Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Economics of Privacy

Book cover The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Abstract

The increasing digitalization of the economy and advances in data processing have drawn economists’ attention to the role of personal data in markets. The economics of privacy aims to analyze how individuals, firms, and policymakers interact in markets where personal data play a key role. The complexity of these markets is challenging for academics who rely on different disciplines and methods to investigate privacy issues, including field experiments. In this article we review this literature, and point out the need to take account of the complex interactions between the different economic agents, and highlight specific strategies regarding privacy issues. First, individuals might face a puzzling tradeoff between sharing data in order to access customized services and, on the other hand, protecting their personal data against potential data misuses. Second, industrial organizations and the literature of marketing study how firms can fit personal data into their strategies; and how this can spur new business models. Third, privacy regulation is being challenged as it aims both at protecting individuals’ privacy while preserving firms’ capacity to innovate. In this context, the main difficulty for policymakers is to shape a clear framework for both individuals and firms. Lastly, we bring attention to the need for further research to investigate the role of privacy as a business differentiator: in other words to establish a clear link between consumers’ demand and firms’ offer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Acquisti, A. 2004. Privacy in electronic commerce and the economics of immediate gratification. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM conference on electronic commerce, 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acquisti, A. 2014. From the economics of privacy to the economics of big data. In Privacy, big data, and the public good: Frameworks for engagement, ed. S. Bender, J. Lane, H. Nissenbaum, and V. Stodden, 76–95. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Acquisti, A., and C. Fong. 2015. An experiment in hiring discrimination via online social networks, WP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acquisti, A., and J. Grossklags. 2005. Privacy and rationality in decision making. IEEE Security & Privacy 3 (1): 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acquisti, A., and H.R. Varian. 2005. Conditioning prices on purchase history. Marketing Science 24 (3): 367–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acquisti, A., L.K. John, and G. Loewenstein. 2012. The impact of relative standards on the propensity to disclose. Journal of Marketing Research 49: 160–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acquisti, A., L.K. John, and G. Loewenstein. 2013. What is privacy worth? The Journal of Legal Studies 42 (2): 249–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acquisti, A., C. Taylor, and L. Wagman. 2016. The economics of privacy. Journal of economic Literature 54 (2): 442–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akçura, M.T., and K. Srinivasan. 2005. Research note: Customer intimacy and cross-selling strategy. Management Science 51 (6): 1007–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M., and J. Zhou. 2010. Conditioning prices on search behaviour, Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper 19985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belleflamme, P., and W. Vergote. 2016. Monopoly price discrimination and privacy: The hidden cost of hiding. Economic Letters 149: 141–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava, S., and G. Loewenstein. 2015. Behavioral economics and public policy 102: Beyond nudging. American Economic Review 105 (5): 396–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, F., and G. Demange. 2016. Taxation and privacy protection on internet platforms, halshs-01381044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J., A. Goldfarb, and C. Tucker. 2015. Privacy regulation and market structure. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 24 (1): 47–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casadesus-Masanell, R., and A. Hervas-Drane. 2015. Competing with privacy. Management Science 61 (1): 229–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chellappa, R.K., and R.G. Sin. 2005. Personalization versus privacy: An empirical examination of the online consumer’s Dilemma. Information Technology and Management 6 (2): 181–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clavorà Braulin, F., and T. Valletti. 2016. Selling customer information to competing firms. Economics Letters 149: 10–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cranor, L.F. 2012. Necessary but not sufficient: Standardized mechanisms for privacy notice and choice. Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law 10: 273–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, B. 2011. Adverse selection in online ‘trust’ certifications and search results. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 10 (1): 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J. 2012. Can privacy be just another good? Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law 10 (2): 251–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, C., A. Ghose, and B. Wiesenfeld. 2008. Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Information Systems Research 19 (3): 291–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D., and J. Tirole. 1998. Upgrades, tradeins, and buybacks. RAND Journal of Economics 29 (2): 235–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, A., and C.E. Tucker. 2011. Privacy regulation and online advertising. Management science 57 (1): 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, A., and C.E. Tucker. 2012a. Privacy and innovation. Innovation policy and the economy 12 (1): 65–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, A., and C.E. Tucker. 2012b. Shifts in privacy concerns. American Economic review 102 (3): 349–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunes, A.P., and M. Stucke. 2015. No mistake about it: The important role of antitrust in the era of big data. The Antitrust Source, April, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. 1980. Privacy: Its origin, function, and future. The Journal of Legal Studies 9 (4): 649–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, C.M., J. McAndrews, and W. Roberds 2000. A theory of transactions privacy. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Working Paper 2000-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosinski, M., D. Stillwell, and T. Graepel. 2013. Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (15): 5802–5805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kummer, M.E., and P. Schulte. 2016. When private information settles the bill: Money and privacy in Google’s market for smartphone applications, ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, 16-031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambrecht, A., and C.E. Tucker. 2013. When does retargeting work? Information specificity in online advertising. Journal of Marketing research 50 (5): 561–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambrecht, A., and C.E. Tucker. 2016. Algorithmic bias? An empirical study into apparent gender-based discrimination in the display of STEM career ads. Social Science Research Network, WP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambrecht, A., A. Goldfarb, A. Bonatti, A. Ghose, D. Goldstein, R. Lewis, A. Rao, N. Sahni, and S. Yao. 2014. How do firms make money selling digital goods online? Marketing Letters 25: 331–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazer, D., A. Pentland, L. Adamic, S. Aral, A.-L. Barabasi, D. Brewer, N. Christakis, N. Contractor, J. Fowler, M. Gutmann, T. Jebara, G. King, M. Macy, D. Roy, and M. Van Alstyne. 2009. Social science: Computational social science. Science 323 (5915): 721–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N.K., S.S. Kim, and J. Agarwal. 2004. Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information Systems Research 15 (4): 336–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manant, M., S. Pajak, and N. Soulié. 2016. Can social media lead to labour market discrimination: A field experiment, WP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marotta-Wurgler, F. 2016. Self-regulation and competition in privacy policies. Journal of Legal Studies 45 (S2): 13–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marreiros, H., M. Tonin, and M. Vlassopoulos 2016. ‘Now that you mention it’: A survey experiment on information, salience and online privacy, CESifo Working Paper No. 5756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marthews, A., and C.E. Tucker. 2015. Government surveillance and internet search behavior. Available at SSRN 2412564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K.D., and P.E. Murphy. 2016. The role of data privacy in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, A.M., and L.F. Cranor. 2008. The cost of reading privacy policies. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society 4 (3): 540–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A.R., and C. Tucker. 2009. Privacy protection and technology diffusion: The case of electronic medical records. Management Science 55 (7): 1077–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A.R., and C. Tucker. 2015. Privacy protection, personalized medicine and genetic testing, WP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morath, F. and J. Münster 2017. Online shopping and platform design with ex ante registration requirements. Management Science, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissenbaum, H. 2004. Privacy as contextual integrity. Washington Law Review 79 (1): 119–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R.A. 1981. The economics of privacy. The American economic review 71 (2): 405–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochelandet, R., and S. Tai. 2016. Do privacy laws affect the location decisions of internet firms? Evidence for privacy havens. European Journal of Law and Economics 42 (2): 339–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H.J., J.S. Milberg, and J.S. Burke. 1996. Information privacy: Measuring individuals’ concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quarterly 20 (2): 167–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H.J., T. Dinev, and H. Xu. 2011. Information privacy research: An interdisciplinary review. MIS Quarterly 35 (4): 989–1015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiekermann, S., A. Acquisti, R. Böhme, and K.L. Hui. 2015. The challenges of personal data markets and privacy. Electronic Markets 25 (2): 161–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G.J. 1980. An introduction to privacy in economics and politics. The Journal of Legal Studies 9 (4): 623–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C.A. 2004. Consumer privacy and the market for customer information. RAND Journal of Economics 35 (4): 631–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, J.Y., S. Egelman, L. Cranor, and A. Acquisti. 2011. The effect of online privacy information on purchasing behavior: An experimental study. Information Systems Research 22 (2): 254–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C.E. 2014. Social networks, personalized advertising, and privacy controls. Journal of Marketing Research 51 (5): 546–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H.R. 1997. Economic aspects of personal privacy. In Privacy and self-regulation in the information age. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villas-Boas, J.M. 1999. Dynamic competition with customer recognition. RAND Journal of Economics 30 (4): 604–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villas-Boas, J.M. 2004. Price cycles in markets with customer recognition. RAND Journal of Economics 35 (3): 486–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westin, A. 1967. Privacy and freedom. New York: Atheneum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wired. 2017. DuckDuckGo hits 10 billion anonymous searches after big 2016. http://www.wired.co.uk/article/duckduckgo-10-billion-searches. Last retrieved 30 Jan 2017.

  • Zyskind, G., O. Nathan, and A. Pentland. 2015. Enigma: Decentralized computation platform with guaranteed privacy. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.03471.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. http://link.springer.com/referencework/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5

    Grazia Cecere, Fabrice Le Guel, Matthieu Manant & Nicolas Soulié

Authors
  1. Grazia Cecere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fabrice Le Guel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthieu Manant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nicolas Soulié
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grazia Cecere .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

    Section Editor information

    1. No affiliation provided

      Catherine Tucker

    Copyright information

    © 2017 The Author(s)

    About this entry

    Cite this entry

    Cecere, G., Le Guel, F., Manant, M., Soulié, N. (2017). The Economics of Privacy. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_3058-1

    Download citation

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_3058-1

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

    • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95121-5

    • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95121-5

    • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

    Publish with us

    Policies and ethics

    Chapter history

    1. Latest

      The Economics of Privacy
      Published:
      07 July 2017

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_3058-2

    2. Original

      The Economics of Privacy
      Published:
      06 April 2017

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_3058-1

    Search

    Navigation