Download PDF
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 50(2): 87-91
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-26691
Original Cardiovascular
Original Paper
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Mediastinitis and Cardiac Surgery - an Updated Risk Factor Analysis in 10,373 Consecutive Adult Patients

J.  F.  Gummert1 , M.  J.  Barten1 , C.  Hans1 , M.  Kluge1 , N.  Doll1 , T.  Walther1 , B.  Hentschel2 , D.  V.  Schmitt1 , F.  W.  Mohr1 , A.  Diegeler1
  • 1Klinik für Herzchirurgie GmbH, Universität Leipzig, Herzzentrum Leipzig GmbH and
  • 2Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
Presented at the 3rd meeting of the German, Austrian and Swiss Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, February 9 - 12, 2000, Lucerne, Switzerland
Further Information

Publication History

February 12, 2001

Publication Date:
30 April 2002 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

Background: Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) remains a serious complication after cardiac surgery. New evolving techniques including the utilization of internal mammary arteries (IMA), beating heart procedures, and minimal invasive surgery (MIC) require an updated risk factor analysis to identify high risk patients in order to improve perioperative treatment. Methods: 10,373 consecutive patients receiving cardiac surgery between May 1996 and August 1999 were evaluated: 9,303 underwent full sternotomy whereas a minimally invasive (MIC) approach using partial sternotomy or lateral thoracotomy was used in 1,070 patients. DSWI was defined as the evidence of mediastinitis seen at reoperation along with one or more of the following: positive culture of mediastinal fluid, positive blood culture or temperature higher than 38 °C and/or leukocytosis. Results: The overall incidence of DSWI in the “full sternotomy” group was 1.44 % (134 of 9,303). Univariate risk factor analysis showed a significant influence of IMA use, ICU / IC treatment > 5 days, postoperative ventilator time ≥ 72 h, need for reexploration, diabetes, surgery time ≥ 180 min, assist device implantation (including use of IABP), peripheral vascular disease and increased body mass index. Multivariate analysis identified double IMA, ICU treatment > 5 days, single IMA, diabetes, reexploration and increased body mass as significant risk factors. No mediastinitis was observed in the MIC group. Conclusion: As DSWI is related to sternotomy, a MIC approach should be considered for patients at high risk for DSWI. IMA takedown as a pedicled graft should be especially avoided in patients with diabetes since the risk for postoperative mediastinitis is unacceptably high in this patient group.

Key words

Mediastinitis - Heart surgery - Diabetes - Risk factors

References

  • 1 Baskett R J, MacDougall C E, Ross D B. Is mediastinitis a preventable complication? A 10-year review.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;  67 (2) 462-465
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Munoz P, Menasalvas A, Bernaldo dQ J, Desco M, Vallejo J L, Bouza E. Postsurgical mediasitnitis: a case-control study.  Clin Infect dis. 1997;  25 (5) 1060-1064
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Brown I WJ, Moor G F, Hummel B W, Marshall W GJ, Collins J P. Toward further reducing wound infections in cardiac operations.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;  62 (6) 1783-1789
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Levi N, Olsen P S. Primary closure of deep sternal wound infection following open heart surgery: a safe operation?.  J Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;  41 (2) 241-245
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bitkover C Y, Gardlund B. Mediastinitis after cardiovascular operations: a case-control study of risk factors.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;  65 (1) 36-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Milano C A, Kesler K, Archibald N, Sexton D J, Jones R H. Mediastinitis after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Risk factors and long-term survival.  Circulation. 1995;  92 (8) 2245-2251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Jakob H G, Borneff-Lipp M, Bach A, et al. The endogenous pathway is a major route for deep sternal wound infection.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;  17 (2) 154-160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Spelman D W, Russo P, Harrington G, et al. Risk factors for surgical wound infection and bacteraemia following coronary artery bypass surgery.  Aust N Z J Surg. 2000;  70 (1) 47-51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Zacharias A, Habib R H. Factors predisposing to median sternotomy complications. Deep vs. superficial infection.  Chest. 1996;  110 (5) 1173-1178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Stahle E, Tammelin A, Bergstrom R, Hambreus A, Nystrom S O, Hansson H E. Sternal wound complications - incidence, microbiology and risk factors.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997;  11 (6) 1146-1153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gummert J F, Kluge M, Reißmann E M, Bung J, Mohr F W. Einführung eines komplexen medizinischen Dokumentationssystems am Herzzentrum Leipzig. In: Krian A, Scheld HH (Hrsg) Dokumentationsverfahren in der Herzchirurgie III. Darmstadt; Steinkopff 1998: 99-103
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Tegnell A, Aren C, Ohman L. Coagulase-negative staphylococci and sternal infections after cardiac operation.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;  69 (4) 1104-1109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Grossi E A, Esposito R, Harris L J, et al. Sternal wound infections and use of internal mammary artery grafts.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;  102 (3) 342-346
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Furnary A P, Zerr K J, Grunkemeier G L, Starr A. Continuous intravenous insulin infusion reduces the incidence of deep sternal wound infection in diabetic patients after cardiac surgical procedures.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;  67 (2) 352-360
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Gurevitch J, Paz Y, Shapira I, et al. Routine use of bilateral skeletonized internal mammary arteries for myocardial revascularization.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;  68 (2) 406-411
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Risk factors for deep sternal wound infection after sternotomy.. A prospective, multicenter study (see comments).  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;  111 (6) 1200-1207
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kouchoukos N T, Wareing T H, Murphy S F, Pelate C, Marshall W G. Risks of bilateral internal mammary artery bypass grafting.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;  49 (2) 210-217
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Graeber G M. Harvesting of the internal mammary artery and the healing median sternotomy.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;  53 (1) 7-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Gurevitch J, Kramer A, Locker C, et al. Technical aspects of double-skeletonized internal mammary artery grafting.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;  69 (3) 841-846
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Cohen A J, Lockman J, Lorberboym M, et al. Assessment of sternal vascularity with single photon emission computed tomography after harvesting of the internal thoracic artery.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;  118 (3) 496-502
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Prof. Dr. med. Jan F. Gummert

Klinik für Herzchirurgie, Herzzentrum, Leipzig,
Universität Leipzig

Russenstraße 19

04289 Leipzig

Germany

      >