Skip to main content

Measuring Outcomes for Children with Brain Injury: Challenges and Solutions

  • Chapter
  • 282 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter aims to examine the broad contextual issues associated with the challenges of measuring outcome meaningfully for children and their families. First, concepts of disability, rehabilitation and outcome will be outlined. Second, consideration of how the context of public policy developments and societal attitudes to hearing children’s opinions and wishes as part of their intervention are changing how services could be delivered. Third, ways of measuring outcome meaningfully using both quantitative and qualitative methods will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beck, J.S., Beck, A.T., Jolly, J.B. and Steer, R.A. (2005) Beck Youth Inventories Manual Second Edition (San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedell, G. (2004) Developing a follow-up survey focused on participation of children and youth with acquired brain injury after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Neurological Rehabilitation 19, 191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedell, G. (2009) Further validation of the Child and Adolescent Scale of Participation (CASP). Developmental Neurorehabilitation 12, 342–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourke-Taylor, H.M. and Pallant, J.F. (2013) The Assistance to Participate Scale to measure play and leisure support for children with developmental disability: Update following Rasch analysis. Child: Care, Health &amp, Developments, 544–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke-Taylor, H.M., Law, M., Howie, L. and Pallant, J.F. (2009) Development of the Assistance to Participate Scale (APS) for children’s play and leisure activities. Child: Care, Health and Development 35, 738–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke-Taylor, H.M., Howie, L. and Law, M. (2010) Impact of caring for a school aged child with a disability: Understanding mothers’ perspectives. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 57, 127–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, J., Alvis Palma, D. and Whitehouse, L. (2008) Learning as a context for differences and differences as a context for learning. Journal of Family Therapy 30, 529–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, B. and McGoldrick, M. (1988) The Changing Family Life Cycle: A Framework for Family Therapy (New York, NY: Gardner Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (2012) Chief Medical Officer’s Annual Report 2012: Our Children Deserve Better: Prevention Pays (London: Department of Health).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coster, W. and Khentani, M.A. (2008) Measuring participation of children with disabilities: Issues and challenges. Disability &amp, Rehabilitation 30, 639–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coster, W., Bedell, G., Law, M., Khetani, M.A., Teplicky, R., Liljenquist, K., et al. (2011) Psychometric evaluation of the participation and environment measure for children and youth. Developmental Medicine &amp, Child Neurology 53, 1030–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, C, Zanotti, C, Morgan, A., Currie, D., de Looze, M., Roberts, C, et al. (2012) Social determinants of health and well-being among young people.

    Google Scholar 

  • Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: International report from the 2009/2010 survey. Available at: http://www.euro.who.int/_data/assets/pdf_file/0003/163857/Social-determinants-of-health-and-well-being-among-young-people.pdf (accessed 17 November 2014).

  • Donders, J. (2013) Traumatic brain injury. In S. J. Hunter and J. Donders (eds) Pediatric Neuropsychological Intervention, pp. 91–111 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education (2003) Every Child Matters (London: Crown Publisher).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education (2014) SEND Code of Practice (London: Department for Education).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (2011) Justice for Hedgehogs (Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, N.B., Baldwin, L.M. and Bishop, D.S. (1983) The McMaster Family Assessment Device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 9, 171–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fallowfleld, L. (1990) The Quality of Life: The Missing Measurement in Healthcare (London: Souvenir Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, G.A., Isquith, PK., Guy, S.C. and Kenworthy L. (2000a) Test review: Behavior rating inventory of executive function. Child Neuropsychology 6, 235–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, G.A., Isquith, PK., Guy, S.C. and Kenworthy, L. (2000b) BRIEF: Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function Professional Manual (Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glang, A., Ettel, D., Todis, D., Gordon, W., Oswald, J., Vaughn, S, et al. (in press) Services and supports for students with TBI: Survey of state education agencies. Exceptionality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, A.L. and di Maggio, A. (2012) Rehabilitation for children after acquired brain injury: Current and emerging approaches. Pediatric Neurology 46, 339–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R. (1997) The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 38, 581–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gracey F., Evans, J.J. and Malley D. (2009) Capturing process and outcome in complex rehabilitation interventions: A ‘Y-shaped’ model. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 19, 867–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, L.A., Banks, P. and Terras, M.M. (2013) Secondary school transition for children with special educational needs: A literature review. British Journal of Learning Support 28, 24–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, G., Law, M., King, S., Hurley, P., Hanna, S., Kertoy M., et al. (2004) Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and Preferences for Activities of Children (PAC) (San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, J.-S., Nowinksi, C, Victorson, D., Bode, R., Podrabsky T., McKinney N., et al. (2012) Quality of life measures in children with neurological conditions: Neuro-QOL. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 26, 36–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley S.R., Wilde, E.A., Anderson, VA., Bedell, G., Beers, S.R., Campbell, T.F., et al. (2012) Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in pediatric traumatic brain injury research. Journal of Neurotrauma 29, 678–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConachie, H., Colver, A.F., Forsyth, R.J., Jarvis, S.N. and Parkinson, K.N. (2006) Participation of disabled children: How should it be characterised and measured? Disability & Rehabilitation 28, 1157–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preparing for Adulthood (2013) Developing the preparation for adulthood section of the local offer: A guide. Available at: http://www.preparingforadulthood.org.uk/media/334105/se7_preparation_for_adulthood_booklet_flnal.pdf (accessed 17 November 2014).

  • Public Health England (2013) How Healthy Behaviour Supports Children’s Wellbeing (PHE publications gateway number 2013146) (London: Health & Wellbeing Directorate).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, J. and Warner-Rodgers, J. (2008) (eds) Child Neuropsychology: Concepts, Theory and Practice (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ, S.A., Larson, K., Franke, T.M. and Halfon, N. (2009) Associations between media use and health in US children. Academic Pediatrics 9, 300–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M.I., Slovak, K., Frierson, T. and York, P. (1998) Viewing preferences, symptoms of psychological trauma, and violent behaviors among children who watch television. Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp, Adolescent Psychiatry 37, 1041–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tal, G. and Tirosh, E. (2013) Rehabilitation of children with traumatic brain injury: A critical review. Pediatric Neurology 48, 424–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, H.G., Yeates, K.O., Wade, S., Drotar, D., Stancin, T. and Burant, C (2001) Bidirectional child-family influences on outcomes of traumatic brain injury in children. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 7, 755–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, D. and Weatherhead, S. (2013) Outcome evidence. In: S. Weatherhead (ed.) Narrative Approaches to Brain Injury, pp. 185–208 (London: Karnac Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Government (1995) Disability Discrimination Act. Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1995/50/contents (accessed 17 November 2014).

  • UK Government (2014) Children and Families Act. Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/6/pdfs/ukpga_20140006_en.pdf (accessed 17 November 2014).

  • United Nations. (1989) UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (London: UNICEF).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations High Commission for Refugees (2012) Listen and Learn: A Guide to Participatory Assessment with Children and Adolescents (Geneva: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund Office of Research (2013) Child Well-being in Rich Countries: A Comparative Overview, Innocenti Report Card 11 (Florence: UNICEF Office of Research).

    Google Scholar 

  • Varni, J.W., Seid, M. and Rode, CA. (1999) The PedsQL ™: Measurement model for the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™. Medical Care 37, 126–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varni, J.W., Seid, M. and Kurtin, P.S. (2001) PedsQL 4.0: Reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Medical Care 39, 800–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vetere, A. and Dallos, R. (2001. Working Systemically with Families: Formulation, Intervention and Evaluation (London: H Karnac (Books) Ltd).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, S.L., Taylor, H.G., Drotar, D., Stancin, T., Yeates, K.O. and Minich, N.M. (2002) A prospective study of long-term caregiver and family adaptation following brain injury in children. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 17, 96–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B.A., Gracey, R, Evans, J.J. and Bateman, A. (2009) Neuropsychological Rehabilitation: Theory, Models, Therapy and Outcomes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) (Geneva: World Health Organization).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeates, K O., Taylor, H.G., Walz, N.C., Stancin, T. and Wade, S.L. (2010) The family environment as a moderator of psychosocial outcomes following traumatic brain injury in young children. Neuropsychology 2, 345–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ylvisaker, M. (2003). Context sensitive cognitive rehabilitation: Theory and practice. Brain Impairment 4, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Sophie Gosling

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gosling, S. (2015). Measuring Outcomes for Children with Brain Injury: Challenges and Solutions. In: Reed, J., Byard, K., Fine, H. (eds) Neuropsychological Rehabilitation of Childhood Brain Injury. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137388223_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics