Abstract
The referendum on the United Kingdom’s continued membership of the European Union was the largest exercise in mass public democracy in political history. Yet, the result of that referendum has seen a sustained campaign by remain supporting elite groups and their allies, to undermine, delay and ultimately prevent withdrawal from the European Union. This article explores the reaction of elite groups and their allies to the referendum result for what it tells us about attitudes towards mass democracy, the thin veneer of tolerance of public dissent from perceived elite wisdom, and the way in which elite groups and their allies seek to undermine and delegitimise the result and nature of the majority of voters. The article also explores what the neo-reactionary elite response to the result tells us about relationships between elite groups in a liberal democratic state and whether popular mass democracy will transform into a post-democratic polity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Birch, A.H. 1993. The Concepts and Theories of Modern Democracy. London: Routledge.
Bottomore, T. 1993. Elites and Society. London: Routledge.
Canovan, M. 1999. Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Political Studies 47 (1): 2–16.
Chandler, J.A. 2007. Explaining Local Government: Local Government in Britain Since 1800. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Dryzek, J., and P. Dunleavy. 2009. Theories of the Democratic State. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Eulau, H., J. Whalke, W. Buchanan, and L. Ferguson. 1959. The Role of the Representative: Some Empirical Observations on the Theory of Edmund Burke. American Political Science Review 53 (3): 742–756.
Garrard, J. 2002. Democratisation in Britain: Elites, Civil Society and Reform Since 1800. Houndmills: Palgrave.
Held, D. 1993. Models of Democracy. Oxford: Polity Press.
Higley, J. 2010. Elite Theory and Elites. In Handbook of Politics. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research, ed. K.T. Leicht, and J.C. Jenkins. New York: Springer.
Jenkins, L. 2005. Disappearing Britain: The EU and the Death of Local Government. Washington: Orange State Press.
Judge, D. 1999. Representation: Theory and Practice in Britain. London: Routledge.
Keith-Lucas, B. 1952. The English Local Government Franchise. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Laffont, J.-J., and J. Tirole. 1991. The Politics of Government Decision-Making: A Theory of Regulatory Capture. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (4): 1089–1127.
Lasch, C. 1996. The Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Lasswell, H., and D. Lerner. 1952. The Comparative Study of Elites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lizzeri, A., and N. Persico. 2004. Why did the Elites Extend the Suffrage? Democracy and the Scope of Government, with an Application to Britain’s Age of Reform. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (2): 707–765.
Manin, B. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mills, C.Wright. 2000. The Power Elite. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morris-Jones, W.H. 1954. In Defence of Apathy: Some Doubts on the Duty to Vote. Political Studies 2 (1): 25–37.
Parry, G. 2005. Political Elites. Essex: ECPR Classics.
Pitkin, H. 1972. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Putnam, R. 1971. Studying Elite Political Culture: The Case of “Ideology”. American Political Science Review 65 (3): 651–681.
Putnam, R. 1976. The Comparative Study of Political Elites. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Qvortrup, M. 2005. A Comparative Study of Referendums: Government by the People. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Sartori, G. 1962. Democratic Theory. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
Schumpeter, J.A. 1974. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Unwin.
Stoker, G. 1998. Governance as Theory: Five Propositions. International Social Science Journal 50 (155): 17–28.
Taggart, P. 2002. Populism and the Pathology of Representative Politics. In Democracies and the Populist Challenge, ed. Y. Meny, and Y. Surel. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Thatcher, M., and A. Sweet. 2002. Theory and Practice of Delegation to Non-Majoritarian Institutions. West European Politics 25: 1–22.
Web references
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/24/david-cameron-resigns-after-uk-votes-to-leave-european-union (accessed October 28, 2017).
https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/european-union-referendum-nine-out-of-ten-university-staff-back-remain (accessed October 25, 2017).
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/23/eu-referendum-legally-binding-brexit-lisbon-cameron-sovereign-parliament (accessed October 30, 2017).
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-senior-conservative-mps-seize-on-a-forgotten-government-pledge-to-let-parliament-decide-the-a7366316.html (accessed November 27, 2017).
https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pm-commons-statement-on-eu-reform-and-referendum-22-february-2016 (accessed October 30, 2017).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Copus, C. The Brexit referendum: testing the support of elites and their allies for democracy; or, racists, bigots and xenophobes, oh my!. Br Polit 13, 90–104 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-018-0070-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-018-0070-3