Abstract
Since empathy is currently of similar relevance for academics in both the natural sciences and the humanities, the concept forms an exceptional subject for exchange and collaboration between the “two cultures”. However, the concept of empathy carries different meanings across disciplines and was based on opposing paradigms throughout the history. In this introductory chapter, Weigel briefly outlines four constellations that are significant for the diverse cultural and conceptual history of empathy and its related concepts: the discovery of the mirror neurons and empathy research in neuroscience and experimental psychology since 2000; the roots of empathy in the concept of “Einfühlung” from aesthetics around 1900; the conceptual overlap with sympathy in the eighteenth century; and the Christian and pre-modern history of sympathy, compassion, and pathos.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Although scholarship is today segmented in a much more complex and heterogeneous way than portrayed in 1959 in The Two Cultures by Charles Percy Snow (Snow, 1959/2001), it is still separated in research either based on empirical or experimental methods and oriented to findings or historic-hermeneutic approaches occupied with interpretation.
- 2.
For the special problem of interdisciplinary concepts as a new approach in the history of ideas see the e-journal Forum interdisziplinärer Begriffsgeschichte of the Zentrum für Literatur- und Kulturforschung Berlin (Research Center for Literature and Culture).
- 3.
For the role of animation in nineteenth century see Papapetros, 2012.
References
Aristotle (350 BCE/2002). Nicomachean Ethics (J. Sachs, Trans.). Newburyport, MA: Focus Publishing.
Aristotle (335 BCE/2013). Poetics (A. Kenny, Trans., reprint). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aristotle (367–22 BCE/2004). Rhetoric (R. Roberts, Trans.). Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
Auerbach, E. (1941/1967). Passio als Leidenschaft [Passio as passion]. In Gesammelte Aufsätze zur romanischen Philologie [Collected writings on romanist philology] (pp. 161–75). Bern /Munich: Francke.
Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Batson, C. D. (2011). Altruism in humans. New York: Oxford University Press.
Benjamin, W. (1933/1999). On the Mimetic Faculty. In Selected Writings (vol. 2, 1927–34, pp. 720–723, M. Jennings, H. Eiland & G. Smith, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Decety, J., & Meyer, M. (2008). From emotion resonance to empathic understanding: A social developmental neuroscience account. Development and psychopathology, 20(4), 1053–1080.
Decety, J. & Ickes, W. (Eds.) (2011). The Social Neuroscience of Empathy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Decety, J. & Svetlova, M. (2012). Putting together phylogenetic and ontogenetic perspectives on empathy. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, 1–24.
Fleck, L. (1935/1979). The Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact: An Introduction to the Theory of Thought Style and Thought Collective (T. J. Trenn & R. K. Merton, Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M. (1966). Les mots et les choses. Une archéologie des sciences humaines [The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences]. Paris: Gallimard.
Freud, S. (1896/1925). Zur Ätiologie der Hysterie [Aetiology of hysteria]. In Gesammelte Schriften [Collected works] (vol. 1, pp. 404–438, A. Freud et al., Eds.). Leipzig, Vienna, Zürich: Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag.
Gallese, V. (2009). Mirror Neurons, Embodied Simulation, and the Neural Basis of Social Identification. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 19, 519–536.
Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor Cortex. Brain, 119, 593–609.
Hamburger, K. (1985). Das Mitleid [Sympathy]. Stuttgart: Klett Cotta.
Hein, G., Silani, G., Preuschoff, K., Batson, C. D., & Singer, T. (2010). Neural responses to ingroup and outgroup members’ suffering predict individual differences in costly helping. Neuron, 68, 149–160.
Hickok, G. (2009). Eight Problems for the Mirror Neuron Theory of Action Understanding in Monkeys and Humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(7), 1229–1243.
Hume, D. (1738–40/2003). A Treatise of Human Nature. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications.
Lipps, Th. (1907). Das Wissen von fremden Ichen [The knowledge of other Is]. Psychologische Untersuchungen, 1, 694–722.
Müller, E. (2011). Introduction: Interdisciplinary Concepts and their Political Significance. Contributions to the History of Concepts, 6(2), 42–52.
Panksepp, J., & Panksepp, J. (2013). Toward a cross-species understanding of empathy. Trends in Neuroscience, 36(8). doi:10.1016/j.tins.2013.04.009
Papapetros, S. (2012). On the Animation of the Inorganic. Art, Architecture, and the Extension of Life. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Rifkin, J. (2009). The Empathic Civilisation: The Race to Global Consciousness in a World in Crisis. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher Inc.
Riva, F., Triscoli, Ch., Lamm, C., Carnaghi, A., & Silani, G. (2016). Emotional Egocentricity Bias across Life-Span. Frontier in Aging Neuroscience, 8(74). doi:10.3389/fnagi.2016.00074
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131–141.
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2002). Motor and cognitive functions of the ventral premotor cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12, 149–154.
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2006). Mirrors in the Mind. Scientific American, 295(5), 30–37.
Scheler, M. (1923/1954). The Nature of Sympathy (P. Heath, Trans.). Hamden, London: Routledge & Kegan Press.
Singer, T. (2012). The past, present and future of social neuroscience: a European Perspective. Neuroimage, 61, 437–449.
Singer, T. & Klimecki, O. (2014). Empathy and Compassion. Current Biology, 24(18), R875–R878.
Smith, A. (1759/2006). Theory of Moral Sentiments. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications.
Snow, C. P. (1959/2001). The Two Cultures. London: Cambridge University Press.
Spinoza, B. de (1677/1977). Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstata /Ethik nach der geometrischen Methode dargestellt [Ethics presented according to the geometric method]. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam.
Tomasello, M. (1999). The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Umiltà, M. A., Berchio, C., Sestito, M., Freedberg, D., & Gallese, V. (2012). Abstract Art and Cortical Motor Activation: An EEG Study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, b:311. doi10.3389/fnhum.2012.00311
Vischer, F. Th. (1887/1889). Das Symbol [The Symbol]. In F. Th. Vischer (Ed.).. Altes und Neues. Neue Folge [Old and new. New series] (pp. 290–342). Stuttgart: Adolf Bonz.
Vischer, R. (1873/1927). Über das optische Formgefühl [On the optical sense of form]. In Drei Schriften zum ästhetischen Formproblem [Three contributions to the aesthetic problem of form] (pp. 1–44). Halle: Niemeyer.
Vischer, R. (1873/1994). On the Optical Sense of Form. A Contribution to Aesthetics. In H. F. Mallgrave & E. Ikonomou (Eds.). Empathy, Form, and Space. Problems in German Aesthetics, 1873–1893 (pp. 89–123). Santa Monica: Getty Center Publications.
Weigel, S. (2004). Pathos – Passion – Gefühl. Schauplätze affekttheoretischer Verhandlungen in Kultur- und Wissenschaftsgeschichte [Pathos – passion – emotion. Sites of negotiations on affect theory in cultural history and history of science]. In S. Weigel. Literatur als Voraussetzung der Kulturgeschichte. Schauplätze von Shakespeare bis Benjamin [Literature as prerequisite of cultural history. Sites from Shakespeare to Benjamin] (pp. 147–72). Munich: Fink.
Weigel, S. (2012). Mitleid /Compassio. Über Rituale. Diskurse und die Kulturgeschichte des Mitgefühls [Pity /compassio. On rituals. Discourses and the cultural history of sympathy]. In C. Nichols & G. Staupe (Eds.). Die Leidenschaften – Ein Drama in fünf Akten [The passions. A drama in five acts] (pp. 222–28). Göttingen: Wallstein.
Weigel, S. (2016). Embodiment in Simulation Theory and Cultural Science, with Remarks on the Coding-Problem of Neuroscience. In S. Weigel & G. Schabert (Eds.). A Neuro-Psychoanalytical Dialogue for Bridging Freud and the Neurosciences (pp. 47–71). Vienna: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Weigel, S. (2017). The Heterogeneity of Empathy. In: Lux, V., Weigel, S. (eds) Empathy. Palgrave Studies in the Theory and History of Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51299-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51299-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51298-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51299-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)