Skip to main content

A Public Administration Perspective on International Organizations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Bureaucracy

Part of the book series: Public Sector Organizations ((PSO))

Abstract

This is a book on international public administration (IPA). The introductory chapter sets the stage by defining international bureaucracy as an object of scientific inquiry. It is explained why it matters, what questions preceding studies on the phenomenon have been raised, and why there is a research gap both from the perspective of Public Administration (PA) and International Relations research. The chapter further introduces the contours of a PA perspective on international organizations as pursued by this book and briefly summarizes the central conceptual perspectives on IPAs as outlined by the volume’s contributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2015). International organizations as orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M., & Coleman, L. (2005). Designing police: Interpol and the study of change in international organizations. International Studies Quarterly, 49(4), 593–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. N., & Finnemore, M. (1999). The politics, power, and pathologies of international organizations. International Organization, 53(4), 699–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics (1st ed.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, M. W., & Ege, J. (2015). The autonomy of international bureaucracies. In S. Kim, S. Ashley, & W. H. Lambright (Eds.), Public administration in the context of global governance (pp. 63–84). Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, M. W., Conceição-Heldt, E. d., & Ege, J. (2015). Autonomiekonzeptionen internationaler Organisationen im Vergleich. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Sonderheft 49, 28–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, M. W. (2015). Die Verwaltungswissenschaft vor der Herausforderung der Denationalisierung. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 56(4), 648–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, M. W., & Knill, C. (Eds.) (2007). Management reforms in international organizations. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beigbeder, Y. (1988). Threats to the International Civil Service—Past pressures and new trends. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, T., Mergenthaler, S., & Rotmann, P. (2011). The new world of UN peace operations: Learning to build peace? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F., & Pattberg, P. H. (Eds.) (2012). Global environmental governance reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F., & Siebenhüner, B. (Eds.) (2009). Managers of global change: The influence of international environmental bureaucracies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, P.-O. (2014). Independent influence of international public administrations: Contours and future directions of an emerging research strand. In S. Kim, S. Ashley, & W. H. Lambright (Eds.), Public administration in the context of global governance (pp. 45–62). Cheltenham, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conceição-Heldt, E. d. (2013). Do agents “Run Amok”? A comparison of agency slack in the EU and US Trade Policy in the Doha Round. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 15(1), 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. W., & Jacobson, H. K. (1973). The anatomy of influence: Decision making in international organization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingwerth, K., Kerwer, D., & Nölke, A. (Eds.) (2009). Die organisierte Welt: Internationale Beziehungen und Organisationsforschung. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhard, S., & Ege, J. (2016). International bureaucracies and their influence on policy-making: A review of empirical evidence. Journal of European Public Policy, 23, 960–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhard, S. (2016). International assistance to police reform: Managing peacebuilding. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ege, J., & Bauer, M. W. (2013). International bureaucracies from a public administration and international relations perspective. In B. Reinalda (Ed.), Routledge handbook of international organization (pp. 135–148). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, K. H. (2014). Time and power in the European Commission. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(3), 577–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanrieder, T. (2014). Gradual change in international organisations: Agency theory and historical institutionalism. Politics, 34(4), 324–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D. G., Lake, D. A., Nielson, D., & Tierney, M. J. (Eds.) (2006). Delegation and agency in international organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heady, F. (1998). Comparative and international public administration: Building intellectual bridges. Public Administration Review, 58(1), 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level governance and European Integration. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central State, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2015). Delegation and pooling in international organizations. The Review of International Organizations, 10(3), 305–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jinnah, S. (2010). Overlap management in the World Trade Organization: Secretariat influence on trade-environment politics. Global Environmental Politics, 10(2), 54–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T. (2013). Looking beyond states: Openings for international bureaucrats to enter the institutio0nal design process. The Review of International Organizations, 8, 499–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T., & Urpelainen, J. (2014). International bureaucrats and the formation of intergovernmental organizations: Institutional design discretion sweetens the pot. International Organization, 68(01), 177–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, H., Peterson, J., Bauer, M. W., Connolly, S., Dehousse, R., Hooghe, L., & Thompson, A. (2013). The European Commission of the twenty-first century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, T., & Trondal, J. (2006). Agenda setting in the European Commission. How the European Commission structures and influences the EU Agenda. In H. C. H. Hofman & A. Tuerk (Eds.), EU administrative governance. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenz, T., Bezuijen, J., Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2015). Patterns of international organization: Task specific vs. general purpose. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Sonderheft 49, 131–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liese, A., & Weinlich, S. (2006). Die Rolle von Verwaltungsstäben in internationalen Organisationen. Lücken, Tücken und Konturen eines (neuen) Forschungsgebiets. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Sonderheft 37, 491–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C., Eckhard, S., & Grohs, S. (2016). Administrative styles in the European Commission and the OSCE-Secretariat: Striking similarities despite different organizational settings. Journal of European Public Policy , 23(7), 1057–1076.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mailick, S. (1970). Introduction. Public Administration Review, 30(3), 206–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (1995). A realist reply. International Security, 20(1), 82–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nay, O. (2012). How do policy ideas spread among international administrations? Policy entrepreneurs and bureaucratic influence in the UN response to AIDS. Journal of Public Policy, 32(01), 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ness, G. D., & Brechin, S. R. (1988). Bridging the gap: International organizations as organizations. International Organization, 42(2), 245–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, E. C., & Jenkins, B. (2005). Policy bureaucracy: Government with a cast of thousands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, E. (2009). The origins of Europe’s new stock markets. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranshofen-Wertheimer, E. F. (1943). International administration: Lessons from the experience of the League of Nations. American Political Science Review, 37(5), 872–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnapp, K.-U. (2004). Ministerialbürokratien in westlichen Demokratien—Eine vergleichende Analyse. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D., & Ladi, S. (2015). Global Public Policy and transnational administration. Public Administration, 93(4), 839–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trondal, J. (2010). An emergent European executive order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trondal, J., Marcussen, M., Larsson, T., & Veggeland, F. (2010). Unpacking international organisations—The dynamics of compound bureaucracies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T. G. (1975). International Bureaucracy: An analysis of the operation of functional and global international secretariats. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y.-C., & Weller, P. (2004). The governance of world trade—International civil servants and GATT/WTO. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zürn, M., Binder, M., & Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012). International authority and its politicization. International Theory, 4(1), 69–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bauer, M.W., Eckhard, S., Ege, J., Knill, C. (2017). A Public Administration Perspective on International Organizations. In: Bauer, M., Knill, C., Eckhard, S. (eds) International Bureaucracy. Public Sector Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94977-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics