Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2020; 36(04): 430-446
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714119
Original Article

Ultrasound-Assisted Rhytidectomy Including Sub-SMAS and Subplatysmal Dissection

Richard D. Gentile
1   Department of Facial Plastic Surgery, Gentile Facial Plastic and Aesthetic Laser Center, Youngstown, Ohio
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Energy-based facelifting techniques are a relatively new genre of surgery. In this approach, the energy-based device—whether laser, radiofrequency plasma, or ultrasound—can be used in the superficial plane to elevate skin flaps before performing more traditional facelift techniques involving the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) or platysma. The initial reports of utilizing fiber lasers as surgical tools date back to approximately 2007 and initial lipolasers were used to elevate facial skin flaps. The other energy-based devices were also tested. The author has probably the largest series of energy-based facial rejuvenation procedures, having performed over 3,000 of these procedures. The advantages of laser-assisted rhytidectomy include hemostasis, facilitated dissection in areas hard to elevate conventionally such as nasolabial folds or distal neck and the remodeling and tightening of tissue that results from the activation of the wound healing cascade of neocollagenesis and wound contraction. The author currently has a preference for energy device used during rhytidectomy and it is a high frequency ultrasound energy delivered by a five-ring 2.9- and 3.7-mm probe. The use of the ultrasound dissector in both superficial and deep procedures is highlighted in this article with emphasis on its use for deep cervicoplasty and subplatysmal procedures as well as sub-SMAS elevations of the facial deep plane.

Keywords

rhytidectomy - fiber laser - helium plasma - ultrasound - Vaser


Publication History

Article published online:
31 August 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers
333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

 

  • References

  • 1 Population of the U.S. by Sex and Age 2017. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/241488/population-of-the-us-by-sex-and-age/ . Accessed March 15, 2020
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Arnoczky SP, Aksan A. Thermal modification of connective tissues: basic science considerations and clinical implications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2000; 8 (05) 305-313
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ross EV, Yashar SS, Naseef GS. , et al. A pilot study of in vivo immediate tissue contraction with CO2 skin laser resurfacing in a live farm pig. Dermatol Surg 1999; 25 (11) 851-856
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 le Lous M, Flandin F, Herbage D, Allain JC. Influence of collagen denaturation on the chemorheological properties of skin, assessed by differential scanning calorimetry and hydrothermal isometric tension measurement. Biochim Biophys Acta 1982; 717 (02) 295-300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hsu TS, Kaminer MS. The use of nonablative radiofrequency technology to tighten the lower face and neck. Semin Cutan Med Surg 2003; 22 (02) 115-123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Barton JK, Rollins A, Yazdanfar S, Pfefer TJ, Westphal V, Izatt JA. Photothermal coagulation of blood vessels: a comparison of high-speed optical coherence tomography and numerical modelling. Phys Med Biol 2001; 46 (06) 1665-1678
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Dinh V. Low-Power Laser Therapy. Biomedical Photonics Handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2006: 48.1-48.25
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Lubart R, Friedmann H, Lavie R. , et al. A reasonable mechanism for visible light-induced skin rejuvenation. Lasers Med Sci 2007; 22 (01) 1-3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Pereira AN, Eduardo CdeP, Matson E, Marques MM. Effect of low-power laser irradiation on cell growth and procollagen synthesis of cultured fibroblasts. Lasers Surg Med 2002; 31 (04) 263-267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Rattan SI. Repeated mild heat shock delays ageing in cultured human skin fibroblasts. Biochem Mol Biol Int 1998; 45 (04) 753-759
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Watanabe S. Basics of laser application to dermatology. Arch Dermatol Res 2008; 300 (Suppl. 01) S21-S30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Snoeckx LH, Cornelussen RN, Van Nieuwenhoven FA, Reneman RS, Van Der Vusse GJ. Heat shock proteins and cardiovascular pathophysiology. Physiol Rev 2001; 81 (04) 1461-1497
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ebling R. Wilkinson Textbook of Dermatology. Hoboken, New Jersey: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1992
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Geronemus RG. Fractional photothermolysis: current and future applications. Lasers Surg Med 2006; 38 (03) 169-176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Gilchrest BA. A review of skin ageing and its medical therapy. Br J Dermatol 1996; a 135 (06) 867-875
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Sadick NS. Update on non-ablative light therapy for rejuvenation: a review. Lasers Surg Med 2003; 32 (02) 120-128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Goldberg DJ. Lasers for facial rejuvenation. Am J Clin Dermatol 2003; 4 (04) 225-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Capon A, Mordon S. Can thermal lasers promote skin wound healing?. Am J Clin Dermatol 2003; 4 (01) 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Stadelmann WK, Digenis AG, Tobin GR. Physiology and healing dynamics of chronic cutaneous wounds. Am J Surg 1998; 176 (suppl 2A): 26S-38S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Bowers W, Blaha M, Alkhyyat A. , et al. Artificial human skin: cytokine, prostaglandin, Hsp70 and histological responses to heat exposure. J Dermatol Sci 1999; 20 (03) 172-182
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kovalchin JT, Wang R, Wagh MS, Azoulay J, Sanders M, Chandawarkar RY. In vivo delivery of heat shock protein 70 accelerates wound healing by up-regulating macrophage-mediated phagocytosis. Wound Repair Regen 2006; 14 (02) 129-137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Marshall H, Kind CN. Detection and cellular localization of stress-induced 72 kD heat shock protein in cultured Swiss 3T3 mouse fibroblasts. Toxicol In Vitro 1994; 8 (04) 545-548
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Ohtsuka K, Laszlo A. The relationship between hsp 70 localization and heat resistance. Exp Cell Res 1992; 202 (02) 507-518
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Souil E, Capon A, Mordon S, Dinh-Xuan AT, Polla BS, Bachelet M. Treatment with 815-nm diode laser induces long-lasting expression of 72-kDa heat shock protein in normal rat skin. Br J Dermatol 2001; 144 (02) 260-266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Naitoh M, Hosokawa N, Kubota H. , et al. Upregulation of HSP47 and collagen type III in the dermal fibrotic disease, keloid. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001; 280 (05) 1316-1322
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Tasab M, Jenkinson L, Bulleid NJ. Sequence-specific recognition of collagen triple helices by the collagen-specific molecular chaperone HSP47. J Biol Chem 2002; 277 (38) 35007-35012
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Verrico AK, Haylett AK, Moore JV. In vivo expression of the collagen-related heat shock protein HSP47, following hyperthermia or photodynamic therapy. Lasers Med Sci 2001; 16 (03) 192-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Verrico AK, Moore JV. Expression of the collagen-related heat shock protein HSP47 in fibroblasts treated with hyperthermia or photodynamic therapy. Br J Cancer 1997; 76 (06) 719-724
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Frank S, Oliver L, Lebreton-De Coster C. , et al. Infrared radiation affects the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis in human fibroblasts. J Invest Dermatol 2004; 123 (05) 823-831
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Hirano S, Shelden EA, Gilmont RR. HSP27 regulates fibroblast adhesion, motility, and matrix contraction. Cell Stress Chaperones 2004; 9 (01) 29-37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Farber JL, Rubin E. Pathology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Paul M, Blugerman G, Kreinder M, Mullholand RS. Three dimensional radiofrequency tissue tightening. A proposed mechanism and applications for body contouring. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2011; 35 (01) 87-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Mehta-Ambalal SR. Neocollagenesis and neoelastinogenesis: from the laboratory to the clinic. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2016; 9 (03) 145-151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Greenhalgh DG. The role of apoptosis in wound healing. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 1998; 30 (09) 1019-1030
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 DiPietro LA, Burns AL. , eds. Wound Healing: Methods and Protocols. Methods in Molecular Medicine. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2003
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Mirastschijski U, Haaksma CJ, Tomasek JJ, Agren MS. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor GM 6001 attenuates keratinocyte migration, contraction and myofibroblast formation in skin wounds. Exp Cell Res 2004; 299 (02) 465-475
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Hinz B. Masters and servants of the force: the role of matrix adhesions in myofibroblast force perception and transmission. Eur J Cell Biol 2006; 85 (3-4): 175-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Deodhar AK, Rana RE. Surgical physiology of wound healing: a review. J Postgrad Med 1997; 43 (02) 52-56
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Gentile RD. Smartlifting™—a technological innovation for facial rejuvenation. Cynosure white paper. Available at: http://3te441c5la742885k7f5ybi8.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/smartlipo_triplex_compendium.pdf . Accessed July 1, 2020
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Gentile RD. Smartlifting™—a technological innovation for facial rejuvenation. Lasers Surg Med 2009; 41 (Suppl. 21) 68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Gentile RD. LaserFacialSculpting™ minimally invasive techniques for facial rejuvenation utilizing the Smartlipo™ Nd:YAG Laser. 2010 . Available at: http://3te441c5la742885k7f5ybi8.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/smartlipo_triplex_compendium.pdf . Accessed July 1, 2020
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Gentile RD. SmartLifting fiber laser-assisted facial rejuvenation techniques. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2011; 19 (02) 371-387
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Gentile RD. Laser-assisted neck-lift: high-tech contouring and tightening. Facial Plast Surg 2011; 27 (04) 331-345
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Dibernardo BE. The aging neck: a diagnostic approach to surgical and nonsurgical options. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2013; 15 (02) 56-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Sasaki GH. Early clinical experience with the 1440-nm wavelength internal pulsed laser in facial rejuvenation: two-year follow-up. Clin Plast Surg 2012; 39 (04) 409-417
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Holcomb JD, Turk J, Baek SJ, Rousso DE. Laser-assisted facial contouring using a thermally confined 1444-nm Nd-YAG laser: a new paradigm for facial sculpting and rejuvenation. Facial Plast Surg 2011; 27 (04) 315-330
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Goldman A, Wollina U, de Mundstock EC. Evaluation of tissue tightening by the subdermal Nd: YAG laser-assisted liposuction versus liposuction alone. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2011; 4 (02) 122-128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Sarnoff DS. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a novel 1440nm Nd:YAG laser for neck contouring and skin tightening without liposuction. J Drugs Dermatol 2013; 12 (12) 1382-1388
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Dendle J, Wu DC, Fabi SG, Melo D, Goldman MP. A retrospective evaluation of subsurface monopolar radiofrequency for lifting of the face, neck, and jawline. Dermatol Surg 2016; 42 (11) 1261-1265
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Alster TS, Tanzi E. Improvement of neck and cheek laxity with a nonablative radiofrequency device: a lifting experience. Dermatol Surg 2004; 30 (4 Pt 1): 503-507 (PMID: , discussion 507)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Taub AF, Tucker RD, Palange A. Facial tightening with an advanced 4-MHz monopolar radiofrequency device. J Drugs Dermatol 2012; 11 (11) 1288-1294
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Chipps LK, Bentow J, Prather HB. , et al. Novel nonablative radio-frequency rejuvenation device applied to the neck and jowls: clinical evaluation and 3-dimensional image analysis. J Drugs Dermatol 2013; 12 (11) 1215-1218
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Bogle MA, Ubelhoer N, Weiss RA, Mayoral F, Kaminer MS. Evaluation of the multiple pass, low fluence algorithm for radiofrequency tightening of the lower face. Lasers Surg Med 2007; 39 (03) 210-217
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Keller G. Improving the incidence of facelift hematomas with FaceTite. Presented at: AACD: The Marina Del Rey Meeting; 2019; Marina Del Rey, CA
    PubMedGoogle Scholar