Skip to main content
Log in

Does one size fit all? A dual double diamond approach to country-specific advantages

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Asian Business & Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this era of globalization, an accurate analysis of country-specific advantages (CSAs) is imperative for multinational corporations (MNCs) to thrive in global competition. Integrating previous extensions of Porter's diamond model, this paper introduces the ‘dual double diamond’ (DDD) model as a new approach to analyze CSAs of countries with various characteristics, and empirically tests the explanatory power of each model. The results show that the generalized double diamond (GDD) and nine-factor (NF) models have better explanatory power than Porter's diamond when assessing CSAs of countries with high international connectivity and high human-factor dependency, respectively, and that the DDD model is more comprehensive than the GDD and NF models in explaining CSAs of countries with heterogeneous attributes. This paper also discusses the implications of the DDD model for MNCs investing, or planning to invest, in Asian countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. High correlation coefficients between land area and major natural resources show that land area can be employed as a proxy variable for factor endowments (natural resources): aluminum production: r=0.81; natural gas production: r=0.74; round wood production: r=0.72; oil production: r=0.53; coal production: r=0.51; pig iron and crude steel production: r=0.48; cement production: r=0.37 (all the correlations are significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed)).

  2. As the probability of committing at least one Type I error in the set of K independent comparisons is calculated as P=1−(1−α)K (Glass and Hopkins, 1996), in order to employ a significance level of 0.05 for the complete set of multiple comparisons, we adopt a significance level of 0.01 for each comparison.

References

  • Cartwright, W.R. (1993) Multiple linked diamonds: New Zealand's experience. Management International Review 33 (2): 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, D.S. (1994) A dynamic approach to international competitiveness: The case of Korea. Journal of Far Eastern Business 1 (1): 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, D.S. and Moon, H.C. (2000) From Adam Smith to Michael Porter. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, D.S., Moon, H.C. and Kim, M.Y. (2006) Competitive Strategy to Enhance National Competitiveness, Proceedings of the Academy of International Business 2006 Annual Meeting; 23–26 June 2006, Beijing, China.

  • Cho, D.S., Moon, H.C. and Kim, M.Y. (2007) Beyond Porter's Single Diamond: A Dual Double Diamond Model Approach to National Competitiveness, Proceedings of the Academy of International Business 2007 Annual Meeting; 25–28 June 2007, Indianapolis.

  • Cho, D.S., Moon, H.C. and Kim, M.Y. (2008) Characterizing international competitiveness in international business research: A MASI approach to national competitiveness. Research in International Business and Finance 22 (2): 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. (1993) Internationalizing Porter's diamond. Management International Review 33 (2): 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. (2003) The role of foreign direct investment in upgrading China's competitiveness. Journal of International Business and Economy 4 (1): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, M.J. and Wang, Z. (2007) Nanjing's performance as China's FDI inflows grow. International Journal of Management and Decision Making 8 (2): 426–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G.V. and Hopkins, K.D. (1996) Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology, 3rd edn., Allyn and Bacon, MA: Needham Heights.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgetts, R.M. (1993) Porter's diamond framework in a Mexican context. Management International Review 33 (2): 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPS. (2006) IPS National Competitiveness Research 2006 Report. Seoul: IPS and IPS-NaC.

  • Kim, M.Y. (2006) Inequality in globalization: An extension of the Gini index from the perspective of national competitiveness. Journal of International Business and Economy 7 (1): 119–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makino, S., Isobe, T. and Chan, C.M. (2004) Does country matter? Strategic Management Journal 25 (10): 1027–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, H.C., Rugman, A.M. and Verbeke, A. (1995) The Generalized Double Diamond Approach to International Competitiveness. In: A.M. Rugman, V.D. Broeck and A. Verbeke (eds.) Research in Global Strategic Management: Beyond the Diamond. Greenwich, CN: JAI Press, pp. 97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, H.C., Rugman, A.M. and Verbeke, A. (1998) A generalized double diamond approach to the global competitiveness of Korea and Singapore. International Business Review 7: 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1998) Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review 76 (6): 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (2000) Attitudes, Values, Beliefs and the Microeconomics of Prosperity. In: L.E. Harrison and S.P. Huntington (eds.) Culture Matters. New York: Perseus Books Group, pp. 14–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (2003a) Malaysia's Competitiveness: Moving to the Next Stage, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (Presentation slides).

  • Porter, M.E. (2003b) Building the Microeconomic Foundations of Prosperity: Findings from the Business Competitiveness Index. In: World Economic Forum (ed.) The Global Competitiveness Report. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 29–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E., Takeuchi, H. and Sakakibara, M. (2000) Can Japan Compete? Cambridge, MA: Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R.B. (1990) Who is us? Harvard Business Review 68 (1): 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A.M. (1991) Diamond in the rough. Business Quarterly 55 (3): 61–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A.M. (1992) Porter takes the wrong turn. Business Quarterly 57 (36): 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A.M. and D’Cruz, J.R. (1993) The double diamond model of international competitiveness: The Canadian experience. Management International Review 33: 17–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A.M. and Verbeke, A. (1992) A note on the transnational solution and the transaction cost theory of multinational strategic management. Journal of International Business Studies 23 (4): 761–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. (1990) A grand disunity. National Review 9: 46–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan, W. and Hamilton, W. (1991) Country-specific advantage and international cooperation. Strategic Management Journal 12 (6): 419–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thain, D.H. (1990) The war without bullets. Business Quarterly, 55 (1) 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

An early version of this paper was presented at the Academy of International Business 2007 annual meeting in Indianapolis, IN. We thank anonymous AIB and ABM reviewers for their valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min-Young Kim.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables A1 and A2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cho, DS., Moon, HC. & Kim, MY. Does one size fit all? A dual double diamond approach to country-specific advantages. Asian Bus Manage 8, 83–102 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/abm.2008.27

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/abm.2008.27

Keywords

Navigation