Abstract
Anthropologists of contemporary Chinese religion have often pointed out that the lines between spirits, ghosts, and ancestors are highly permeable. Indeed, the primary difference between them is to be found in food—both in the types of food offered and the ways in which it is given. Ghosts are dead humans who are not fed by living descendants (and thus become hungry and highly dangerous, but also objects of offerings by individuals outside of more established avenues of worship); ancestors are fed by their living descendants (and thus are not dangerous and may even be helpful to the descendants); and spirits are fed by larger numbers of people than just simply their descendants (and thus become far more powerful than ghosts or ancestors). Moreover, each of these can become any of the others if the food offerings are changed: a ghost can become an ancestor, an ancestor can become a ghost, a ghost can become a spirit. In other words, it is living humans, through the act of feeding, who define the differences between spirits, ghosts, and ancestors.1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Boileau, Gilles (1998–99). “Some Ritual Elaborations on Cooking and Sacrifice in Late Zhou and Western Han Texts” Early China 23–24: 89–123.
Brashier, K. E. (1996). “Han Thanatology and the Division of ‘Souls,’” Early China 21: 125–58.
Campany, Robert (1992). “Xunzi and Durkheim as Theorists of Ritual Practice,” in Frank Reynolds and David Tracy eds., Discourse and Practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Carr, Michael (1985). “Personation of the Dead in Ancient China,” Computational Analyses of Asian and African Languages 24: 1–107.
Falkenhausen, Lothar von (1994). “Sources of Taoism: Reflections on Archaeological Indicators of Religious Change in Eastern Zhou China,” Taoist Resources 5.2: 1–12.
Harrel, C. Stevan (1974). “When a God Becomes a Ghost,” in Arthur P. Wolf ed., Religion and Ritual in Chinese Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 193–206.
Jordan, David (1972). Gods, Ghosts, and Ancestors: The Folk Religion of a Taiwanese Village. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Keightley, David N. (2004). “The Making of the Ancestors: Late Shang Religion and Its Legacy,” in John Lagerwey ed., Religion and Chinese Society. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong, vol. 1: 3–63.
Kern, Martin (2001). “Ritual, Text, and the Formation of the Canon: Historical Transitions of wen in Early China,” T’oung Pao 87.1–3: 43–91.
Legge, James (1885). Li Chi: Book of Rites. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Loewe, Michael (1974). Crisis and Conflict in Han China: 104 B.C.-A.D. 9. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Loewe, Michael — (1979). Ways to Paradise: The Chinese Quest for Immortality. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Nylan, Michael (1997). “Han Classicists Writing about Their Own Tradition,” Philosophy East and West 47.2: 133–88.
Nylan, Michael — (1999). “A Problematic Model: The Han ‘Orthodox Synthesis.’ Then and Now,” in Kai-wing Chow et al. eds., Imagining Boundaries: Changing Confucian Doctrines, Texts, and Her meneutics. Albany: State University of New York Press, 17–56.
Nylan, Michael (2001). The Five “Confucian” Classics. New Haven:Yale University Press.
Puett, Michael (2001). The Ambivalence of Creation: Debates Concerning Innovation and Artifice in Early China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Puett, Michael — (2002). To Become a God: Cosmology, Sacrifice, and Self-Divinization in Early China. Cambridge: Harvard University Asia Center.
Puett, Michael — (2004). “The Ethics of Responding Properly: The Notion of Qing in Early Chinese Thought,” in Halvor Eifring ed., Love and Emotions in Traditional Chinese Literature. Leiden: Brill, 37–68.
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1965). “Religion and Society,” in Structure and Function in Primitive Society. NewYork: The Free Press.
Rawson, Jessica (1999). “Ancient Chinese Ritual as Seen in the Material Record,” in Joseph P McDermott ed., State and Court Ritual in China. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, 20–49.
Rawson, Jessica — (2000). “Cosmological Systems as Sources of Art, Ornament and Design,” Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities 72: 133–89.
Sangren, Steven (1987). History and Magical Power in a Chinese Community. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Seidel, Anna (1982). “Tokens of Immortality in Han Graves,” Numen 29: 79–114.
Seidel, Anna — (1987). “Traces of Han Religion in Funeral Texts Found in Tombs,” in Akitsuki Kan’ei 秋月観英 ed., Dōkyō to shūkyō bunka 道教と宗教文化. Tokyo: Hirakawa shuppansha, 21–57.
Sterckx, Roel (2002). The Animal and the Daemon in Early China. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Watson, James L. and Evelyn S. Rawski (1988). Death Ritual in Late Imperial and Modern China. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Weller, Robert P. (1987). Unities and Diversities in Chinese Religion. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Wilson, Thomas (2002). “Sacrifice and the Imperial Cult of Confucius,” History of Religions 41.3: 251–87.
Wolf, Arthur P. (1974). “Gods, Ghosts, and Ancestors,” in Arthur P. Wolf ed., Religion and Ritual in Chinese Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 131–82.
Wu Hung (1988). “From Temple to Tomb: Ancient Chinese Art and Religion in Transition,” Early China 13: 78–115.
Yu Ying-Shih (1987). “‘O Soul, Come Back!’ A Study in the Changing Conceptions of the Soul and Afterlife in Pre-Buddhist China,” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 47.2: 363–95.
Zito, Angela (1997). Of Body and Brush: Grand Sacrifice as Text/Performance in Eighteenth-Century China. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2005 Roel Sterckx
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Puett, M. (2005). The Offering of Food and the Creation of Order: The Practice of Sacrifice in Early China. In: Sterckx, R. (eds) Of Tripod and Palate. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403979278_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403979278_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-52746-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-7927-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)