Skip to main content

The Cold War Comes to the Coldest Continent

  • Chapter
The European Antarctic

Abstract

The Second World War ended Western Europe’s leadership of the international system. Woodrow Wilson’s insistence upon self-determination at the 1919 Paris Peace conference was trumped by the demands of the victorious European states—principally Britain and France;1 perhaps Winston Churchill hoped that similar rhetoric in the Atlantic Charter, which he agreed with Franklin Delano Roosevelt off Newfoundland in August 1941, would also be forgotten. But by the war’s end, the balance of world power had clearly shifted. In 1947, the United States assumed economically stretched Britain’s military commitments in the Greek civil war, an early signal that geopolitical power now issued from Washington and Moscow. These same dynamics ended the supremacy of Europe in the Antarctic. The defining event in the Cold War Antarctic was the IGY, which buried the colonial-era legacy of territorial claims under massive displays of state-sponsored science and superpower competition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See for instance Klaus Dodds, Pink ice: Britain and the South Atlantic empire” (London: I.B. Tauris, 2002), and Adrian Howkins, “Frozen empires: a history of the Antarctic sovereignty dispute between Britain Argentina, and Chile, 1939–1959.” (PhD diss., University of Texas at Austin, 2008). and “Defending polar empire: opposition to India’s proposal to raise the ’Antarctic Question’ at the United Nations in 1956,” Polar Record 44 (2008): 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aant Elzinga, “Antarctica: the construction of a continent by and for science,” in Elisabeth Crawford, Terry Shinn, and Sverker Sörlin, eds. Denationalizing science: the contexts of international scientific practice (Dordrecht, Klüwer, 1993), 73–106.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Robert Marc Friedman, “Å spise kirsebær med de store,” in Norskpolarhistorie 2: vitenskapene, ed. Einar-Arne Drivenes and Harald Dag Jølle (Oslo: Gyldendal, 2004), 369.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See for instance Wendy Webster, Englishness and empire, 1939–65 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See for instance Jerry Hardman Brookshire, Clement Attlee (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995), 143–44.

    Google Scholar 

  6. This was particularly clear in the pamphlet prepared by the Imperial Institute for its “Focus on Colonial Progress” display. TNA WORK 25/244 E2/E37. See also Becky E Conekin, The autobiography of a nation: the Festival of Britain (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003), especially 188–89.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peter H. Hansen, “Coronation Everest: the Empire and Commonwealth in the ‘second Elizabethan age,’ “ in Stuart Ward, ed., British culture and the end of empire (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2001), 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Alan Milward, The reconstruction of Western Europe, 1945–1951 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984), 243–44.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Knut Einar Eriksen and Helge Øystein Pharo, Norsk utenrikspolitikkshistorie 5: kald krig og internasjon- alisering 1949–1965 (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1997), 144.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peter Beck, The international politics of Antarctica (New York: St Martin’s, 1986), 272.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Richard G. Casey, Friends and neighbours: Australia and the world (Melbourne: F. W. Cheshire, 1954), 115. As noted in the foreword (which did not bear a page number), Casey premised the book on Australia being “a link in the worldwide chain against international Communism.”

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dian Olson Belanger, Deep freeze: the United States, the International Geophysical Year, and the origins of Antarctica’s age of science (Boulder: University Press of Colorado, 2007), 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See most notably Ronald E. Doel, “Constituting the postwar earth sciences: the military’s influence on the environmental sciences in the USA after 1945,” Social Studies of Science 33 (2003): 635–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. On the Office of Naval Research and physical oceanography, see also Naomi Oreskes and Homer E. Le Grand, eds., Plate tectonics: an insider’s history of the modern theory of the Earth (Boulder, CO: Westview, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jacob Darwin Hamblin, Oceanographers and the Cold War: disciples of marine science (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  16. John McCannon, “No more Tsushimas: Soviet Arctic science 1945–1953,” presentation at the Rachel Carson Center, Munich, January 28, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  17. David Edgerton, Warfare state: Britain 1920–1970 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Olav Njølstad and Olav Wicken, Kunnskap som våpen: forsvarets forskningsinsti- tutt 1946–1975 (Oslo: Tano Aschehoug, 1997), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Klaus Dodds, “The great trek: New Zealand and the British/Commonwealth 1955–58 Trans-Antarctic Expedition,” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 33 (2005): 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. On Berkner’s life and career, see Allan A. Needell, Science, Cold War, and the American state: Lloyd V. Berkner and the balance of professional ideals (Amsterdam: Harwood, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Aant Elzinga, “Swedish non-participation in the Antarctic leg of IGY 1957/58,” Berichte zur Polar- und Meeresforschung 560 (2007): 155–57.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Charles Swithinbank chronicled his experiences in the memoirs Vodka on ice: a year with the Russians in Antarctica (Lewes, UK: The Book Guild, 2002), and An alien in Antarctica: reflections upon forty years of exploration and research on the frozen continent (Blacksburg, VA: McDonald and Woodward), 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  23. One American IGY member working in the Antarctic even referred to Robin’s report on the NBSX seismic work as their “Bible.” Simon Naylor, Katrina Dean, and Martin Siegert, “The IGY and the ice sheet: surveying Antarctica,” Journal of Historical Geography 34 (2008): 588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Michael J. Turner, British power and international relations during the 1950s: a tenable position? (Lanham, MD: Lexington, 2009), 293.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2011 Peder Roberts

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roberts, P. (2011). The Cold War Comes to the Coldest Continent. In: The European Antarctic. Palgrave Studies in Cultural and Intellectual History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230337909_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230337909_8

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-29705-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-33790-9

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics