Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Yearb Med Inform 2020; 29(01): 176-183
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1702022
Section 7: Consumer Health Informatics and Education
Synopsis
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

Social Media, Research, and Ethics: Does Participant Willingness Matter?

Findings from the 2020 International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) Yearbook of Medical Informatics, Section on Consumer Health Informatics and Education
Pascal Staccini
1   IRIS Department, Lab RETINES, Faculté de Médecine, Université Côte d’Azur, France
,
Annie Y. S. Lau∗
2   Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Australia
,
Section Editors for the IMIA Yearbook Section on Consumer Health Informatics and Education › Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
21 August 2020 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objective: To summarise the state of the art published in 2019 in consumer health informatics and education, with a special emphasis on “Ethics and Health Informatics”.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of articles published in PubMed using a predefined set of queries, which identified 368 potential articles for review. These articles were screened according to topic relevance and 15 were selected for consideration of best paper candidates, which were then presented to a panel of international experts for full paper review and scoring. The top five papers according to the external reviewers’ ranking were discussed in a consensus meeting. Finally, the paper that received the highest score from four of the five experts was selected as the best paper on social media and ethics for patients and consumers of the year 2019.

Results: Despite using the terms “ethics” and “ethical” in the search query, we retrieved very few articles. The bibliometric analysis identified three major clusters centred on “social”, “health”, and “study”. Among the top five papers, one was a review where the authors identified ethical issues across four areas at the intersection of social media and health: 1) the impact of social networking sites on the doctor-patient relationship; 2) the development of e-health platforms to deliver care; 3) the use of online data and algorithms to inform health research; and 4) the broader public health consequences of widespread social media use. The other papers highlighted ethical concerns in using social media to interact with patients at different phases of a clinical research protocol, such as recruitment phase, participant engagement, data linkage, and detection and monitoring of adverse events.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that most users do not think that using social media for patient monitoring in clinical research, for example using Twitter for clinical trial recruitment, constitutes inappropriate surveillance or a violation of privacy. However, further research is needed to identify whether and how views on ethical concerns differed between social media platforms and across populations.

Keywords

Social media - ethics - research design - privacy - patient selection - bibliometrics
 

  • References

  • 1 Gelinas L, Pierce R, Winkler S, Cohen IG, Lynch HF, Bierer BE. Using Social Media as a Research Recruitment Tool: Ethical Issues and Recommendations. Am J Bioeth 2017; Mar; 17 (03) 3-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Gelinas L, Bierer BE. Social Media as an Ethical Tool for Retention in Clinical Trials. Am J Bioeth 2019; Jan; 19 (06) 62-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Terrasse M, Gorin M, Sisti D. Social Media, E-Health, and Medical Ethics. Hastings Cent Rep 2019; Jan; 49 (01) 24-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hammack CM. Ethical Use of Social Media Data: Beyond the Clinical Context. Hastings Cent Rep 2019; Jan; 49 (01) 40-2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Aria M, Cuccurullo C. Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics 2017; 11 (04) 959-75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Reuter K, Zhu Y, Angyan P, Le N, Merchant AA, Zimmer M. Public Concern About Monitoring Twitter Users and Their Conversations to Recruit for Clinical Trials: Survey Study. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21 (10) e15455
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 O‘Brien EC, Rodriguez AM, Kum HC, Schanberg LE, Fitz-Randolph M, O‘Brien SM. et al. Patient perspectives on the linkage of health data for research: Insights from an online patient community questionnaire. Int J Med Inform 2019; 127: 9-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Pratap A, Allred R, Duffy J, Rivera D, Lee HS, Renn BN. et al. Contemporary Views of Research Participant Willingness to Participate and Share Digital Data in Biomedical Research. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2 (11) e1915717
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Golder S, Scantlebury A, Christmas H. Understanding Public Attitudes Toward Researchers Using Social Media for Detecting and Monitoring Adverse Events Data: Multi Methods Study. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21 (08) e7081
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hokke S, Hackworth NJ, Bennetts SK, Nicholson JM, Keyzer P, Lucke J. et al. Ethical Considerations in Using Social Media to Engage Research Participants: Perspectives of Australian Researchers and Ethics Committee Members. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2020; 15 (1-2): 12-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar