The value of endoscopic rectal ultrasound in predicting the lateral clearance and outcome in patients with lower-third rectal adenocarcinoma

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Background and study aims: The aim of this study was to assess whether preoperative endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) is able to predict histological infiltration of the external anal sphincter or the levator ani muscle in patients with a lower-third rectal neoplasm and so the possibility of treatment by sphincter-saving surgery.

Patients and methods: Between May 1996 and May 2003, 66 patients with a lower-third rectal neoplasm that was staged as uT2 or greater were entered into a prospective evaluation of ERUS. All patients underwent neoadjuvant treatment before surgery.

Results: The first ERUS (ERUS 1) was performed before neoadjuvant treatment; the second ERUS (ERUS 2) was performed between the end of the radiotherapy and the surgery. An abdominoperineal resection was performed mainly when the lower extent of the tumor was within 3.5 cm from the anal verge (P = 0.011), but no correlation was observed between the lateral clearance determined by ERUS 1 and the histological clearance (P = 0.091). After neoadjuvant treatment, the ERUS 2 lateral clearance was significantly correlated with the type of surgery (P = 0.003) and the histological clearance (P < 0.001). With regard to the performance of ERUS 2 for predicting histological infiltration of the external anal sphincter or the levator ani muscle, the sensitivity was 100 %, the negative predictive value was 100 %, the specificity was 87 %, and the positive predictive value was 53 %. In a multivariate analysis, the histological clearance and tumor T stage were statistically correlated with disease-free survival (P = 0.035 and P = 0.05, respectively).

Conclusions: ERUS could help oncologists and surgeons in the management of patients with lower rectal carcinomas. Moreover, ERUS is able to predict lateral histological clearance after neoadjuvant treatment.

References

• 1 Bipat S, Glas A S, Slors F J. et al . Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT and MR imaging: a meta-analysis.  Radiology. 2004;  232 773 - 783
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Lahaye M J, Engelen S M, Nelemans P J. et al . Imaging for predicting the risk factors - the circumferential resection clearance and nodal disease - of local recurrence in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.  Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2005;  26 259-268
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Anaes .Choix des thérapeutiques du cancer du rectum. 2005 http://www.anaes.fr 2005
  Google Scholar
• 4 Blomqvist L, Rubio C, Holm T. et al . Rectal adenocarcinoma: assessment of tumour involvement of the lateral resection clearance by MRI of resected specimen.  Br J Radiol. 1999;  72 18-23
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Bissett I P, Fernando C C, Hough D M. et al . Identification of the fascia propria by magnetic resonance imaging and its relevance to preoperative assessment of rectal cancer.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 259-265
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Brown G, Radcliffe A G, Newcombe R G. et al . Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.  Br J Surg. 2003;  90 355-364
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Mathur P, Smith J J, Ramsey C. et al . Comparison of CT and MRI in the pre-operative staging of rectal adenocarcinoma and prediction of circumferential resection clearance involvement by MRI.  Colorectal Dis. 2003;  5 396-401
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon M F. et al . Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection: histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision.  Lancet. 1986;  2 996-999
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F. et al . Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours.  Br J Surg. 1994;  81 1376-1378
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Rouanet P, Fabre J M, Dubois J B. et al . Conservative surgery for low rectal carcinoma after high-dose radiation: functional and oncologic results.  Ann Surg. 1995;  221 67-73
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Gerard J P, Chapet O, Nemoz C. et al . Improved sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer with high-dose preoperative radiotherapy: the Lyon R96 - 02 Randomized Trial.  J Clin Oncol. 2004;  22 2404-2409
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Schiessel R, Novi G, Holzer B. et al . Technique and long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;  48 1858-1865
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Rullier E, Laurent C, Bretagnol F. et al . Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2-cm distal rule.  Ann Surg. 2005;  241 465-469
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Adam I J, Mohamdee M O, Martin I G. et al . Role of circumferential clearance involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer.  Lancet. 1994;  344 707-711
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Nagtegaal I D, Marijnen C A, Kranenbarg E K. et al . Circumferential clearance involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit.  Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;  26 350-357
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Wibe A, Rendedal P R, Svensson E. et al . Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection clearance following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.  Br J Surg. 2002;  89 327-334
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Williams N S, Durdey P, Quircke P. Pre-operative staging of rectal neoplasm and its impact on clinical management.  Br J Surg. 1985;  72 868-874
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Nicholls R J, Maxon A Y, Morson B C. et al . The clinical staging of rectal cancer.  Br J Surg. 1982;  69 404-409
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Maier A G, Kreuzer S H, Herbst F. et al . Transrectal sonography of anal sphincter infiltration in lower rectal carcinoma.  AJR. 2000;  175 735-739
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Holzer B, Urban M, Holbling N. et al . Magnetic resonance imaging predicts sphincter invasion of low rectal cancer and influences selection of operation.  Surgery. 2003;  133 656-661
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

P. Senesse, PhD

Département de Nutrition et Oncologie Digestive

Val d’Aurelle Cancer Institute

Rue de la Croix Verte

34298 Montpellier

Cedex 5

France

Fax: +33-4-67-613729

Email: psenesse@valdorel.fnclcc.fr