Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2022; 16(03): 606-611
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1736329
Original Article

Bond Strength and Microleakage of a Novel Glass Ionomer Cement Containing Silver Diamine Fluoride

Prim Auychai 
1   Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
,
Nichakorn Khumtrakoon
2   CU Dental Innovation Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
,
Chonticha Jitongart
2   CU Dental Innovation Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
,
Punnamas Daomanee
2   CU Dental Innovation Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
,
Arunee Laiteerapong
3   Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
› Author Affiliations Funding The study was financed by a research grant by the Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives To investigate the shear bond strength and microleakage of glass ionomer cement (GIC) containing silver diamine fluoride (SDF).

Materials and Methods Sound human permanent premolars were divided into the following three groups: 1) GIC (Fuji IX), 2) GICSDF-S: GIC + SDF (Saforide), and 3) GICSDF-T: GIC + SDF (Topamine). Shear bond strength (n = 14/group) was measured using a universal testing machine and compared between groups (one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD, p < 0.05). Microleakage (n = 15/group) at enamel and dentin margins was scored using a stereomicroscope (10x) and compared between groups (Chi-square, p < 0.05).

Results There were significant differences in shear bond strength between the GIC and GICSDF-S groups and between the GIC and GICSDF-T groups. The GIC group had the lowest shear bond strength among the groups; however, there was no significant difference between the GICSDF-S and GICSDF-T groups. The microleakage test results were not significantly different between groups at the enamel margin or dentin margins. Although the GIC group demonstrated a higher dye penetration score at the enamel and dentin margins, the difference was not significant.

Conclusions Within the limitations of this study, we conclude that incorporating SDF into GIC results in higher shear bond strength while not increasing microleakage at the enamel and dentin margins.

Keywords

glass ionomer cement - microleakage - shear bond strength - silver diamine fluoride


Publication History

Article published online:
17 December 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Peres MA, Macpherson LMD, Weyant RJ. et al. Oral diseases: a global public health challenge. Lancet 2019; 394 (10194): 249-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Pitts NB, Zero DT, Marsh PD. et al. Dental caries. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2017; 3 (03) 17030
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 FDI World Dental Association. The Oral Health Atlas. 2nd ed. Accessed August 12, 2020 at: http://www.fdiworldental.org/media/77552/complete_oh_atlas.pdf
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Frencken JE, Leal SC, Navarro MF. Twenty-five-year atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach: a comprehensive overview. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16 (05) 1337-1346
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Smales RJ, Yip HK. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for primary teeth: review of literature. Pediatr Dent 2000; 22 (04) 294-298
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Weerheijm KL, Kreulen CM, de Soet JJ, Groen HJ, van Amerongen WE. Bacterial counts in carious dentine under restorations: 2-year in vivo effects. Caries Res 1999; 33 (02) 130-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Frencken JE, Imazato S, Toi C. et al. Antibacterial effect of chlorhexidine- containing glass ionomer cement in vivo: a pilot study. Caries Res 2007; 41 (02) 102-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Yesilyurt C, Er K, Tasdemir T, Buruk K, Celik D. Antibacterial activity and physical properties of glass-ionomer cements containing antibiotics. Oper Dent 2009; 34 (01) 18-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 de Castilho AR, Duque C, Negrini TdeC. et al. In vitro and in vivo investigation of the biological and mechanical behaviour of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine. J Dent 2013; 41 (02) 155-163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hafshejani TM, Zamanian A, Venugopal JR. et al. Antibacterial glass-ionomer cement restorative materials: A critical review on the current status of extended release formulations. J Control Release 2017; 262: 317-328
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Meneses IHC, Sampaio GAM, Carvalho FG. et al. In vivo biocompatibility, mechanical, and antibacterial properties of cements modified with propolis in different concentrations. Eur J Dent 2020; 14 (01) 77-84
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Nishino M, Yoshida S, Sobue S, Kato J, Nishida M. Effect of topically applied ammoniacal silver fluoride on dental caries in children. J Osaka Univ Dent Sch 1969; 9: 149-155
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Gao SS, Zhao IS, Hiraishi N. et al. Clinical trials of silver diamine fluoride in arresting caries among children: a systematic review. JDR Clin Trans Res 2016; 1 (03) 201-210
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Crystal YO, Niederman R. Evidence-based dentistry update on silver diamine fluoride. Dent Clin North Am 2019; 63 (01) 45-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Puwanawiroj A, Trairatvorakul C, Dasanayake AP, Auychai P. Microtensile bond strength between glass ionomer cement and silver diamine fluoride-treated carious primary dentin. Pediatr Dent 2018; 40 (04) 291-295
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Puangphimolkij T, Jariyamana C, Teeranuwat P. et al. Antibacterial activity, physical properties and fluoride release of a glass ionomer cement containing silver diamine fluoride: abstract number SEA0174. Accessed September 10, 2021 at: https://iadr.abstractarchives.com/abstract/sea-iadr2018-3006784/development-of-a-novel-glass-ionomer-cement-containing-silver-diamine-fluoride
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Krithikadatta J, Gopikrishna V, Datta M. CRIS Guidelines (Checklist for Reporting In-vitro Studies): A concept note on the need for standardized guidelines for improving quality and transparency in reporting in-vitro studies in experimental dental research. J Conserv Dent 2014; 17 (04) 301-304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 ISO/TS 11405:2003 Dental materials—Testing of adhesion to tooth structure. Accessed September 10, 2020 at: https://www.iso.org/standard/31486.html
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33 (01) 159-174
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Nujella BPS, Choudary MT, Reddy SP, Kumar MK, Gopal T. Comparison of shear bond strength of aesthetic restorative materials. Contemp Clin Dent 2012; 3 (01) 22-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Bogra P, Gupta S, Kumar S. Comparative evaluation of microleakage in class II cavities restored with Ceram X and Filtek P-90: An in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent 2012; 3 (01) 9-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999; 27 (02) 89-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Powis DR, Follerås T, Merson SA, Wilson AD. Improved adhesion of a glass ionomer cement to dentin and enamel. J Dent Res 1982; 61 (12) 1416-1422
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Poggio C, Beltrami R, Scribante A, Colombo M, Lombardini M. Effects of dentin surface treatments on shear bond strength of glass-ionomer cements. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2014; 5 (01) 15-22
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Burke FM, Lynch E. Glass polyalkenoate bond strength to dentine after chemomechanical caries removal. J Dent 1994; 22 (05) 283-291
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Fröhlich TT, Rocha RO, Botton G. Does previous application of silver diammine fluoride influence the bond strength of glass ionomer cement and adhesive systems to dentin? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent 2020; 30 (01) 85-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Jiang M, Mei ML, Wong M, Chu CH, Lo E. Influence of silver diamine fluoride treatment on the microtensile bond strength of glass ionomer cement to sound and carious dentin. Oper Dent 2020; 45 (05) E271-E279
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Kidd EA. Microleakage: a review. J Dent 1976; 4 (05) 199-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Delmé KI, Deman PJ, De Bruyne MA, De Moor RJ. Microleakage of four different restorative glass ionomer formulations in class V cavities: Er:YAG laser versus conventional preparation. Photomed Laser Surg 2008; 26 (06) 541-549
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Gorseta K, Glavina D, Skrinjaric I. Influence of ultrasonic excitation and heat application on the microleakage of glass ionomer cements. Aust Dent J 2012; 57 (04) 453-457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Pontes DG, Guedes-Neto MV, Cabral MF, Cohen-Carneiro F. Microleakage evaluation of class V restorations with conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Oral Health Dent Manag 2014; 13 (03) 642-646
    PubMedGoogle Scholar