Skip to main content

Multiple Arenas, Multiple Populations: Counting Organized Interests in Scottish Public Policy

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Interest Groups, Advocacy and Democracy Series ((IGAD))

Abstract

The basic premise of this book is that counting populations of organized interests is a worthwhile activity. The opening chapter – not to mention many of the contributions – provides numerous persuasive reasons. In this chapter, all this is taken for granted, and it pursues some of the challenges inherent in actually counting populations. It starts with what seems at face value to be a single perfectly reasonable and achievable aspiration in relation to data on organized interest populations – namely, to be able to say something authoritative about the basic size and composition of the politically active organized interest system. This is a deceptively difficult task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baumgartner, F. and B. Leech (2001) ‘Interest Niches and Policy Bandwagons: Patterns of Interest Group Involvement in National Politics’, Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1191–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F., H. Larsen-Price, B. Leech, and P. Rutledge (2011) ‘Congressional and Presidential Effects on the Demand for Lobbying’, Political Research Quarterly, 64 (1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout, J. and D. Lowery (2008) ‘Counting Organized Interests in the European Union: A Comparison of Data Sources’, Journal of European Public Policy, 15(4), 489–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. (1999) The New Liberalism: The Rising Power of Citizen Groups (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairney, P. (2006) ‘The Analysis of Scottish Parliament Committee Influence: Beyond Capacity and Structure in Comparing West European Legislatures’, European Journal of Political Research, 45, 181–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairney, P. (2008) ‘Has Devolution Changed the “British Policy Style”?’, British Politics, 3, 350–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, M., D. Marsh, and M. Smith (1995) ‘The Relationship between Policy Networks and Sectoral and Sub-sectoral Levels: A Response to Jordan, Maloney and McLaughlin’, Public Administration, 73, 627–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. (2002) ‘Consultation for a Change? Engaging Users and Communities in the Policy Process’, Social Policy and Administration, 36(5), 516–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, W. (2001) ‘Pressure Politics: From “Insider” Politics to Direct Action?’, Parliamentary Affairs, 54(2), 337–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, V. and D. Lowery (1996/2000) The Population Ecology of Interest Representation: Lobbying Communities in the American States (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grønbjerg, K. A. (2002), ‘Evaluating Nonprofit Databases’, American Behavioral Scientist, 45(11), 1741–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpin, D. (2011) ‘Organized Interests and Cascades of Attention: Unpacking Policy Bandwagon Dynamics’, Governance, 24(2), 205–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpin, D. and A. Binderkrantz (2011) ‘Explaining Breadth of Policy Engagement: Patterns of Interest Group Mobilization in Public Policy’, Journal of European Public Policy, 18(2), 201–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpin, D. and H. Thomas (forthcoming) ‘Evaluating the Breadth of Policy Engagement by Organized Interests’, Public Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, G. and W. A. Maloney (1995) ‘Policy Networks Expanded: A Comment on Cavanagh, Marsh and Smith’, Public Administration, 73, 630–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, G. and W. A. Maloney (2001) ‘Britain: Change and Continuity within the New Realities of British Politics’, in C. Thomas (ed.) Political Parties and Interest Groups: Shaping Democratic Governance (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, G. and J. Richardson (1987) Government and Pressure Groups in Britain (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, G., J. Richardson, and G. Dudley (1984) ‘Evidence to Parliamentary Committees as Access to the Policy Process’ in D. Hill (ed.) Parliamentary Select Committees in Action: A Symposium (Strathclyde Papers in Government and Politics No. 24).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, G., W. A. Maloney, and M. McLaughlin (1994) ‘Characterizing Agricultural Policy-Making’, Public Administration, 72, 505–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, D. and V. Gray (2004) ‘Bias in the Heavenly Chorus: Interests in Society and before Government’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 16(1), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, D., V. Gray, J. Anderson, and A. Newmark (2004) ‘Collective Action and the Mobilization of Institutions’, Journal of Politics, 66(3), 684–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, I. (1986) Policy Making in a Three Party System: Committees, Coalitions, and Parliament (London: Methuen).

    Google Scholar 

  • May, T. C., J. McHugh, and T. Taylor (1998) ‘Business Representation in the UK since 1979: The Case of Trade Associations’, Political Studies, 46, 260–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, R. T. (1958) ‘Parties, Pressure Groups and the British Political Process’, Political Quarterly, 29(1), 5–16. Reprinted in R. Kimber and J. Richardson (eds.) Pressure Groups in Britain (London: Dent, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, E. C. (2003) ‘The Civil Servant as Legislator: Law Making in British Administration’, Public Administration, 81(4), 651–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, E. and B. Jenkins (2005) Policy Bureaucracy: Government with a Cast of Thousands (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. J. and A. G. Jordan (1979) Governing under Pressure (Oxford: Martin Robertson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. (1984) Do Parties Make a Difference? 2nd edn. (London: Macmillan and Chatham).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, R. H. (1984) ‘Interest Representation: The Dominance of Interest Groups’, American Political Science Review, 78(1), 64–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, R. H. (1990) ‘The Paradox of Interest Groups in Washington’, in A. King (ed.) New American Political System, 2nd edn. (Washington, DC: AEI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E. E. (1960) The Semi-Sovereign People (New York: Holt, Reinhart, and Winston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlozman, K. (2010) ‘Who Sings in the Heavenly Chorus? The Shape of the Organized Interest System,’ in J. Berry (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of American Political Parties and Interest Groups (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P. (2008) ‘The Design of Social and Political Research’, in D. della Porta and M. Keating (eds.) Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, M. (2004) ‘Campaigning for Older People: A Case Study Approach to the Input of Voluntary and Community Organisations in the Policy Process’, Social Policy and Society, 3(4), 343–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1995) Political Organizations, rev. edn. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; originally published 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, J. T. (2000) ‘Using Media Based Data in Studies of Politics’, American Journal of Political Science, 44(1), 156–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yackee, J. and S. Yackee (2006) ‘A Bias toward Business? Assessing Interest Group Influence on the Bureaucracy’, Journal of Politics, 68, 128–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Darren Halpin, Graeme Baxter, and Iain MacLeod

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Halpin, D., Baxter, G., MacLeod, I. (2012). Multiple Arenas, Multiple Populations: Counting Organized Interests in Scottish Public Policy. In: Halpin, D., Jordan, G. (eds) The Scale of Interest Organization in Democratic Politics. Interest Groups, Advocacy and Democracy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230359239_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics