Abstract
The tracks of this chapter have been interestingly forth and back and forth again. When invited to contribute to this collection, I readily agreed – then balked. Richard Schechner has been, in some profound ways, my friend and mentor at the same time that “Richard Schechner” is the set of signatory letters attached to the books that line the shelves of those who profess some “relation” to performance studies. My process of thinking through Richard Schechner’s legacy, and therefore this writing, could not be straightforward. My engagement with Schechner’s thought, his teaching, his ideas, and his example has, for me, been deeply cross-routed, or chiasmatic: the so-called “life of the mind” has been profoundly interlaced with what we often still call “personal life” (as if these things were ever really fully distinguishable). Given that we read in the midst of living in relation, and given that reading and thinking bear relationality and structure modes of belonging beyond the pages (and wages) we “make” as scholars – given these things – thinking back over Schechner’s life work made it impossible for me to fully separate the rubrics: “life” and “work.” Indeed, Schechner’s work invited me, as so much of his writing against the grain of rigid epistemological ruts has done, to critically and creatively jump into the cracks in distinctions – or to weave between them – as “between” theatre and anthropology, or “from ritual to theatre and back” again.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
1. See Lauren Berlant, “Intimacy: Introduction to Intimacy,” Critical Inquiry. Special Issue (Winter, 1998): 281–8.
9. Jacques Rivette, Interview with Jean Renoir, Stage and Screen: Three Films by Jean Renoir. DVD (Criterion) 2004. Schechner, Richard, Essays on Performance Theory. New York: Drama Book Specialists, 1977.
10. See Martin Pucher, Stage Fright: Modernism, Anti-Theatricality, and Drama. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press), 2002.
12. See Stephen J. Bottoms, “The Efficacy/Effeminacy Braid: Unpicking the Performance. Studies/Theatre Studies Dichotomy,” Theatre Topics 13.2 (2003): 173–87.
13. Schechner, “Actuals” 1970: 115–16.
15. Schechner, “Actuals” 1970: 103. This sentence remains unedited across the editions, appearing the same in 2003.
16. Mircea Eliade, Rites and Symbols of Initiation. New York: Harper & Row, 1965, 6.
18. Schechner, Between Theater and Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985, 35–6.
25. Rebecca Schneider, “What I Can’t Recall,” in A Performance Cosmology, ed. Judie Christie, Richard Gough and Daniel Watt. New York: Routledge, 2006.
Naomi Schor, Reading in Detail: Aesthetics and the Feminine. New York: Routledge, 1987.
Rebecca Schneider, “Holly Hughes: Polymorphous Perversity and the Lesbian Scientist,” TDR 33.1 (1989): 171-83.
Calvin Tomkins, The Bride and the Bachelors: Five Masters of the Avant-Garde. New York: Penguin, 1968.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2011 Rebecca Schneider
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schneider, R. (2011). Reactuals: From Personal to Critical and Back. In: Harding, J.M., Rosenthal, C. (eds) The Rise of Performance Studies. Studies in International Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306059_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306059_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31806-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-30605-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Theatre & Performance CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)