Abstract
Having established the criteria of a profession and clarified the concept of the regulative ideal of a profession and the associated professional virtues, we are now in a position to apply these concepts to the military. By claiming to be a profession, the military claims special moral permission to perform acts of extreme violence and destruction. Unlike most professionals, military personnel are permitted to kill, to destroy the infrastructure of enemy states, and to endanger the lives of military personnel under their command. If it is a profession, then the military warrants greater moral scrutiny and military personnel can be expected to meet high moral standards. Professional status brings with it special moral permissions but also imposes moral constraints: professionals must guide their actions by the regulative ideal of their profession, and they must respect important broad-based moral standards. Professional special moral permissions to violate ordinary moral standards or to weigh moral values differently within the professional context are only justified if the profession genuinely serves an important human need, and only if the special permissions are necessary to serve that need. Given that the military claims special permissions of a very serious nature, we certainly want it to be a profession governed by high professional standards and professional responsibilities. Without such status the military would be no better than a mercenary army. Is the modern military a legitimate profession?
‘… a true member of the military profession must also be a humanist’.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Richard Gabriel, To Serve With Honor: a Treatise on Military Ethics and the Way of the Soldier ( Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1982 ), p. 85.
Carl Ceulemans, ‘Just Cause’, in Bruno Coppieters and Nick Fotion (eds), Moral Constraints on War: Principles and Cases ( Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2002 ), p. 33.
David Luban, ‘Just War and Human Rights’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 9 (1980): 160–81, p. 168.
Michael Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, 3rd edn ( New York: Basic Books, 2000 ), p. 54.
Michael Walzer, ‘The Moral Standing of States: A Response to Four Critics’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 9 (1980): 209–29, p. 214.
Lance Betros, ‘Political Partisanship and the Military Ethic in America’, Armed Forces and Society, 27 (2001): 501–23, p. 502.
Stefan Sarvas, ‘Professional Soldiers and Politics: A Case of Central and Eastern Europe’, Armed Forces and Society, 26 (1999): 99–118, p. 103.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Jessica Wolfendale
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wolfendale, J. (2007). Professional Ethics and the Military. In: Torture and the Military Profession. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592803_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592803_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28016-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59280-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)