Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Surg J (N Y) 2018; 04(01): e43-e45
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1637008
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Association of ACL Laxity Tests with Arthroscopic Findings in Chronic ACL and PCL Deficient Knees

S. Sazali
1   Department of Arthroscopy and Sports Injury, Hospital Kuala Lumpur Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
,
A. Rusdi
1   Department of Arthroscopy and Sports Injury, Hospital Kuala Lumpur Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
,
H. T. Siti
1   Department of Arthroscopy and Sports Injury, Hospital Kuala Lumpur Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

08 October 2017

29 January 2018

Publication Date:
26 March 2018 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury may be diagnosed by clinical examination and radiological investigation using magnetic resonance imaging or by arthroscopy.1,2 Based on our experience, the ACL tear in concomitant chronic ACL and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) deficient knees may produce knee laxity, which is more difficult to assess on clinical examination, which in turn may affect the management algorithm of the patient. Our hypothesis is that, in a concomitant chronic ACL and PCL injury, posterior capsular contracture and abnormal reattachment of torn ACL will result in less clinical and subjective laxity, preoperatively. The aim of this study is to review a cohort of patients who had undergone PCL reconstructive surgery and compare the preoperative clinical assessments with and without anesthesia with arthroscopic finding of ACL. This is to assess the accuracy and reliability of clinical ACL laxity tests in detecting ACL tear in chronic ACL and PCL injury.

Keywords

chronic ACL and PCL injury - ACL laxity tests - association between ACL laxity tests and arthroscopy findings
 

  • References

  • 1 Kochan A, Markolf KL, More RC. Anterior-posterior stiffness and laxity of the knee after major ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984; 66 (09) 1460-1465
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Scholten RJ. Opstelten W, van der Plas CG, Bijl D, Deville WL, Bouter LM. Accuracy of physical diagnostic tests for assessing ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis. J Fam Pract 2003; 52 (09) 689-694
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Katz JW, Fingeroth RJ. The diagnostic accuracy of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament comparing the Lachman test, the anterior drawer sign, and the pivot shift test in acute and chronic knee injuries. Am J Sports Med 1986; 14 (01) 88-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Tonino AJ, Huy J, Schaafsma J. The diagnostic accuracy of knee testing in the acutely injured knee. Initial examination versus examination under anaesthesia with arthroscopy. Acta Orthop Belg 1986; 52 (04) 479-487
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P. , et al. Development and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29: 600-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Oberlander MA, Shalvoy RM, Hughston JC. The accuracy of the clinical knee examination documented by arthroscopy. A prospective study. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21 (06) 773-778
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar