Skip to main content

A Discourse-Theoretical Approach to Death and Dying

  • Chapter
The Social Construction of Death

Abstract

Death is one of the most pervasive phenomena of the social, and sometimes is described as ‘the only certainty in life’. Death is indeed often considered the ultimate biological essentialism; the moment at which humanity’s obsession with control finds an absolute limit (Giddens, 1991), a view that seems to result in a privileging of realist and materialist approaches over constructivist and idealist treatments. Obviously, the bodily condition labelled death has a materialist dimension; it is an event/proces s that exists and occurs independently of human will, thought, and interpretation. We cannot reduce death to the way it is socially and culturally interpreted, but at the same time death remains loaded with meaning and we cannot detach it from the processes of social construction (Carpentier and Van Brussel, 2012).

Death, signs of: Relaxing of facial muscles, producing rather staring eyes and gaping mouth. Loss of curves of the back, which becomes flat against the bed or table. Slight discoloration of the skin, which becomes a waxy-yellow hue, and loses its pink transparency at the fingertips. (Medical dictionary, cited in Ball, 1976)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aries, P. (1974). Western attitudes towards death: from Middle Ages to the present. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aries, P. (1981). The hour of our death. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, D. (1987). ‘Silence and truth in death and dying’, Social Science and Medicine, 24(8), 651–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, M. (1976). Death. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banjeree, A. (2005). ‘Speaking of death: representations of death in hospice care’, InterCulture: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2(2). Retrieved from http://iph.fsu.edu/interculture/vol2.html, date accessed 1 October 2013.

  • Bell, A. (1991). The language of news media. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1992). Mortality and immortality. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, C. D. (2003). Handbook of death and dying. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpentier, N. (2010). ‘Deploying discourse theory: an introduction to discourse theory and discourse theoretical analysis’, in N. Carpentier et al. (eds) Media and Communication Studies Intersections and Interventions: The Intellectual Work of ECREA’s 2010 European Media and Communication Doctoral Summer School. Tartu: Tartu University Press, pp. 251–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpentier, N. and Van Brussel, L. (2012). ‘On the contingency of death: a discourse-theoretical perspective on the construction of death’, Critical Discourse Studies, 9(2), 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpentier, N. and De Cleen, B. (2007). ‘Bringing discourse theory into media studies’, Journal of Language and Politics, 6(2), 267–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2003). ‘Grounded theory’, in J. A. Smith (ed.) Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. London: Sage, pp. 81–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. et al. (2008). ‘Population-based study of dying in hospital in six European countries’, Palliative Medicine, 22(6), 702–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, S. R. (2009). Hospice and palliative care. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1985). The loneliness of the dying. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. Brighton: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (1999). The language of news media. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Stanford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynnos, J. and Howarth, D. (2007). Logics of critical explanation in social and political theory. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, D. (2005). ‘Applying discourse theory: the method of articulation’, in D. Howarth and J. Torfing (eds) Discourse Theory in European Politics. Hampshire: Palgrave, pp. 316–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, D. (1998). ‘Discourse theory and political analysis’, in E. Scarbrough and E. Tanenbaum (eds) Research Strategies in the Social Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 268–293.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, D. and Stavrakakis, Y. (2000). ‘Introducing discourse theory and political analysis’, in D. Howarth, A. J. Norval and Y. Stavrakakis (eds) Discourse Theory and Political Analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illich, I. (1975). Medical nemesis. London: Calder & Boyars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearl, M. (1989). Endings: a sociology of death and dying. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and social strategy: towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (1994). ‘Discourse analysis: a new methodology for understanding the ideologies of health and illness’, Australian Journal of Public Health, 16(2), 145–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (2003). ‘The social construction of medicine and the body’, in L. Albrecht, R. Fitzpatrick and S. C. Scrimshaw (eds) Handbook of Social Studies in Health and Medicine. London: Sage, pp. 50–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (2010). Medicine as culture: illness, disease and the body in western societies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, A. (2003). Textual analysis: a beginner’s guide. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, L. (1989). The social organization of death. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. (1992). The Blackwell companion to major classical social theories. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seale, C. (1995). ‘Heroic death’, Sociology, 29(4), 597–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seale, C. (1998). Constructing death: the sociology of dying and bereavement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seale, C. (2000). ‘Changing patterns of death and dying’, Social Science and Medicine, 51(6): 917–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seale, C. (2002). Media and health. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seale, C. (2004). ‘Media constructions of dying alone: a form of bad death’, Social Science and Medicine, 58(5), 967–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, M. (2001). Death talk: the case against euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Quebec: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slomka, J. (1992). ‘The negotiation of death: clinical decision making at the end of life’, Social Science and Medicine, 35(3), 251–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torfing, J. (1999). New theories of discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Brussel, L. and Carpentier, N. (2012). ‘The construction of the good death and the dying person: a discourse-theoretical analysis of Belgian newspaper articles on medical end-of-life decision making’, Journal of Language and Politics, 11(4), 479–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, T. (1994). The revival of death. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, T., Littlewood, J. and Pickering, M. (1995). ‘Death in the news: the public invigilation of private emotion’, Sociology, 29(4), 579–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. (2004). ‘Is there such a thing as a good death’, Palliative Medicine, 18(5), 404–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S.J. (2003). Medicine and the body. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zienkowski, J. (2012). ‘Overcoming the post-structural methodological deficit — metapragmatic markers and interpretive logics in a critique of the Bologna process’, Pragmatics, 22(3), 501–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Leen Van Brussel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Van Brussel, L. (2014). A Discourse-Theoretical Approach to Death and Dying. In: Van Brussel, L., Carpentier, N. (eds) The Social Construction of Death. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137391919_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics