A randomized trial comparing winged versus conventional plastic stents for malignant bile duct strictures

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background and study aims Stent insertion at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an established therapy for managing malignant biliary obstruction. Conventional plastic stents with a tubular design are most commonly used despite limited patency. Plastic stents with a winged design may theoretically increase the duration of stent patency. The aim of this study was to compare stent patency of the winged versus conventional plastic stents in patients with malignant biliary obstruction.

Patients and methods A prospective, randomized subject-blinded trial was conducted. Patients with malignant biliary obstruction were randomized (1:1) to either a 10 French winged stent or 7 or 10 French conventional plastic stent. Strictures greater than 1 cm distal to the hilum were included. Patients were followed clinically to determine the frequency of stent failure until surgery, death or study closure.

Results Fifty-eight patients were enrolled. Following 9 exclusions, 49 patients were randomized to a winged (n = 23) or conventional stent (n = 26). Median time to stent failure was 89 (95 % CI 26-NA) vs 143 (95 % CI 33 – 266) days (P = 0.963) for the winged and conventional group, respectively. Stent failure for the winged group occurred in 11 (48 %) compared to 14 (54 %) in the conventional group. Median survival was 123 (95 % CI 81 – 189) vs 342 days (95 % CI 123 – 704) (p = 0.084) in the winged and conventional group respectively. There were no procedure related adverse events.

Conclusions Improvement in stent patency was not seen with the winged stent when compared to the conventional plastic stent.

Clinical trials number NCT01514214.

• References

• 1 Ballinger AG, McHugh M, Catnach SM. et al. Symptom relief and quality of life after stenting for malignant bile duct obstruction. Gut 1994; 35: 467-470
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Schmassmann A, von Gunten E, Knuchel J. et al. Wallstents versus plastic stents in malignant biliary obstruction: effects of stent patency of the first and second stent on patient compliance and survival. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 654-659
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 van Berkel AM, Boland C, Redekop WK. et al. A prospective randomized trial of Teflon versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 681-686
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Carr-Locke DL, Ball TJ, Brandabur J. et al. Final results of a multi-center randomized trial of endoscopic Wallstent biliary endoprostheses versus plastic stents. World Congresses of Gastroenterology. Los Angeles, CA: 1994: 2513
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Davids PH, Groen AK, Rauws EA. et al. Randomised trial of self-expanding metal stents versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction. Lancet 1992; 340: 1488-1492
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Knyrim K, Wagner HJ, Pausch J. et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of metal stents for malignant obstruction of the common bile duct. Endoscopy 1993; 25: 207-212
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Lammer J, Hausegger KA, Fluckiger F. et al. Common bile duct obstruction due to malignancy: treatment with plastic versus metal stents. Radiology 1996; 201: 167-172
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Prat F, Chapat O, Ducot B. et al. A randomized trial of endoscopic drainage methods for inoperable malignant strictures of the common bile duct. Gastrointest Endoscopy 1998; 47: 1-7
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Raju GS, Sud R, Elfert AA. et al. Biliary drainage by using stents without a central lumen: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 317-320
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Schmidt A, Riecken B, Rische S. et al. Wing-shaped plastic stents vs. self-expandable metal stents for palliative drainage of malignant distal biliary obstruction: a randomized multicenter study. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 430-436
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Khashab MA, Hutfless S, Kim K. et al. A Comparative Evaluation of Early Stent Occlusion Among Biliary Conventional Versus Wing Stents. Digest Dis Sci 2012; 48: 1708-1716
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Krishnamurty DM, Singh V, Lennon AM. et al. A Comparative Evaluation of Stent Malfunction Rates Among Biliary Conventional vs. Wing (Viaduct) Stents. Gastrointest Endoscopy 2009; 69: AB145
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Donelli G, Guaglianone E, Di Rosa R. et al. Plastic biliary stent occlusion: factors involved and possible preventive approaches. Clin Med Res. 2007; 5: 53-60
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Dumonceau JM, Tringali A, Blero D. et al. Biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 277-398
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Levy MJ, Baron TH, Gostout CJ. et al. Palliation of malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction with plastic versus expandable metal stents: An evidence-based approach. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004; 2: 273-285
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Anderson MA, Appalaneni V, Ben-Menachem T. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Standards of Practice Committee. et al. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation and treatment of patients with biliary neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 167-174
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar