Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2007; 24(8): 483-486
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-986676
© Thieme Medical Publishers

The Outcome and Cumulative Morbidity Associated with the Second and Third Postcesarean Delivery

Ron Gonen1 , 2 , Shlomi Barak1 , 2 , Viki Nissenblat1 , 2 , Gonen Ohel1 , 2
  • 1Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Bnai Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
  • 2Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 September 2007 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome and cumulative morbidity among women who delivered twice after a cesarean delivery (CD), and who underwent in the second delivery either a trial of labor (TOL) or planned cesarean delivery (PCD). Eligible women (N = 399) were divided into two groups based on first post-CD: a TOL (n = 304) or PCD (n = 95). Women attempting a TOL were successful in 70 and 75% in the first and second post-CD, respectively. All participants undergoing a PCD subsequently had a third PCD. The overall morbidity was 8.4 and 5.3% among PCD and TOL groups, respectively (p = 0.258). Women attempting a TOL after a previous CD had a 70 and 53% likelihood for at least one successful or two successful vaginal births in the two subsequent deliveries, respectively. No significant difference was documented between the groups regarding the cumulative morbidity.

KEYWORDS

Planned cesarean delivery - trial of labor after cesarean - repeated cesarean delivery - morbidity

REFERENCES

  • 1 Mozurkewich E L, Hutton E K. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;  183 1187-1197
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt V L, Easterling T R, Martin D P. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with prior cesarean delivery.  N Engl J Med. 2001;  345 3-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 McMahon M J, Luther E R, Bowes W A, Olshan A F. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  335 689-695
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Landon M B, Hauth J C, Leveno K J et al.. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.  N Engl J Med. 2004;  351 2581-2589
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Lynch C M, Kearney R, Turner M J. Maternal morbidity after elective repeat caesarean section after two or more previous procedures.  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;  106 10-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Gilliam M, Rosenberg D, Davis F. The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity.  Obstet Gynecol. 2002;  99 976-980
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ananth C V, Smulian J C, Vintzileos A M. The association of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and abortion: a metaanalysis.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;  177 1071-1078
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Gielchinsky Y, Rojansky N, Fasouliotis S J, Ezra Y. Placenta accreta - summary of 10 years: a survey of 310 cases.  Placenta. 2002;  23 210-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Zorlu C G, Turan C, Isik A Z, Danişman N, Mungan T, Gökmen O. Emergency hysterectomy in modern obstetric practice: changing clinical perspective in time.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;  77 186-190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Rageth C J, Juzi C, Grossenbacher H. Delivery after previous cesarean: A risk evaluation.  Obstet Gynecol. 1999;  93 332-337
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Mankuta D, Leshno M M, Menasche M M, Brezis M M. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: Trial of labor or repeat cesarean section? A decision analysis.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  189 714-719
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Ron GonenM.D. 

Deputy Chairman, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Director of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Bnai Zion Medical Center

47 Golomb Street, Haifa, Israel

      >