Skip to main content
Log in

Gower out of time and place

  • Original Article
  • Published:
postmedieval Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surviving in more than 50 manuscript witnesses, John Gower’s Confessio amantis poses significant challenges for modern editors. Multiple languages and registers, several versions, and an intricately structured confessional dialogue are just some of the elements of the textual corpus of Gower’s poem that make it particularly striking that the most recent major new edition of the poem was completed at the end of the nineteenth century by G.C. Macaulay, with the early 2000’s edition by Russell Peck arguably being closer to a revision than a completely new effort. This article explores the ways in which the poem itself constructs queer temporalities, both within its frame narrative and in the confessional dialogue between Genius and Amans. These queer temporalities are further complicated by variations across manuscript witnesses, and this article examines a specific case in Oxford, Bodleian Library MS Ashmole 35 that cuts across and flattens the queer temporalities that are found in the majority of manuscript witnesses. The proposition is that the poem’s intricate structure and layout across manuscript witnesses can be opened up for detailed and advanced study once the text and its witnesses are, quite literally, taken out of time and place by a queer approach to editing. Such an approach would embrace the queer temporalities of the poem itself by liberating Gower’s text from the temporal and physical confines of printed editions and physical manuscripts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. All references to Gower’s poem, including translations from Latin, are to this edition.

References

Manuscript

  • Oxford, Bodleian Library MS Ashmole 35.

Other

  • Cerquiglini, B. 1999. In Praise of the Variant: A Critical History of Philology, trans. B. Wing. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Dinshaw, C. 2012. How Soon is Now? Medieval Texts, Amateur Readers, and the Queerness of Time. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Echard, S. 2003. Gower’s ‘bokes of Latin’: Language, Politics and Poetry. Studies in the Age of Chaucer 25: 123–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echard, S. 1998. With Carmen’s Help: Latin Authorities in the Confessio Amantis. Studies in Philology 95: 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, A. 2016. Cloud Atlas ‘astonishingly different’ in US and UK editions, study finds. The Guardian, 10 August. http://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/aug/10/cloud-atlas-astonishingly-different-in-us-and-uk-editions-study-finds.

  • Fredell, J. 2010. The Gower Manuscripts: Some Inconvenient Truths. Viator 41: 231–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, E. 2010. Time Binds: Queer Temporalities, Queer Histories. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gaylord, A.T. (1990) ‘After the Form of My Writynge’: Gower’s Bookish Prosody. Mediaevalia 16: 257–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halberstam, J. 2005. In a Queer Time and Place: Transgender Bodies, Subcultural Lives. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. 1993. Ownership and Readership: Studies in the Provenance of the Manuscripts of Gower’s Confessio Amantis. Ph.D. dissertation, York University, UK.

  • Macaulay, G.C., ed. [1900–1901] 1979. The English Works of John Gower. EETS e.s. 81, 82. Reprinted Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Nicholson, P. 1984. Gower’s Revisions in the Confessio Amantis. The Chaucer Review 19: 123–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, P. 2005. Love and Ethics in Gower’s Confessio Amantis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, K. 1992. John Gower and the Structures of Conversion: A Reading of the Confessio Amantis. Woodbridge, UK: D.S. Brewer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearsall, D. 2004. The Manuscripts and Illustrations of Gower’s Works. In A Companion to Gower, ed. S. Echard, 73-97. Woodbridge, UK: D.S. Brewer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, R., ed. and A. Galloway, trans. 2000–2013. John Gower, Confessio Amantis. TEAMS Middle English Texts Series. 3 vols. Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications.

  • Staley, L. 2000. Gower, Richard II, Henry of Derby, and the Business of Making Culture. Speculum 75: 68–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturges, R.S. 2000. Chaucer’s Pardoner and Gender Theory: Bodies of Discourse. London and New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, D. 2003. Amoral Gower: Language, Sex, and Politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeager, R.F. 1990. John Gower’s Poetic: The Search for a New Arion. Woodbrige, UK: D.S. Brewer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malte Urban.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Urban, M. Gower out of time and place. Postmedieval 9, 303–317 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41280-018-0095-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41280-018-0095-1

Navigation