Abstract
If any single German writer comes close to the importance which Henry David Thoreau possesses in American culture as principal founder of the national ‘environmental imagination’ (Lawrence Buell), it is Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749–1832). Goethe’s standing as the greatest German writer in modern times is undisputed, and nature has been central to public interest in his work: “Nature is the concept which stood at the very centre of Goethe interpretation from the very beginning and still does today”, writes Karl Robert Mandelkow.1 On the basis of his poems, novels, plays and essays, he was already understood by his friend and collaborator Schiller, together with his Romantic contemporaries, as an advocate of nature and a poet of sensual perception. From the middle of the nineteenth century on, the conception of nature expounded in his voluminous scientific studies has also been a matter of constant debate and served repeatedly as a source of inspiration. Arguments based on Goethe have been at the heart of an ‘alternative’ German discourse on nature and environment over the past century and a half, and Goethe’s influence on the literature of nature in Germany is greater than that of any other writer.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Karl Robert Mandelkow, ‘Natur und Geschichte bei Goethe im Spiegel seiner wissenschaftlichen und kulturtheoretischen Rezeption’, in Matussek 1998: 233–58, here p. 233.
Jost Hermand, ‘Freiheit in der Bindung: Goethes grüne Weltfrömmigkeit’ (1991b: 29–51).
Marshall Berman, ‘Goethe’s Faust: The Tragedy of Development’, in Berman 1983: 37–86, here p. 38.
As Jeffrey Barnouw puts it: “In his expansive ‘striving’ Faust embodies an indifference to our vulnerability and fallibility that is too often attributed misguidedly to a ‘Faustian’ ethos of technology” (1994: 40).
Harro Segeberg, ‘Technik und Naturbeherrschung im Konflikt I. Johann Wolfgang von Goethes Faust. Zweiter Teil V. Akt (1832) und die Modernität vormoderner Technik’ (1987a: 13–54).
Hanns Cibulka, Sanddornzeit. Tagebuchblätter von Hiddensee (Halle-Leipzig: Mitteldeutscher Verlag 1971). References in the text are to the reprint in Cibulka 1991 (pp. 5–73).
Hanns Cibulka, Swantow. Die Aufzeichnungen des Andreas Flemming, HalleLeipzig: Mitteldeutscher Verlag 1982. References are to the reprint in Cibulka 1991 (pp. 75–171).
Klaus Modick, Moos. Die nachgelassenen Blätter des Botanikers Lukas Ohlburg, Zurich: Haffmans 1984. References in the text are to the second edition (Modick 1996).
See Reid, 1990 on Hans Faust and Hinze und Kunze, and Grauert 1995: 166–206 on Iphigenie in Freiheit.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Axel Goodbody
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goodbody, A. (2007). Goethe as Ecophilosophical Inspiration and Literary Model. In: Nature, Technology and Cultural Change in Twentieth-Century German Literature. New Perspectives in German Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230589629_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230589629_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35840-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-58962-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)