Sports Med Int Open 2017; 01(01): E30-E36
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-123695
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Anaerobic Strength and Power in Master Athletes

Jelena Gacesa
1   Laboratory for functional diagnostics, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Novi Sad
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 06 October 2016
revised  29 November 2016

accepted  01 December 2016

Publication Date:
31 January 2017 (online)

Abstract

The study compared anaerobic capacity and power in master athletes of different ages, and correlated 2 different anaerobic tests. The study was conducted on 60 male athletes: group I 30–35 years (n1=35, age 32.23±1.53 y), group II 35–45 years (n2=15, age 39.17±3.60 y), group III above 46 years (n3=10, age 52.13±4.50 y). The Wingate anaerobic test and ergometry of elbow flexors, elbow extensors, and knee extensors were performed. Average peak anaerobic power (PP) in group I was 692.94±216.53 W, in group II 593.40±185.91 W, non-significantly lower by 14.4% (p>0.05). In group III, PP was 381.50±117.62 W, significantly lower by 44.9% when compared with group I (p≤0.001). Ergometry parameter of muscle strength and power showed greater decline with age (up to 32.3%) in comparison with contraction velocity (up to 14.1%). Significant correlation was registered between PP and ergometric parameter power for knee extensors (KE) (PP/KE power: r was 0.59 in group I, 0.85 in group II, and 0.90 in group III, p≤0.05). Master athletes represent an interesting population for studying the chronic effects of physical activity on functional capacity changes during ageing. Strength parameters “age” in different fashion, because the contraction velocity parameter is less influenced than strength by the muscle alterations with increasing age.

 
  • References

  • 1 Aagard P, Suetta C, Caseroti P, Magnusson SP, Kjaer M. Role of the nervous system in sarcopenia and muscle atrophy with aging: strength training as a countermeasure. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2010; 20: 49-64
  • 2 Akkari A, Machin D, Tanaka H. Greater progression of athletic performance in older Masters athletes. Age Ageing 2015; DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afv023.
  • 3 Bar-Or O. The Wingate anaerobic test. An update on methodology, reliability and validity. Sports Med 1987; 4: 381-394
  • 4 Capelli C, Rittweger J, Bruseghini P, Calabria E, Tam E. Maximal aerobic power and anaerobic capacity in cycling across the age spectrum in male master athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 2016; DOI: 10.1007/s00421-016-3396-9.
  • 5 Chamari K, Ahmaidi S, Fabre C, Masse-Biron J, Prefaut CH. Anaerobic and aerobic peak power output and the force-velocity relationship in endurance-trained athletes: effects of aging. Eur J Appl Physiol 1995; 71: 230-234
  • 6 Grassi B, Cerretelli P, Narici MV, Marconi C. Peak anaerobic power in master athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 1991; 62: 394-399
  • 7 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2016 update. Int J Sports Med 2015; 36: 1121-1124
  • 8 Kerksich CM, Roberts MD, Dalbo VJ, Sunderland KL. Intramuscular phosphagen status and the relationship to muscle performance across the age spectrum. Eur J Appl Physiol 2016; 116: 115-127 10.1007/s00421-015-3246-1
  • 9 Korhonen MT, Cristea A, Alen M, Hakkinen K, Sipila S, Mero A, Viitasalo JT, Larsson L, Suominen H. Aging, muscle fiber type, and contractile function in sprint-trained athletes. J Appl Physiol 2006; 101: 906-917
  • 10 Kusy K, Zielinski J. Ageing, aerobic capacity and insulin sensitivity in masters athletes: endurance and speed-power training benefits. Trends Sport Sci 2014; 2: 73-84
  • 11 Larsson L, Grimby G, Karlsson J. Muscle strength and speed of movement in relation to age and muscle morphology. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 1979; 46: 451-456
  • 12 Lazarus NR, Harridge SDR. Inherent ageing in humans: the case for studying master athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2007; 17: 461-463
  • 13 Marsh GD, Paterson DH, Govindasamy D, Cunningham DA. Anaerobic power of the arms and legs of young and older men. Exp Physiol 1999; 84: 589-579
  • 14 Narici MV, Maffulli N. Sarcopenia: characteristics, mechanisms and functional significance. Br Med Bull 2010; 95: 139-159
  • 15 Peiffer J, Abbiss CR, Sultana F, Bernard T, Brisswalter J. Comparison of the influence of age on cycling efficiency and the energy cost of running in well-trained triathletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 2016; 116: 195-201
  • 16 Popadic Gacesa J, Barak O, Grujic N. Maximal anaerobic power test in athletes of different sport disciplines. J Strength Condit Res 2009; 23: 751-755
  • 17 Popadic Gacesa JZ, Nedeljkovic A, Ponorac N, Krulanovic R, Grujic NG. Assessment of elbow extensors endurance in young athletes. Int J Sports Med 2012; 33: 1005-1009
  • 18 Rittweger J, di Prampero PE, Maffulli N, Narici MV. Sprint and endurance power and ageing: an analysis of master athletic world records. Proc R Soc 2009; 276: 683-689
  • 19 Strehler BL. New York: Academic Press; 1962
  • 20 Swank AM, Condra S, Yates JW. Effect of long term tennis participation on aerobic power, body composition, muscular strength flexibility and serum lipids. Sports Med Training Rehab 1998; 8: 99-112
  • 21 Tanaka H, Seals DR. Invited Review: Dynamic exercise performance in Masters athletes: insight into the effects of primary human aging on physiological functional capacity. J Appl Physiol 2003; 95: 2152-2162
  • 22 Tanaka H, Seals DR. Endurance exercise performance in Master athletes: age-associated changes and underlying physiological mechanisms. J Physiol 2008; 586: 55-63