German: Linguistic realization and regularities in grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110241037
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110241037 [Google Scholar]
24. Fried, Mirjam
    2008 Constructions and constructs: Mapping a shift between predication and attribution. InAlexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Constructions and language change, 47–79. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Goldberg, Adele E.
    1995 Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Goldberg, Adele E.
    2003 Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences7(5). 219–224. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(03)00080‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9 [Google Scholar]
27. Goldberg, Adele E.
    2006 Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Goldberg, Adele E.
    2013 Constructionist approaches. InHoffmann and Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 15–33. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Heine, Bernd, Heiko Narrog & Haiping Long
    2016 Constructional change vs. grammaticalization: From compounding to derivation. Studies in Language40(1). 137–175. 10.1075/sl.40.1.05hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.40.1.05hei [Google Scholar]
30. Hilpert, Martin
    2008 Germanic future constructions: A usage-based approach to language change. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.7 [Google Scholar]
31. Hilpert, Martin
    2012 Diachronic collostructional analysis. How to use it, and how to deal with confounding factors. InKathryn Allan & Justyna A. Robinson (eds.), Current methods in historical semantics, 133–160. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Hilpert, Martin
    2013 Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word-formation and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139004206
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004206 [Google Scholar]
33. Hilpert, Martin
    2018 Three open questions in diachronic construction grammar. InEvie Coussé, Joel Olofsson & Peter Andersson (eds.), Grammaticalization meets construction grammar, 22–39. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.21.c2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.21.c2 [Google Scholar]
34. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
    2004 Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal?InWalter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization – A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Hoffmann, Thomas
    2014 Comparing English comparative correlatives. Postdoctoral dissertation, Osnabrück University.
36. Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale
    (eds.) 2013 The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
37. Hüning, Matthias & Geert Booij
    2014 From compounding to derivation: The rise of derivational affixes through constructionalization. InFerdinand von Mengden & Horst Simon (eds.), Refining grammaticalization. Special issue of Folia Linguistica48(2). 579–604.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Israel, Michael
    1996 The way constructions grow. InAdele Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language, 217–230. Stanford: CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Li, Xiao & Carlos A. Fasola
    2010 The semantics of yue…yue in Mandarin Chinese. InLauren Eby Clemens & Chi-Ming Louis Liu (eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL 20), 36–53. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Lin, Jo-Wang
    2007 On the semantics of comparative correlatives in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Semantics24(2). 169–213. 10.1093/jos/ffm001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffm001 [Google Scholar]
41. Liu, Shizhen & Yunxia Ji
    2007 A tentative analysis of the origin of Middle Chinese grammar and its historical position. Macrolinguistics1. 141–156. 10.26478/ja2007.1.1.9
    https://doi.org/10.26478/ja2007.1.1.9 [Google Scholar]
42. Long, Guofu
    2013 [Yuelaiyue…] goushi de yufahua [The grammaticalization of the [yuelaiyue …] construction]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of Chinese Language] 1. 25–33.
43. Lü, Shuxiang
    1980 Xiandai Hanyu Babai Ci [The eight hundred words in Modern Chinese]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
44. Lü, Shuxiang
    1985 Jindai Hanyu zhidaici [Demonstratives and pronouns in Early Mandarin]. Shanghai: Xuelin Press.
45. McCawley, James D.
    1988 The comparative conditional construction in English, German and Chinese. Berkeley Linguistics Society14, 176–187. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Paradis, Carita
    2001 Adjectives and boundedness. Cognitive Linguistics12. 47–65. 10.1515/cogl.12.1.47
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.12.1.47 [Google Scholar]
47. Perek, Florent
    2015 Argument structure in usage-based construction grammar: Experimental and corpus-based perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.17
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.17 [Google Scholar]
48. Petré, Peter
    2014 Constructions and environments: Copular, passive, and related constructions in Old and Middle English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199373390.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199373390.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
49. Petré, Peter
    2019 The dynamic of assemblies and constructions. InBeatrix Busse & Ruth Möhlig-Falke (eds.), Patterns in language and linguistics: New Perspectives on a Ubiquitous Concept, 155–192. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Peyraube, Alain
    1996 Recent issues in Chinese historical syntax. InC.-T. J. Huang & Audrey Li Yen Hui (eds.), New horizons in Chinese linguistics, 161–213. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑1608‑1_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1608-1_6 [Google Scholar]
51. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, & Jan Svartvik
    1985 A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena
    1988 Variation and historical linguistics. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen89(2). 136–154.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Sag, Ivan A.
    2010 English filler-gap constructions. Language86(3). 486–45. 10.1353/lan.2010.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0002 [Google Scholar]
54. Saussure, Ferdinand de
    1983 [1916] Course in general linguistics. Translated byRoy Harris. Chicago: Open Court (first published in French in 1916).
    [Google Scholar]
55. Schmid, Hans-Jörg & Annette Mantlik
    2015 Entrenchment in historical corpora? Reconstructing dead authors’ minds from their usage profile. Anglia133(4). 583–623. 10.1515/ang‑2015‑0056
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ang-2015-0056 [Google Scholar]
56. Schuessler, Alex
    2015 New Old Chinese. Diachronica32(4). 571–598. 10.1075/dia.32.4.04sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.4.04sch [Google Scholar]
57. Smirnova, Elena
    2015 Constructionalization and constructional change: The role of context in the development of constructions. InBarðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer, & Spike Gildea (eds.) Diachronic construction grammar, 81–106. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.18.03smi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.03smi [Google Scholar]
58. Stassen, Leon
    1985 Comparison and universal grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Sun, Chaofen
    1996 Word-order change and grammaticalization in the history of Chinese. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Torrent, Tiago Timponi
    2015 On the relation between inheritance and change: The Constructional convergence and construction network reconfiguration hypotheses. InBarðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer, & Spike Gildea (eds.) Diachronic construction grammar, 173–211. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.18.06tor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.06tor [Google Scholar]
61. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    2014 Toward a constructional framework for research on language change. Cognitive Linguistic Studies1(1). 3–21. Slightly modified reprint inSylvie Hancil & Ekkehard König (eds.), Grammaticalization – Theory and data, 87–105. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale
    2013 Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
63. Van de Velde, Freek, Hendrik De Smet & Lobke Ghesquière
    2013 On multiple source constructions in language change. Studies in Language37(3). 473–488. 10.1075/sl.37.3.01int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.37.3.01int [Google Scholar]
64. Wang, Cui
    2016 “Hongtao yue lingluan” gai ruhe lijie? [How to interpret “hongtao yue linglun”?], Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of Chinese Language] 5. 615–616.
65. Wold, Dag
    1991 A few properties of the…the… comparative constructions, InMatt Alexander & Monica Dressler (eds), Second Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistic Society of Midamerica (FLSM2)272–281. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Zehentner, Eva
    2018 Ditransitives in Middle English: On semantic specialization and the rise of the dative alternation. English Language and Linguistics22(1). 149–175. 10.1017/S1360674316000447
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674316000447 [Google Scholar]
67. Zhan, Fangqiong
    2017 The constructionalization of a set of Chinese connectives. Journal of Chinese Linguistics46(1). 104–144.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
    2019 The development of the shì copula construction: A constructional perspective. Functions of Language26(2). 139–176. 10.1075/fol.16001.zha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16001.zha [Google Scholar]
69. Zhan, Weidong, Rui Guo & Yirong Chen
    2003 The CCL Corpus of Chinese Texts: 700 million Chinese Characters, the 11th Century B.C. – present, ccl.pku.edu.cn:8080/ccl_corpus
70. Zhang, Jiahe
    2010 Chengdu fuci yue, yuefa de yufahua ji xiangguan wenti [The grammaticalization of the degree adverbs yue and yuefa], Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Learning] 5. 69–75.
71. Zhu, Qizhi
    2010 Suizhe A he yuelaiyue A de tongxian yanjiu jiqi lishi kaocha [A diachronic study on the co-occurrence of suizhe A and yuelaiyue A], Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue [Global Chinese Teaching] 1. 66–72.