CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · South Asian J Cancer
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771443
Letter to the Editor

E-Procurement of Medical Laboratory Equipment: Experiences from a Tertiary Care Oncology Center in India

1   Department of Transfusion Medicine, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Chandigarh, Punjab, India
,
Charu Singh
2   Department of Microbiology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Chandigarh, Punjab, India
,
3   Department of Oncopathology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Chandigarh, Punjab, India
,
4   Department of Surgical Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Chandigarh, Punjab, India
› Author Affiliations
Zoom Image
Naveen Bansal

Dear Sir,

Patient outcomes and healthcare delivery are directly linked to the availability of calibrated, well-functioning, and quality laboratory medical equipment.[1] Quality assurance in medical laboratory is also directly dependent upon the equipment.[2] In low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), indiscriminate procurement methods among others are responsible for nonfunctioning of 40 to 70% of the medical equipment.[3] Public procurement amounts to almost 20% of the gross domestic production of India.[4] The Government e Marketplace (GeM) is an online public procurement platform launched in the year 2016 by Government of India with an aim to create a transparent procurement portal for government organizations.[5] GeM has various advantages including (i) ease of purchase, (ii) transparency, and (iii) time bound delivery of goods. However, procurement of medical devices and equipment is a critical issue and has its own challenges.[6] Our hospital is an upcoming government tertiary care oncology center with dedicated departments of oncopathology, transfusion medicine, transplant immunology, and microbiology. All the departments are being equipped with advanced state-of-the art medical equipment. We wish to share the issues identified and their possible solutions based on the experiences of e-procurement of medical laboratory equipment through GeM for our hospital.



Publication History

Article published online:
07 August 2023

© 2023. MedIntel Services Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Diaconu K, Chen YF, Cummins C, Jimenez Moyao G, Manaseki-Holland S, Lilford R. Methods for medical device and equipment procurement and prioritization within low- and middle-income countries: findings of a systematic literature review. Global Health 2017; 13 (01) 59 Published 2017 Aug 18 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-017-0280-2.
  • 2 Garraud O, Schneider T. International collaboration for blood safety: the French-African experience. Transfus Clin Biol 2021; 28 (02) 154-157
  • 3 World Health Organization. Medical Device Regulations: Global Overview and Guiding Principles. Geneva: 2003
  • 4 Mehta PS. Government procurement in India: domestic regulations and trade prospects. Jaipur, India: CUTS international; 2012. . Accessed on June 23, 2023 at: http://www.cuts-citee.org/pdf/Government-Procurement-in-India_Domestic-Regulations-Trade-Prospects.pdf
  • 5 Devendra P. Government E-Marketplace: a gem of an idea. Int J Emerging Technol Innov Res 2019; 6 (04) 192-196
  • 6 Ventola CL. Challenges in evaluating and standardizing medical devices in health care facilities. World Heath Organization, P&T 2008; 33 (06) 348-359
  • 7 Mehra A, Sharma S, Koushal V. Implementation of government e-marketplace in a tertiary care hospital of North India: advantages and challenges. Int J Res Med Sci 2020; 8: 3934-3937
  • 8 Cook DA. A protocol for the measurement of downtime of medical equipment. Br J Radiol 1997; 70: 279-290
  • 9 De Maria C, Díaz Lantada A, Jämsä T, Pecchia L, Ahluwalia A. Biomedical engineering in low- and middle-income settings: analysis of current state, challenges and best practices. Health Technol (Berl) 2022; 12 (03) 643-653