Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Linking work-related and non-work-related supervisor–subordinate relationships to knowledge hiding: a psychological safety lens

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Asian Business & Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent research on knowledge hiding has focused on its interpersonal antecedents, such as co-worker relationships. However, few research has investigated the role of vertical relationships on reducing knowledge hiding behaviors. Extending this line of research, we examined the impacts of work-related (i.e., leader–member exchange, LMX) and non-work-related (i.e., supervisor–subordinate guanxi, SSG) supervisor–subordinate relationships on knowledge hiding. Drawing from social exchange and social cognitive theories, we proposed that both LMX and SSG negatively influence subordinates’ knowledge hiding through psychological safety. With a three-wave time-lagged design and data collected from 223 employees in China, our results show that (a) both LMX and SSG are negatively related to knowledge hiding; (b) psychological safety fully mediates the impact of LMX on knowledge hiding, whereas it partially mediates the impact of SSG on knowledge hiding. Theoretical and practical implications, research limitations, and promising avenues for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdullah, M. I., Huang, D., Ali, M., & Usman, M. (2019). Ethical Leadership and knowledge hiding: A moderated mediation model of relational social capital, and instrumental thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2403. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babič, K., Černe, M., Connelly, C. E., Dysvik, A., & Škerlavaj, M. (2019). Are we in this together? Knowledge hiding in teams, collective prosocial motivation and leader–member exchange. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(8), 1502–1522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, N. G., & Taylor, R. R. (1998). A developmental approach to the examination of friendship in leader–follower relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 9, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (pp. 349–444). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt, A. S. (2019). Determinants of top-down knowledge hiding in firms: An individual-level perspective. Asian Business and Management. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-019-00091-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butt, A. S., & Ahmad, A. B. (2019). Are there any antecedents of top-down knowledge hiding in firms? Evidence from the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(8), 1605–1627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Černe, M., Hernaus, T., Dysvik, A., & Škerlavaj, M. (2017). The role of multilevel synergistic interplay among team mastery climate, knowledge hiding, and job characteristics in stimulating innovative work behavior. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(2), 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Černe, M., Nerstad, C. G. L., Dysvik, A., & Škerlavaj, M. (2014). What goes around comes around: Knowledge hiding, perceived motivational climate, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 172–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Friedman, R., Yu, E. H., Fang, W. H., & Lu, X. P. (2009). Supervisor–subordinate guanxi: Developing a three-dimensional model and scale. Management and Organization Review, 5, 375–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, M. F. Y., & Wu, W. (2011). Participatory management and employee work outcomes: The moderating role of supervisor–subordinate guanxi. Asia–Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 49(3), 344–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, C. E., & Zweig, D. (2015). How perpetrators and targets construe knowledge hiding in organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(3), 479–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, C. E., Zweig, D., Webster, J., & Trougakos, J. P. (2012). Knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 64–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., Dasborough, M. T., & Weiss, H. M. (2017). Affective events and the development of leader–member exchange. Academy of Management Review, 42(2), 233–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dysvik, A., Buch, R., & Kuvaas, B. (2015). Knowledge donating and knowledge collecting: The moderating roles of social and economic LMX. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 36(1), 35–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C. (2002). Managing the risk of learning: Psychological safety in work teams. In M. West, D. Tjosvold, & K. Smith (Eds.), International handbook of organizational teamwork (pp. 1–38). London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C. (2004). Psychological safety, trust and learning in organizations: A group-level lens. In R. M. Kramer & K. S. Cook (Eds.), Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches (pp. 239–272). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farh, J. L., Tsui, A. S., Xin, K., & Cheng, B. S. (1998). The influence of relational demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. Organization Science, 9, 471–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froese, F. J., Sutherland, D., Lee, J. Y., Liu, Y., & Pan, Y. (2019). Challenges for foreign companies in China: Implications for research and practice. Asian Business and Management, 18(4), 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, T., & He, A. (2019). The influence mechanism between workplace ostracism and knowledge hiding: A moderated chain mediation model. Nankai Business Review, 22(3), 15–27. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, M., Tian, A. W., Soo, C., Zhang, B., Ho, K. S. B., & Hosszu, K. (2019). Different motivations for knowledge sharing and hiding: The role of motivating work design. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(7), 783–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, X., & Frenkel, S. J. (2019). Explaining supervisor–subordinate guanxi and subordinate performance through a conservation of resources lens. Human Relations, 72(11), 1752–1775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, P., Peng, Z., Zhao, H., & Estay, C. (2019). How and when compulsory citizenship behavior leads to employee silence? A moderated mediation model based on moral disengagement and supervisor–subordinate guanxi views. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(1), 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, P., Wang, X., Li, Z., Wu, M., & Estay, C. (2018). Compulsory citizenship behavior and employee silence: The roles of emotional exhaustion and organizational identification. Social Behavior and Personality, 46(12), 2025–2048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. The American Psychologist, 44, 513–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y., Zhu, L., Zhou, M., Li, J., Maguire, P., Sun, H., et al. (2018). Exploring the influence of ethical leadership on voice behavior: How leader–member exchange, psychological safety and psychological empowerment influence employees’ willingness to speak out. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1718. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huo, W., Cai, Z., Luo, J., Men, C., & Jia, R. (2016). Antecedents and intervention mechanisms: A multi-level study of R&D team’s knowledge hiding behavior. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(5), 880–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Z., Hu, X., Wang, Z., & Jiang, X. (2019). Knowledge hiding as a barrier to thriving: The mediating role of psychological safety and moderating role of organizational cynicism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(7), 800–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong, M., & Qian, X. (2015). Mr. right & superman: Effect of implicit followership on employee’s behaviors. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(9), 1162–1171. (in Chinese).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshman, C., & Rai, S. (2019). The influence of leadership on learning and innovation: Evidence from India. Asian Business and Management. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-019-00096-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, K. S., Wong, C. S., Wang, D. X., & Wang, L. H. (2000). Effect of supervisor–subordinate guanxi on supervisory decisions in China: An empirical investigation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(4), 751–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. S., & Zhong, W. G. (2020). Responses to alliance partners’ misbehavior and firm performance in China: The moderating roles of Guanxi orientation. Asian Business and Management, 19(3), 344–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C., & Tian, Y. (2017). The mechanism of how supervisor ostracism impacts on employee voice behavior. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 25(8), 175–183. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, N., & Yan, J. (2007). The mechanism of how trust climate impacts on individual performance. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39(6), 1111–1121. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, R., Tian, X., & Ling, W. (2015). Mechanisms of how managerial openness and supervisor–subordinate guanxi impact on employee pro-social rule breaking. Systems Engineering: Theory and Practice, 35(2), 342–357. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, J., Farh, C. I., & Farh, J. L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling, B., Duan, J., & Zhu, Y. (2010). Psychological safety in workplace: Conceptualization, antecedents and consequences. Advances in Psychological Science, 18(10), 1580–1589. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, J. (2016). Could achievements reward system promote creativity? Study under different achievement motivational climate. Systems Engineering: Theory and Practice, 36(4), 945–957. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Men, C., Fong, P. S. W., Huo, W., Zhong, J., Jia, R., & Luo, J. (2018). Ethical leadership and knowledge hiding: A moderated mediation model of psychological safety and mastery climate. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4027-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, H. (2013). Why and when do people hide knowledge? Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(3), 398–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Source of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(4), 717–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, X., Wu, W., Hao, S., Lu, X., Zhang, Y., & Liu, Y. (2017). On-work or off-work relationship? An engagement model of how and when leader–member exchange and leader–member guanxi promote voice behavior. Chinese Management Studies, 11(3), 441–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, H. H., Lin, T. C., Yoon, J., & Huang, C. C. (2014). Knowledge withholding intentions in teams: The roles of normative conformity, affective bonding, rational choice and social cognition. Decision Support Systems, 67, 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volmer, J., Spurk, D., & Niessen, C. (2012). Leader–member exchange (LMX), job autonomy, and creative work involvement. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 456–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P., Zhu, F., Song, H., & Bao, X. (2019). Interpersonal trust and knowledge hiding behavior: The joint moderating effects of the personal reputation concern and perceived uncertainty. Management Review, 31(1), 155–170. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader–member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 82–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J., Brown, G., Zweig, D., Connelly, C. E., Brodt, S., & Sitkin, S. (2008). Beyond knowledge sharing: Withholding knowledge at work. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 27(8), 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, L. Q., Liu, J., Chen, Y. Y., & Wu, L. Z. (2010). Political skill, supervisor–subordinate guanxi and career prospects in Chinese firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 437–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, M., & Cooke, F. L. (2019). Why and when knowledge hiding in the workplace is harmful: A review of the literature and directions for future research in the Chinese context. Asia–Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 57, 470–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, C., Chang, C., Scuotto, V., Shi, Y., & Paoloni, N. (2019). The social–psychological approach in understanding knowledge hiding within international R&D teams: An inductive analysis. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Lam, C. F., & Deng, Y. (2017). Leader–member exchange and guanxi are not the same: Differential impact of dyadic relationships on fit perceptions, helping behavior, and turnover intention. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(7), 1005–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, P., Liu, W., & Liao, J. (2011). The influencing mechanism of charismatic leadership on employee creativity: Is psychological safety enough? Management World, 10, 94–107. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X. A., Li, N., & Harris, T. B. (2015). Putting non-work ties to work: The case of guanxi in supervisor–subordinate relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., Liu, W., Li, J., & Yu, X. (2019). Leader–member exchange, organizational identification, and knowledge hiding: The moderating role of relative leader–member exchange. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(7), 834–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., Xia, Q., He, P., Sheard, G., & Wan, P. (2016). Workplace ostracism and knowledge hiding in service organizations. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 59, 84–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., & Xia, Q. (2019). Interpersonal distrust, negative affect and knowledge hiding behaviors. Science Research Management, 40(8), 284–292. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (71802087, 71772116, 71801097, 71974059).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Center of Business Management & Oriental Enterprise Management Research Center, Business School, Huaqiao University, No. 269 Chenghuabei Road, Quanzhou, 362021, Fujian, People’s Republic of China

    Peixu He, Rui Sun, Linlin Zheng & Chuangang Shen

  2. School of Management, Shanghai University, No. 99 Shangda Road, Shanghai, 200444, People’s Republic of China

    Hongdan Zhao

Authors
  1. Peixu He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rui Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hongdan Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Linlin Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chuangang Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongdan Zhao.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, P., Sun, R., Zhao, H. et al. Linking work-related and non-work-related supervisor–subordinate relationships to knowledge hiding: a psychological safety lens. Asian Bus Manage 21, 525–546 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-020-00137-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-020-00137-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation