Skip to main content
Log in

Bail-in and asset encumbrance - Implications for banks’ asset liability management

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Banking Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In response to the financial crisis the European Union proposes bail-ins as a new regulatory instrument. For banks this mechanism affects the funding costs that now depend on the amount of assets under encumbrance. The bank’s optimal level of asset encumbrance, however, is not necessarily optimal for its senior unsecured investors. In a new simulation framework, we access the effects of the bail-in regulation and the effect on the costs of banks and investors. Analyzing major EU banks’ funding structure we find funding cost should be up to 49 basis points higher to reflect the increased risk for senior unsecured investors. On the other hand all banks of our sample could lower their overall cost level by up to 17 basis points by increasing the level of asset encumbrance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Notes

  • Demirgüc-Kunt, A. and Huizinga, H. (2010) Bank activity and funding strategies: The impact on risk and returns. Journal of Financial Economics 98(3): 626–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmel, R.S. (2014) A law professors perspective on too big to fail. Journal of Banking Regulation 15(3-4): 227–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houben, A. et al (2013) Asset Encumbrance, Financial Reform And The Demand For Collateral Assets. Bank for International Settlement, Committee on the Global Financial System. Technical Report no. 49, http://www.bis.org/publ/cgfs49.htm.

  • EU Council (2013) Council Agrees Position On Bank Resolution. Brussels: Economic and Financial Affairs Council. Technical Report 11228/13.

  • Calomiris, C.W. (1999) Building an incentive-compatible safety net. Journal of Banking & Finance 23(10): 1499–1519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ECB (2014) Aggregate Report on the Comprehensive Assessment. Frankfurt am Main: European Central Bank. Technical report.

  • Enthofer, H. (2013) Treasurer’s Handbook – Financial Markets: A Practitioner’s Guide, 2nd edn. Vienna: Linde Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody’s (2012) Special Comment: Moody’s European Covered Bonds Monitoring Overview: Q2 2012. London: Moody’s Investor Service. Technical report.

  • Ayadi, R. and Lastra, R.M. (2010) Proposals for reforming deposit guarantee schemes in Europe. Journal of Banking Regulation 11(3): 210–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleftouri, N. (2013) Deposit protection systems design and effectiveness. Journal of Banking Regulation 16(1): 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, J., Predescu, M. and White, A. (2004) The relationship between credit default swap spreads, bond yields, and credit rating announcements. Journal of Banking & Finance 28(11): 2789–2811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, J. and Collin-Dufresne, P. (2011) The determinants of the CDS-Bond Basis during the Financial Crisis of 2007–2009. Working Paper. Available at: http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=127965.

  • Kenyon, C. and Stamm, R. (2012) Discounting, LIBOR, CVA and Funding. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhry, M. (2012) The Principles of Banking, 1st edn. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pallavicini, A., Perini, D. and Brigo, D. (2011) Funding Valuation Adjustment: A consistent framework including CVA, DVA, collateral, netting rules and re-hypothecation. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1969114.

  • Grossmann, R. (2011) CDS Spreads and Default Risk – A Leading Indicator? New York: Fitch Ratings. Technical Report.

  • Glionna, J., Hernandez, M. and Monteleone, B. (2012) The implications of 0% recovery. New York: Credit Research Barclays Capital. Technical Report.

  • Financial Stability Board (2014) Adequacy of loss-absorbing capacity of global systemically important banks in resolution. Consultative Document.

  • We would like to thank an anonymous referee for pointing this out to us.

  • Cœuré, B. (2013) The Implications of Bail-in Rules for Bank Activity and Stability. Opening Speech at the Conference on Financing the Recovery after the Crisis–The Roles Of Bank Profitability, Stability and Regulation. Bocconi University, Milan. MI, Vol. 30.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank an anonymous referee for helpful comments, Rainer Grupp for research assistance and the participants of the LBBW Workshop, Frankfurt 2014 for helpful remarks. All remaining errors are our own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erhardt, J., Lübbers, J. & Posch, P. Bail-in and asset encumbrance - Implications for banks’ asset liability management. J Bank Regul 18, 149–162 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/jbr.2016.4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jbr.2016.4

Keywords

Navigation