Methods Inf Med 2008; 47(01): 4-7
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1625125
For Discussion
Schattauer GmbH

Failure to Provide Clinicians Useful IT Systems: Opportunities to Leapfrog Current Technologies

M. J. Ball
1   IBM Research Center for Healthcare Management and Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA
,
J. S. Silva
2   National Cancer Institute, Center for Bioinformatics, Eldersburg, MD, USA
,
S. Bierstock
3   Founder & Principal, Champions in Healthcare, Delray Beach, FL, USA
,
J. V. Douglas
4   Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA
,
A. F. Norcio
5   University of Maryland (UMBC), Department of Information Systems, Baltimore, MD, USA
,
J. Chakraborty
5   University of Maryland (UMBC), Department of Information Systems, Baltimore, MD, USA
,
J. Srini
6   University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, PA, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 January 2018 (online)

Summary

Objective: To discuss why clinical information systems are failing.

Method: Subjectively analyzing the development of clinical IT systems during the last decades.

Results and Conclusions: The challenge is to anticipate what information clinicians need and then deliver it in a way that is tailored for their unique views. Clinicians need workstations that offer the highest level possible of user-determined flexibility and customization. We envision and outline a so-called point of care work station, automatically scaling to the display, hardware capacity, operating system, applications (local or distributed) the user needs and across diverse health IT systems.

 
  • References

  • 1 Institute of Medicine (IOM). Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001
  • 2 iHealthBeat, July 27, 2007. United States Trails Other Countries in Health IT Adoption. www.ihealthbeat.org. Last access December 1, 2007
  • 3 American Hospital Association. 2007 Continued Progress: Hospital Use of Information Technology.
  • 4 Ball MJ, Douglas JV. Human Factors: Changing Systems, Changing Behaviors: Toward Healthe- People. New York: Springer; 2005. pp 60-70.
  • 5 Martin JB. March 29, 2007. Digital Doctoring. Boston Globe. www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped. Last access December 1, 2007
  • 6 Campbell EM, Sitting DF, Ash JS, Guappone KP, Dykstra RH. Types of unintended consequences relation to computerized provider order entry. JAMIA 2006; 13 (05) 547-556.
  • 7 Weiner JP, Kfuri T, Chan K, Fowle JB. June 2007 “e-Iatrogenesis”: The Most Critical Unintended Consequence of CPOE and other HIT. JAMIA 2007; 14 (03) 387-388.
  • 8 Mahotra S, Jordan D, Shortliffe E, Patel VL. Epub 2006 June 9 Workflow modeling in critical care: piecing together your own puzzle. J Biomed Inform 2007; 40 (02) 81-92.
  • 9 Horsky J, Gutnik L, Patel VL. 2006 Technology for emergency care: cognitive and workflow considerations. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006; 344-348.
  • 10 Cohen T, Blatter B, Almedia C, Shortliffe E, Patel V. A cognitive blueprint of collaboration in context: distributed cognition in the psychiatric emergcncy department. Artif Intell Med 2006; 37 (02) 73-83. Epub 2006 May 30.
  • 11 Forrester Research, as reported by Chin T 2003 Doctors outpace consumers in embracing e-technologies. AMNews. www.ama-assn.org/sci-pubs/amnews.
  • 12 PricewaterhouseCoopers research cited on iHealthBeat. 2003 More physicians have highspeed internet access. www.ihealthbeat.org.
  • 13 Egan C. May 11, 2007 Mobile, MD: Wired Doctors Bringing Technology to Treatment. Interview on Manhattan Research survey of 1,353 physicians, Taking the Pulse: US – Physicians and Emerging Information Technologies, published in iHealthBeat. www.ihealthbeat.org.
  • 14 Schuerenberg PK. 2007 Technology integration at the point of care. Health Data Management. www.healthdatamanagement.com/htlm/current/CurrentIssueStory
  • 15 Christensen CM, Raynor ME. The Innovator’s Solution: Creating and Sustaing Successful Growth. Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation; 2003
  • 16 Blois SM. The Physician’s Personal Workstation. MD Computing 1985; 2 (05) 22-26.
  • 17 Bierstock SR. December 6, 2004 “Thoughtflow” versus “Workflow”. For Your Advantage (23). Last access December 1, 2007.
  • 18 Bierstock SR. Physician absorption by technology: the end of the physician adoption issue. Healthcare Informatics 2007 (publication pending).
  • 19 Ball MR, Bierstock SR. Clinician Use of Enabling Technology: The Missing Link. Journal of Healthcare Information Management. 2007 21 (3).
  • 20 E-Health Insider, July 10, 2007 Granger says he is ‘ashamed’ of some systems provided. www.e-health-insider.com/news/item.cfm?ID=2854. Last access December 1, 2007.
  • 21 Silva JS, Ball MJ. The professional workstation as enabler: conference recommendations International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing. Special Issue on The Health Care Professional Workstation 1994; 34: 3-10.
  • 22 Patil RS, Silva JS, Swartout WR. An architecture for a health care provider’s workstation International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing. Special Issue on The Health Care Professional Workstation 1994; 34: 285-299.
  • 23 Norcio AF, Stanley J. Adaptive Human-Computer Interfaces: A Literature Survey and Perspective. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1989; 19 (02) 399-408.
  • 24 Getek R. Adaptive Interfaces Literature Review. Unpublished work done in partial completion of requirements of the doctoral program in the Department of Information Systems, University of Maryland (UMBC). 2007
  • 25 Yeo A. Cultural user interfaces: a silver lining in cultural diversity. SIGCHI Bulletin 1996; 28 (03) 4-7.
  • 26 Lehmann CU, Altuwaijri MM, Li YC, Ball MJ, Haux R. Translational Research in Medical Informatics or from Theory to Practice – A Call for an Applied Informatics Journal. Methods Inf Med 2008; 47: 1-3.