Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Density dependence in corporative systems: Development of the population of Danish patient groups (1901–2011)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Interest Groups & Advocacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Executive Summary

This article tests the density dependence theory on the population of Danish patient groups from 1901 to 2011. The theory states that the formation of interest groups can be explained by the number of groups in the population. The density dependence theory is a population theory, and these have successfully been applied to interest group populations in pluralist systems such as the American. However, they have only rarely been applied to corporative systems. As there are important differences between pluralist and corporative systems regarding how interest groups are integrated in the policy process, the interest group populations can be expected to develop in different ways. Therefore, the article explores whether and how population theories work in corporative systems by testing the density dependence theory on the population of Danish patient groups. The article conducts a graphical and a statistical analysis on a new and comprehensive data set with founding and disbanding years for all Danish patient groups from 1901 to 2011. The findings support the expectations of the theory as the density of the population has a positive and curvilinear effect on the founding rate. However, they also indicate that corporative structures may suppress the population mechanisms that are often found to drive the development of interest group populations in pluralist systems. This suggests that population theories can also be applied to corporative systems and that they can contribute to answer the much discussed question about interest group formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Data for expenditures to health are from Statbank Denmark (2012).

  2. Data for parliamentary activity and salience are borrowed from the research project Political Agenda-setting (2012).

  3. An analysis of whether density also has an effect on the population’s death rate as the one Nownes and Lipinski (2005) conducted would have been very interesting. Unfortunately, this was not possible because of the low number of patient groups that actually died.

References

  • Aldrich, H.E. (1999) Organizations Evolving. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H.E., Zimmer, C.R., Staber, U.H. and Beggs, J.J. (1994) Minimalism, mutualism, and maturity: The evolution of the American trade association population in the 20th century. In: J.A.C. Baum and J.V. Singh (eds.) Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balslev, J. (1997) Patientforeningsbogen. Copenhagen, Denmark: Balslev Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balslev, J. (1999) Patientforeningsbogen. Frederiksberg, Denmark: PatientForum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balslev, J. (2000) Patientforeningsbogen. Copenhagen, Denmark: Nyt Nordisk Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S.H. (1956) Pressure groups and parties in Britain. The American Political Science Review 50 (1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J.M. (1999) The new liberalism: The Rising Power of Citizen Groups. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binderkrantz, A. (2005) Magtens Midler. Danske interesseorganisationer og deres indflydelsesstrategier. Aarhus, Denmark: Politica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buksti, J.A. and Johansen, L.N. (1977) Danske organisationers hvem-hvad-hvor. Copenhagen, Denmark: Politikens Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burau, V. and Blank, R. (2006) Comparing health policy: An assessment of typologies of health systems. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 8 (1): 63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G.R. and Hannan, M.T. (2000) The Demography of Corporations and Industries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cawson, A. (1988) In defence of the new testament: A reply to Andrew Cox, ‘The old and new testaments of corporatism’. Political Studies 36 (2): 309–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cawson, A. (1986) Corporatism and Political Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, P.M. (2012) The usual suspects: Interest group dynamics and representation in Denmark. In: D. Halpin and G. Jordan (eds.) The Scale of Interest Organization in Democratic Politics. Data and Research Methods. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 161–179.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, P.M. and Nørgaard, A.S. (2003) Faste forhold – flygtige forbindelser. Stat og interesseorganisationer i Danmark i det 20. århundrede. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, P.M., Nørgaard, A., Rommetvedt, H., Svensson, T., Thesen, G. and Öberg, P. (2010) Varieties of democracy. VOLUNTAS – International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 21 (1): 22–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danske Handicaporganisationer. (2012) DH i råd, nævn og udvalg – nationalt, http://www.handicap.dk/om-dh/rad-og-nevn/representation-nationalt, accessed 24 March 2013.

  • Danske Regioner. (2012) Danske Regioner – Health care, http://www.regioner.dk/In+English/Regional+Denmark/Regional+Tasks/Health+Care.aspx, accessed 24 March 2013.

  • Folketinget. (2012) Folketinget. http://www.ft.dk, accessed 24 March 2013.

  • Forebyggelsesrådet and Komiteen for Sundhedsoplysning. (1989) Vejviser over sygdoms- og sundhedsforeninger. Copenhagen, Denmark: Forebyggelsesrådet.

  • Gray, V. and Lowery, D. (1996) A niche theory of interest representation. The Journal of Politics 58 (1): 91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, V. and Lowery, D. (1998) To lobby alone or in a flock. American Politics Research 26 (1): 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, V. and Lowery, D. (2001) The expression of density dependence in state communities of organized interests. American Politics Research 29 (4): 374–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, V. and Lowery, D. (2004) A neopluralist perspective on research on organized interests. Political Research Quarterly 57 (1): 163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, V., Lowery, D. and Godwin, E.K. (2007) Public preferences and organized interests in health policy: State pharmacy assistance programs as innovations. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 32 (1): 89–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T. (2005) Ecologies of organizations: Diversity and identity. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (1): 51–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T. and Carroll, G.R. (1995) Density-dependent evolution. In: M.T. Hannan and G.R. Carroll (eds.) Organizations in Industry: Strategy, Structure, and Selection. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T. and Freeman, J. (1987) The ecology of organizational founding: American labor unions, 1836–1985. American Journal of Sociology 92 (4): 910–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T. and Freeman, J. (1988a) Density dependence in the growth of organizational populations. In: G.R. Carroll (ed.) Ecological Models of Organizations. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T. and Freeman, J. (1988b) The ecology of organizational mortality: American labor unions, 1836–1985. American Journal of Sociology 94 (1): 25–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indenrigs- og Sundhedsministeriet. (1987) Lov om sundhedsvæsenets centralstyrelse m.v., https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=46936#K3, accessed 24 March 2013.

  • Interarena. (2012) Interarena.http://www.interarena.dk/, accessed 24 March 2013.

  • Johansen, L.N. and Kristensen, O.P. (1982) Corporatist traits in Denmark, 1946–1976. In: G. Lehmbruch and P. Schmitter (eds.) Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E.W. (2008) Social movement size, organizational diversity and the making of federal law. Social Forces 86 (3): 967–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, G. and Halpin, D. (2009) Interpreting environments: Interest group response to population ecology pressures. British Journal of Political Science 39 (2): 243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmbruch, G. (1982) Introduction: Neo-corporatism in comparative perspective. In: G. Lehmbruch and P. Schmitter (eds.) Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making. London: Sage, pp. 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J.S. and Freese, J. (2006) Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, D. (2012) Interest organization populations: The demands of the scale of analysis and the theoretical purposes of counting. In: D. Halpin and G. Jordan (eds.) The Scale of Interest Organization in Democratic Politics: Data and Research Methods. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, D. and Gray, V. (1995) The population ecology of Gucci Gulch, or the natural regulation of interest group numbers in the American States. American Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, D., Gray, V. and Fellowes, M. (2005) Sisyphus meets the Borg. Journal of Theoretical Politics 17 (1): 41–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messer, A., Berkhout, J. and Lowery, D. (2011) The density of the EU interest system: A test of the ESA model. British Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molina, O. and Rhodes, M. (2002) Corporatism: The past, present, and future of a concept. Annual Review of Political Science 5 (1): 305–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickel, M.N. and Fuentes, J.M. (2004) Relationship between legitimation, competition and organizational death: Current state of the art. International Journal of Management Reviews 5 (1): 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nownes, A.J. (2004) The population ecology of interest group formation: Mobilizing for gay and lesbian rights in the United States, 1950–1998. British Journal of Political Science 34 (1): 49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nownes, A.J. (2010) Density dependent dynamics in the population of transgender interest groups in the United States, 1964–2005. Social Science Quarterly 91 (3): 689–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nownes, A.J. and Lipinski, D. (2005) The population ecology of interest group death: Gay and lesbian rights interest groups in the United States, 1945–1998. British Journal of Political Science 35 (2): 303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öberg, P.O., Svensson, T., Christiansen, P.M., Nørgaard, A.S., Rommetvedt, H. and Thesen, G. (2011) Disrupted exchange and declining corporatism: Government authority and interest group capability in Scandinavia. Government and Opposition 46 (3): 365–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011) Total Expenditure on Health, Health: Key Tables from OECD. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/total-expenditure-on-health-2011_hlthxp-total-table-2011-1-en, accessed 24 March 2013.

  • Olson, M. (1982) The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallesen, T. (1999) Sundhedspolitik: Hvad udad tabes må indad vindes. In: J. Blom-Hansen and C. Daugbjerg (eds.) Magtens Organisering. Stat og interesseorganisationer i Danmark. Aarhus, Denmark: Systime.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patientombuddet. (2012) Patientombuddet.http://www.patientombuddet.dk/, accessed 24 March 2013.

  • Patientvejledningen. (2012) Patientvejledningen. http://www.patientvejledningen.dk/, accessed 24 March 2013.

  • Pierson, P. (1996) The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics 48 (2): 143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Political Agenda-setting. (2012) Political Agenda-Setting.http://www.agendasetting.dk/, accessed 24 March 2013.

  • Salisbury, R.H. (1969) An exchange theory of interest groups. Midwest Journal of Political Science 13 (1): 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E.E. (1960) The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P.C. (1974) Still the century of corporatism? The Review of Politics 36 (1): 85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statbank Denmark. (2012) OFF23: Klassifikation af offentlige udgifter, funktionel fordeling efter funktion, http://www.statistikbanken.dk/, accessed 24 March 2013.

  • Truman, D.B. (1951) The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrangbæk, K., Rommetvedt, H. and Opedal, S. (2010) Patientorganisationer i Danmark og Norge. Karakteristika og strategier for interessevaretagelse. Politica 42 (1): 90–108, 133.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Darren Halpin, Anne Binderkrantz, Peter Munk Christiansen, Therese Arent Overgaard and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. I also thank Christoffer Green-Pedersen for letting me use data from the research project Political Agenda-setting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science and Government, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 7, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark

    Helene Marie Fisker

Authors
  1. Helene Marie Fisker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fisker, H. Density dependence in corporative systems: Development of the population of Danish patient groups (1901–2011). Int Groups Adv 2, 119–138 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2013.4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2013.4

Keywords

Search

Navigation