Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contribution of technic materials to the mobile fraction of metals in urban soils in Marrakech (Morocco)

  • Urban Soils (Subject Editor: Stefan Norra)
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background, Aim and Scope

In urban areas, soils are often dramatically altered by anthropogenic activity and these modifications distinguish these soils (Anthrosols, Technosols) from those in natural systems. In urban environments, they receive considerable pollution from industry, traffic and refuse. Since contaminated soil particles can be easily inhaled or ingested, there is a potential transfer of toxic pollutants to humans. Risk assessment is essentially based on the determination of the total or mobile contents of pollutants in soils using chemical extractions. This approach could be improved by taking into consideration the bioavailable fractions of these toxic elements as measured by biotests. The coarse soil fraction usually neglected in analyses can nevertheless have an effect on the concentration of metals in the soil solution. This coarse fraction is made up of the natural materials and of technic materials constituting anthropogenic soils (plastic, paper, fabric, wood, bones, metallic elements and building materials). These materials have variable capacities to release or adsorb trace elements. Samples representative of different technic fraction components of Marrakech urban soils permit one to quantify their contribution to the enrichment of the soluble metal concentrations. Works are carried out to achieve partial extractions of metals from the three fractions (less than 2 mm, coarse natural and coarse technic) of selected urban soils in order to determine their contribution to the metal contamination of soils.

Materials and Methods

Selected soils were collected from 9 sites according to a gradient of increasing anthropogenic influence from suburban to urban zones. Soils were air-dried, homogenized, and sieved (2 mm). The coarse fraction was sorted to separate the different technic materials and natural materials. Water extractions were run, on the natural, coarse fraction, on the complete technic fraction of the 9 soils and on average samples made of technic materials sorted out of 58 topsoils sampled from different sites in the city of Marrakech.

Results

Results show that the percentage of the technic fraction increases while approaching the historic city center. It represented about 14% in the most anthropogenically disturbed soils. Along this gradient, soils changed progressively from Anthrosols to Technosols according to the WRB classification of urban and industrial soils. Analyses of metal contents showed that the fine fraction (<2 mm) mainly contributed to the metallic contamination of the water soluble fraction. The natural coarse fraction had the highest contribution to the copper release and was responsible for the release of all water-extractable copper in some soils. Concerning the technic fraction, it has a significant contribution essentially in the most anthropogenically disturbed soils as characterized by an elevated percentage of anthropogenic elements. The water extractable metal contents of average samples of these anthropogenic elements shows that elevated metal concentrations were released by bones, wood, plastic and fabric/paper.

Discussion

This study concerns soils in urban areas, which are strongly impacted by human activities. Part of the soils can be classified as Anthrosols, profoundly impacted through the addition of organic materials from household wastes, irrigation, or cultivation. Other soils strongly impacted by human activities are Technosols dominated or strongly influenced by man-made materials. Technosols appear mostly in urban and industrial areas and are more likely to be contaminated than Anthrosols. The composition and heterogeneity of urban soils lead to modifications of the mobility and availability of pollutants depending on successive land-uses and on the composition of technic materials. The fine fraction offers a high transferring surface capacity, leading to a high mobilization of metals. The technic fraction contributes significantly to the metal release in the Technosols. This property can be explained by a reversible adsorption of metals on the organic matter.

Conclusions

Results confirm that anthropogenic activity causes a wide spatial diversity of soil quality in the urban and suburban area. It introduces large amounts of technic materials in soils that could have an impact on the metal availability. It therefore acts on the metal bioavailability in the urban Technosols.

Recommendations and Perspectives

These results show that it is necessary, in addition to the characterization of the fine particles, to take into account the contribution of the coarse fraction of the Technosols in the evaluation of risks of transfer of metals to the food chain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baize D (1997): Teneurs totales en éléments traces métalliques dans les sols (France). Références et stratégies d’interprétation. INRA Ed., France, Paris, 410 pp

  • Bitton G, Garland E, Kong IC, Morel JL, Koopman B (1996):A Direct solid phase assay for heavy metal toxicity. I. Methodology. Journal of Soil Contamination 5, 385–394

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boularbah A, Morel JL, Bitton G, Mench M (1996): A direct Solid-Phase assay specific for heavy metal toxicity. II. Assessment of heavy metal immobilization in soils and bioavailability to plants. Journal of Soil Contamination 5(4) 395–404

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boularbah A, Schwartz C, Bitton G, Morel JL (2006a): Heavy metal contamination from mining sites in South Morocco: 1. Use of a biotest to assess metal toxicity of tailings and soils. Chemosphere 63, 802–810

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boularbah A, Schwartz C, Bitton G, Aboudrar W, Ouhammou A, Morel JL (2006b): Heavy metal contamination from mining sites in South Morocco: 2. Assessment of metal accumulation and toxicity in plants. Chemosphere 63, 811–817

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock P, Gregory PJ (1991): Soils in the urban environment. Blackwell Scientific Publication, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Craul PJ (1999): Urban Soils Application and Practices. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • El Faïz M (2002): Marrakech Patrimoine en péril. Actes Sud / Eddit, France, 188 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), IUSS (International Union of Soil Sciences), ISRIC (International Soil Reference and Information Centre) (2006): World reference base for soil resources — A framework for international classification, correlation and communication. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabata-Pendias A, Pendias H (1992): Trace elements in soils and plants. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman A (2006): Technosol and other proposals on urban soils for the WRB (World Reference Base for Soil Resources), International Agrophysics 20, 129–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann A, Stahr K (2007): Nature and Significance of Anthropogenic Urban Soils. J Soils Sediments 7(4) 247–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Möller A, Müller HW, Abdullah A, Abdelgawad G, Utermann J (2005): Urban soil pollution in Damascus, Syria: Concentration and patterns of heavy metals in the soils of the Damascus Ghouta. Geoderma 124, 63–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morel JL, Schwartz C, Florentin L, de Kimpe C (2005): Urban soils. In: Hillel D (ed), Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment. Elsevier Ltd., Academic Press, London, 202–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Norra S, Lanka-Panditha M, Kramar U, Stüben D (2006): Mineralogical and geochemical patterns of urban surface soils, the example of Pforzheim, Germany. Applied Geochemistry 21, 2064–2081

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norra S, Stüben D (2003): Urban Soils. J Soils Sediments 3(4) 230–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter DG (2007): Classification of Urban and Industrial Soils in the World Reference Base for Soil Resources. J Soils Sediments 7(2) 96–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz C, Florentin L, Charpentier D, Muzika S, Morel JL (2001): Le pédologue en milieux industriels et urbains. I. Sols d’une friche industrielle. Etude et Gestion des Sols 8, 135–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz C, Florentin L, Elter R, Morel JL (2001): Urban soils: A complementary pedagogical and archaeological study. SUITMA 2000, 12–18 July, Essen, Germany

  • Townsend T, Tolaymat T, Leo K, Jambeck J (2004): Heavy metals in recovered fines from construction and demolition debris recycling facilities in Florida. The Science of the Total Environment 332, 1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilbaux Q (2001): La médina de Marrakech Formation des espaces urbains d’une ancienne capitale de Maroc. L’Harmattan, France, 383 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong CSC, Li X, Thornton I (2006): Urban environmental geochemistry of trace metals. Environmental Pollution 142, 1–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Schwartz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

El Khalil, H., Schwartz, C., Elhamiani, O. et al. Contribution of technic materials to the mobile fraction of metals in urban soils in Marrakech (Morocco). J Soils Sediments 8, 17–22 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1065/jss2008.01.269

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1065/jss2008.01.269

Keywords

Navigation