Abstract
Robert D. Putnam’s Making Democracy Work has propelled the issue of social capital to the front stage of the social sciences. It argues that the difference in the efficiency of regional governments in Italy— the northern ones being much more efficient than those in the south—results from the differentiated presence of social capital in both parts of the country. Social capital, defined as the “features of social organization, such as trust, norms, and networks, that can improve the efficiency of society by facilitating co-ordinated actions” (Putnam 1993, 167), is, according to Putnam, much more present in northern than in southern Italy. As a consequence, northern Italy is characterized by its cooperative and civic culture sustained by a strongly rooted associative life, contrasting with the southern culture of “amoral familism,” based on the exclusive defense of the interests of the nuclear family. The civic communities of the North are “bound together by horizontal relations of reciprocity and co-operation, not by vertical relations of authority and dependence,” characteristic of the South. In a civic community, citizens develop attitudes that enhance cooperation. They are “helpful, respectful, and trustful toward one another” (Putnam 1993, 88), and they can hence count on reciprocal trust, even in the case of self-interested transactions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alcaro, M. (1999). Sull’Identità Meridionale. Forme di una Cultura Mediterranea. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
Bagnasco, A. (1994). “Regioni, Tradizione Civica, Modernizzazione Italiana: Un Commento alla Ricerca di Putnam.” Stato e Mercato 40, 93–103. di Comunità. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Banfield, E. C. (1967 [195 Bagnasco, A. (1999). Tracce 8]). The Moral Basis of a Backward Society. New York: Free Press.
Bettin Lattes, G. (1993). “Le Radici della Cultura Civica nell’Italia Divisa.” Quaderni di Sociologia 37(5), 161–171.
Cento Bull, A. (1996). “Ethnicity, Racism and the Northern League.” pp. 171–187. In C. Levy (ed.), Italian Regionalism. History, Identity and Politics. Oxford: Berg.
Colombis, A. (1992). “‘L’invenzione’ del Familismo Amorale.” pp. 201–212. In F. P. Cerase (ed.), Dopo il Familismo Cosa? Milano: Franco Angeli.
Colombis, A. (1997). “Invece del Familismo: La Famiglianza.” pp. 382–408. In B. Meloni (ed.), Famiglia Meridionale Senza Familismo. Catanzaro: Meridiana Libri.
Davis, J. (1970). “Morals and Backwardness.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 12(3), 340–353.
Davis, J. (1998). “Casting of the ‘Southern Problem’: Or the Peculiarities in the South Reconsidered.” pp. 205–224. In J. Schneider (ed.), Italy’s “Southern Question.” Orientalism in One Country. Oxford: Berg.
Donzelli, C. (1990). “Mezzogiorno tra ‘Questione’ e Purgatorio. Opinione Comune, Immagine Scientifica, Strategie di Ricerca.” Meridiana 9, 13–53.
Feltrin, P. (1994). “Recensione di Robert D. Putnam, La tradizione civica nelle regioni italiane>.” Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 24(1), 169–172.
Ginsborg, P. (1990). A History of Contemporary Italy. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Gribaudi, G. (1990). A Eboli. Il Mondo Meridionale in Cent’anni di Trasformazione. Venezia: Marsilio.
Gribaudi, G. (1993). “Familismo e Famiglia a Napoli en nel Mezzogiorno.” Meridiana 17, 13–42.
Gribaudi, G. (1996). “Images of the South.” pp. 72–87. In D. Forgacs and and R. Lumley, Italian Cultural Studies. An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huysseune, M. (1999). “Putnam Interpreteren Vanuit een Italiaanse Context.” Tijdschrift voor Sociologie 20(3–4), 283–301.
Lupo, S. (1993). “Usi e Abusi del Passato. Le Radici dell’Italia di Putnam.” Meridiana 18, 151–168.
Magatti, M. (1998). Tra Disordine e Scisma. Le Basi Sociali della Protesta del Nord. Roma: Carocci.
Marselli, G. A. (1963). “American Sociologists and Italian Peasant Society: With Reference to the Book of Banfield.” Sociologia Ruralis 3(4), 319–338.
Meloni, B. (1997). “Introduzione.” pp. v–lxiii. In B. Meloni (ed.), Famiglia Meridionale senza Familismo. Catanzaro: Meridiana Libri.
Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work. Civic Tradition in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ramella, F. (1995). “Mobilitazione Pubblica e Società Civile Meridionale.” Meridiana 22–23, 121–154.
Romanelli, R. (1995). “Centralismo e Autonomie.” pp. 125–186. In R. Romanelli (ed.), Storia dello Stato Italiano dall’Unità a Oggi. Roma: Donzelli.
Sabetti, F. (1996). “Path Dependency and Civic Culture: Some Lessons from Italy about Interpreting Social Experiments.” Politics and Society 24(1), 19–44.
Sciolla, L. (1999). “Come si Puo Costruire un Cittadino.” Il Mulino 48(4), 601–609.
Tarrow, S. (1977). Between Center and Periphery. Grassroots Politicians in Italy and France. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Tarrow, S. (1996). “Making Social Science Work Across Space and Time: A Critical Reflection on Robert Putnam’s Making Democracy Work.” American Political Science Review 90(2), 389–397.
Trigilia, C. (1988). “Le Condizioni ‘Non Economiche’ dello Sviluppo: Problemi di Ricerca sul Mezzogiorno d’Oggi.” Meridiana 2, 167–187.
Woolcock, M. (1998). “Social Capital and Economic Development: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis and a Policy Framework.” Theory and Society 27(2), 151–208.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2003 Marc Hooghe and Dietlind Stolle
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Huysseune, M. (2003). Institutions and Their Impact on Social Capital and Civic Culture: The Case of Italy. In: Hooghe, M., Stolle, D. (eds) Generating Social Capital. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403979544_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403979544_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-6220-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-7954-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)