Skip to main content
Log in

Expanding Economic Perspectives for Sustainability in Urban Water and Sanitation

  • Thematic Section
  • Published:
Development Aims and scope

Abstract

The economic principles and tools that are commonly applied to recover costs for urban water and sanitation arise from the dominant perspective of neo-classical economics, with its emphasis on ‘full cost pricing’ based on the ‘user pays’ principle. Kumudini Abeysuriya, Cynthia Mitchell and Juliet Willetts examine two other qualitatively different economic perspectives to demonstrate how they lead to different approaches: ecological economics takes a more holistic approach explicitly committed to sustainability, while Buddhist economics brings ethics to the fore and opens the possibility for cooperation between the various actors in creating solutions to benefit individuals, society and the environment. We propose a set of interconnected guiding principles based on an expanded economic perspective that integrates all three perspectives, to enable water and sanitation services for developing countries to align with sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ariyaratne, Ahangamage Tudor (1999) Schumacher Lectures on Buddhist Economics, Sarvodaya Vishva Lekha, Ratmalana, Sri Lanka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, Robert, John H. Cumberland, Herman E. Daly, Robert Goodland and Richard B. Norgaard (1997) An Introduction to Ecological Economics, Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, Gretchen C. and Paul R. Ehrlich (1996) ‘Socioeconomic Equity, Sustainability, and Earth's Carrying Capacity’, Ecological Applications 6(4): 991–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, Herman E. (1992) ‘Allocation, Distribution, and Scale: Towards an economics that is efficient, just, and sustainable’, Ecological Economics 6(3): 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, Herman E. and Joshua C. Farley (2003) Ecological Economics: Principles and applications, Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, Peter L. (2003) ‘Buddhist Economics and the Environment: Material flow analysis and the moderation of society's metabolism’, International Journal of Social Economics 30(1/2): 8–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards-Jones, Gareth, Ben Davies and Salman S. Hussain (2000) Ecological Economics: An introduction, Malden, MA: Blackwell Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, Archon and Erik Olin Wright (2003) ‘Thinking About Empowered Participatory Governance’, in Archon Fung and Erik Olin Wright (eds.) Deepening Democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, Peter H., Gary Wolff, Elizabeth L. Chalecki and Rachel Reyes (2002) ‘The Privatization of Water and Water Systems’, in Peter H. Gleick (ed.) The World's Water 2002–2003: The biennial report on freshwater resources, Oakland, CA: Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGranahan, Gordon, Pedro Jacobi, Jacob Songsore, Charles Surjadi and Marianne Kjellén (2001) The Citizens at Risk: From Urban sanitation to sustainable cities, London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, Desmond (1998) ‘Water as an economic good’, Natural Resources Forum 22(4): 253–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Cynthia, Simon Fane, Juliet Willetts, Roel Plant and Alex Kazaglis (2007) ‘Costing for Sustainable Outcomes in Urban Water Systems: A guidebook’, CRC for water quality and treatment research report no. 35, ISBN 1876616601.

  • Payutto, Phra Thepwethi (1992) ‘Buddhist Economics: A middle way for the market place’, Available online.

  • Rahula, Walpola (1996) What the Buddha Taught, Dehiwala, Sri Lanka: Buddhist Cultural Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, Ernst Friedrich (1973) Small is Beautiful: Economics as if people mattered, New York: Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Nelson D. (2005) ‘Prosperity Without Peace: Israel rises’, Fortune 151(10): 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Joseph Wayne, Graham Lyons and Gary Sauer-Thompson (1999) The Bankruptcy of Economics: Ecology, economics and the sustainability of the Earth, London and Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, Peter (2000) Ecological Economics: A political economics approach to environment and development, London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, Peter (2003) ‘Ecological Economics for Water Policy and Management: A need for major shifts in thinking’, Water Science & Technology 47(6): 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockholm Water Symposium Statement (2002) ‘Urgent Action Needed for Water Security: 2002 STOCKHOLM STATEMENT’, Available online.

  • United Nations (1997) Glossary of Environment Statistics. Studies in methods: Series F, No. 67, New York: United Nations.

  • Walker, Ian (2003) ‘PRC Wastewater Tariffs and Management Study’, Available online.

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Presents ecological and Buddhist economic and sustainability approaches to water resources

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abeysuriya, K., Mitchell, C. & Willetts, J. Expanding Economic Perspectives for Sustainability in Urban Water and Sanitation. Development 51, 23–29 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1100442

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1100442

Keywords

Navigation