Skip to main content

Abstract

Social, cultural and historical contingencies aside, violence is an anthropological constant of mankind. Because of our corporeality we can harm people and we know we can be harmed by others.1 Not only violence itself but also the potential for it and the collective struggle to keep it at bay are therefore major driving forces behind the emergence of social order.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. H. Popitz (1992) Phänomene der Macht (Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr), p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Sofsky (1996) Traktat ĂĽber die Gewalt (Frankfurt/M.: Fischer), p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Durkheim (2013) The Division of Labour in Society (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Bataille (1986) Death and Sensuality: A Study of Eroticism and the Taboo (San Francisco: City Lights Books), p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. Giesen (2004) Triumph and Trauma (Boulder: Paradigm Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Wieviorka (2003) “Violence and the Subject”, Thesis Eleven, 73(1), 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wieviorka, 2003; M. Wieviorka (2009) Violence. A New Approach (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. P. Reemtsma (2012) Trust and Violence. An Essay on a Modern Relationship (Princeton: Princeton University Press), pp. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. Sofsky (1993) Die Ordnung des Terrors. Das Konzentrationslager (Frankfurt/M.: Fischer), p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Foucault (1977) Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews (Oxford: Blackwell), p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. F. Baumeister (2001) Evil. Inside Human Violence and Cruelty (New York: Holt Paperback), pp. 60–96.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Fludernik (2014) “A Narratology of the Law? Narratives in Legal Discourse”, Critical Analysis of Law and the New Interdisciplinarity, 1(1), 88–109.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Ricoeur (1971) “Narrative Time”, in W. J. T. Mitchell (ed.) On Narrative (Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press), pp. 165–186.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. J. T. Mitchell (1971) “Foreword”, in W. J. T. Mitchell (ed.) On Narrative (Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. R. Huesmann (2007) “The Impact of Electronic Media Violence: Scientific Theory and Research”, Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6).

    Google Scholar 

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Tannen and C. Wallat (1987) “Interactive Frames and Knowledge Schemas in Interaction: Examples from a Medical Examination/Interview”, Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Marco Gerster, Steffen Krämer and Daniel Ziegler

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gerster, M., Krämer, S., Ziegler, D. (2015). Introduction. In: Ziegler, D., Gerster, M., Krämer, S. (eds) Framing Excessive Violence. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137514431_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics