Abstract
In the 1894 short story “Regret,” Kate Chopin presents the female character of Mamzelle Aurélie as a figure of conventional masculinity. In her “man’s hat” and “old blue army coat,” Chopin tells us, she is essentially alone, except for the companionship of her dog. However, when her neighbor Odile shows up one day and leaves her four children to stay with her for two weeks, Mamzelle Aurélie begins to learn there is more to mothering—to her surprise—than just feeding and sheltering children. Through the education of Mamzelle Aurélie, who is taught how to mother by her cook, Aunt Ruby, and especially by the children themselves, Chopin raises the question of women’s essential nature. In contrast to other Chopin stories, such as The Awakening and “Athénaïse,” which raise similar questions, “Regret” reconfigures conventional Victorian assumptions about woman’s maternal “instinct” and suggests that it is the presence of children—not solely biology—that is the key to unlocking the maternal response. Through the character of Mamzelle Aurélie, Chopin constructs a far less conventional role for older women, one that draws upon the two predominant feminist schools of thought at the time: the essentialist and the antiessentialist approaches to woman’s “nature.” As a result, Chopin develops a mature female character whose newly found maternal instincts and inherent independence anticipate the New Woman of the next century and collapse the binary categories of feminist thought in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Works Cited
Banner, Lois W. Women in Modern America: A Brief History. 2nd ed. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1984. Print.
Bern, Sandra Lipsitz. The Lenses of Gender. New Haven: Yale UP, 1993. Print.
Bendel-Simso, Mary M. “Mothers, Women, and Creole Mother-Women in Kate Chopin’s South.” Southern Studies 3.1 (1992): 35–44. Print.
Chopin, Kate. “Athénaïse.” The Complete Works of Kate Chopin. Ed. Per Seyersted. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State UP, 1969. 426–54. Print.
——. The Awakening. Ed. Margo Culley. 2nd ed. 1899. New York: Norton, 1994. Print.
——. “Charlie.” Seyersted 638–70.
——. “The Godmother.” A Vocation and a Voice. Ed. Emily Toth. New York: Penguin, 1991. 164–88. Print.
——. “Regret.” A Matter of Prejudice and Other Stories. New York: Bantam Classic, 1992. 157–61. Print.
Deland, Margaret. “The Change in the Feminine Ideal”. The Atlantic Monthly 105 (1910): 8. Print.
Frye, Katie Berry. “Edna Pontellier, Adèle Ratignolle, and the Unnamed Nurse: A Triptych of Maternity in The Awakening.” Southern Studies 13.3/4 (2006): 45–66. Print.
Fuss, Diana. “Reading Like a Feminist.” The Essential Difference. Ed. Naomi Schor and Elizabeth Weed. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1994. Print.
Gordon, Linda. “Putting Children First: Women, Maternalism, and Welfare in the Early Twentieth Century.” U.S. History as Women’s History. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 1995. 63–86. Print.
Jewett, Sarah Orne. A Country Doctor. 1884. New York: Bantam Classic, 1999. Print.
Lattin, Patricia Hopkins. “Childbirth and Motherhood in The Awakening and in Athénaïse’.” Approaches to Teaching Chopin’s The Awakening. Ed. Bernard Koloski. New York: MLA, 1988. 40–6. Print.
Ross, Virginia. “Kate Chopin’s Motherless Heroine.” Southern Mothers: Fact and Fiction in Southern Women’s Writing. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State UP, 1999. 51–63. Print.
Scott, Loan Wallach. “Deconstructing Equality-Versus-Difference: Or, the Uses of Poststructuralist Theory for Feminism.” Feminist Theory Reader. Ed. Carole R. McCann and Seung-kyung Kim. New York: Routledge, 2003. 378–90. Print.
Schweiter, Ivy. “Maternal Discourse and the Romance of Self-Possession in Kate Chopin’s The Awakening.” Gendered Agents: Women and Institutional Knowledge. Eds. Silvestro Mariniello and Paul Bové. Durham: Duke UP, 1998. 161–91. Print.
Yalom, Marilyn. A History of the Wife. New York: HarperCollins, 2001. Print.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2015 Heather Ostman and Kate O’Donoghue
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ostman, H. (2015). Maternity vs. Autonomy in Chopin’s “Regret”. In: Ostman, H., O’Donoghue, K. (eds) Kate Chopin in Context. American Literature Readings in the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137543967_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137543967_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-56456-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54396-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)