Abstract
When looking at the division of paid and unpaid work and its societal determinants from a cross-nationally comparative perspective, much earlier research had investigated the role of country-specific labour market and welfare state institutions (for example Fuwa, 2004; Treas and Drobnic, 2010; Hofäcker et al., 2013). Following this line of argument, cross-national differences in the division of paid and unpaid labour were to be explained by differences in, for example, care policies and dominant working time regimes. In comparison, gender-sensitive value orientations have been under-represented in most explanatory models. This neglect in previous research is all the more pressing because the cultural dimension has only rarely been discussed in inequality-relevant research.1 Even though gender roles are often discussed in the literature, they are also mostly considered as purely structural context conditions. Furthermore, the discussion does not reveal much about the link (or the lack thereof) between gender identity, behaviour and the cultural norms and values in a given society. We follow Risman and Davis’s conceptualization of gender as a structure
which embeds cultural dimension as the non-reflexive habituated rules, patterns and beliefs, which organize much of human life. The taken-for-granted or cognitive images that belong to the situational context […] are the cultural aspect of the gender structure, the interactional expectations that each of us meet in every social encounter.
(2013: 744)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker, G. S. (1985) ‘Human Capital, Effort, and the Sexual Division of Labor’, Journal of Labor Economics, 3 (1), 33–58.
Blossfeld, H. P. and Drobnic, S. (2001) Careers of Couples in Contemporary Society: From Male Breadwinner to Dual-Earner Families (Oxford: University Press).
Carpenter, R. C. (2003) ‘“Women and Children First”: Gender, Norms, and Humanitarian Evacuation in the Balkans 1991–95’, International Organization, 57 (4), 661–694.
Davis, S. N. and Greenstein, T. N. (2013) ‘Why Study Housework? Cleaning as a Window into Power in Couples’, Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5 (2), 63–71.
Deacon, B. (1993) ‘Developments in East European Social Policy’, New Perspectives on the Welfare State in Europe, 2, 177–197.
Erler, D. (2009) ‘Germany: Taking a Nordic turn?’ in S. B. Kamerman and P. Moss (eds) The Politics of Parental Leave Policies: Children, Parenting, Gender and the Labour Market (Bristol: Policy Press), pp. 119–134.
Esping-Andersen, G. (2013) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons).
Esping-Andersen, G., Boertien, D., Bonke, J. and Gracia, P. (2013) ‘Couple Specialization in Multiple Equilibria’, European Sociological Review, 29 (6), 1280–1294.
Esser, H. (1990) ‘“Habits”, “Frames” und “Rational Choice”’. Die Reichweite von Theorien der rationalen Wahl (am Beispiel der Erklärung des Befragtenverhaltens)’ [Habits, Frames and Rational Choice — the range of tehories of rational action (using the example of explaining respondent behavior)], Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 19 (4), 231–247.
Esser, H. (1991) ‘Die Rationalität des Alltagshandelns. Eine Rekonstruktion der Handlungstheorie von Alfred Schütz’ [The rationality of everyday behaviour. A reconstruction of Alfred Schütz’s theory of action], Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 20 (6), 430–445.
Fenger, H. J. M. (2007) ‘Welfare Regimes in Central and Eastern Europe: Incorporating Post-Communist Countries in a Welfare Regime Typology’, Contemporary Issues and Ideas in Social Sciences, 3 (2), 1–30.
Fodor, É. (2001) ‘The Feminization of Poverty in Six Post-Socialist Societies’, Szociologiai Szemle, 4, 96–113.
Fuwa, M. (2004) ‘Macro-Level Gender Inequality and the Division of Household Labor in 22 Countries’, American Sociological Review, 69 (6), 751–767.
Goffman, E. (1986) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience, North-eastern University Press Edition (Boston: Northeastern University Press).
Hofäcker, D., Stoilova, R. and Riebling, J. R. (2013) ‘The Gendered Division of Paid and Unpaid Work in Different Institutional Regimes: Comparing West Germany, East Germany and Bulgaria’, European Sociological Review, 29 (2), 192–209.
Ostner, I. and Lewis, J. (1995) ‘Gender and the Evolution of European Social Policy’ in S. Leibfried and P. Pierson (eds) European Social Policy: Between Fragmentation and Integration (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution), pp. 159–193.
Pfau-Effinger, B. (2000) Kultur und Frauenerwerbstätigkeit in Europa: Theorie und Empirie des internationalen Vergleichs [Culture and Women’s Employment in Europe: Theory and Empirical evidence of International Comparison] (Opladen: Leske + Budrich).
Risman, B. J. and Davis, G. (2013) ‘From Sex Roles to Gender Structure’, Current Sociology, 61 (5–6), 733–755.
Schmitt, N. (1996) ‘Uses and Abuses of Coefficient Alpha’, Psychological Assessment, 8 (4), 350.
StataCorp (2009) Stata Statistical Software: Release 11 (College Station, Texas: StataCorp LP).
Stoilova, R. (2007) ‘Impact of Gender on the Occupational Group of Software Producers in Bulgaria’ in R. Stoilova and R. Kirov (eds) Changes of Work and Knowledge-Based Society, Sociological Problems, Special Issue, pp. 94–116.
Stoilova, R. and Haralampiev, K. (2008) ‘Stratification in Bulgaria. Measuring the Impact of Origin, Age, Gender and Ethnicity on Educational Attainment and Labour Market Placement’, Annuaire De L’Université de Sofia, 89–105.
Stoilova, R., Simeonova-Ganeva, R. and Kotzeva, T. (2012) ‘Determinants of Gender Disparities in Labour Income: The Case of Bulgaria’, International Journal of Sociology, 42 (3), 54–78.
Treas, J. and Drobnic, S. (2010) Dividing the Domestic: Men, Women, and Household Work in Cross-National Perspective (Stanford: University Press).
UNECE (2007) Generations & Gender Programme: Concepts and Guidelines (Geneva: United Nations Publications).
Van Oorschot, W. (2008) ‘Popular Deservingness Perceptions and Conditionality of Solidarity in Europe’ in W. Van Oorschot, M. Opielka and B. Pfau-Effinger (eds) Culture and Welfare State: Values and Social Policy in Comparative Perspective (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar), pp. 268–288.
Vikat, A., Spéder, Z., Beets, G., Billari, F. C., Bühler, C., Désesquelles, A., Fokkema, T., Hoem, J. M., MacDonald, A., Neyer, G., Pailhé, A., Pinnelli, A. and Solaz, A. (2007) ‘Generations and Gender Survey (GGS): Towards a Better Understanding of Relationships and Processes in the Life Course’, Demographic Research, 17, 389–439.
Weber, M. (1922) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie (Tübingen: Mohr).
West, C. and Zimmerman, D. H. (1987) ‘Doing Gender’, Gender & Society, 1 (2), 125–151.
Winker, G. and Degele, N. (2011) ‘Intersectionality as Multi-Level Analysis: Dealing with Social Inequality’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 18 (1), 51–66.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Jan Rasmus Riebling, Rumiana Stoilova and Dirk Hofäcker
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Riebling, J.R., Stoilova, R., Hofäcker, D. (2016). Habits or Frames? Explaining Patterns in the Division of Paid and Unpaid Work in Germany, Bulgaria, France and Hungary. In: Roosalu, T., Hofäcker, D. (eds) Rethinking Gender, Work and Care in a New Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137371096_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137371096_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57128-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37109-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)