Yearb Med Inform 2017; 26(01): 125-132
DOI: 10.15265/IY-2017-012
Section 5: Decision Support
Survey
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

Advances in Clinical Decision Support: Highlights of Practice and the Literature 2015-2016

R. A. Jenders
1   Center for Biomedical Informatics and Department of Medicine, Charles Drew University, Los Angeles, California, USA
2   Clinical and Translational Science Institute and Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

18 August 2017

Publication Date:
11 September 2017 (online)

Summary

Introduction: Advances in clinical decision support (CDS) continue to evolve to support the goals of clinicians, policymakers, patients and professional organizations to improve clinical practice, patient safety, and the quality of care.

Objectives: Identify key thematic areas or foci in research and practice involving clinical decision support during the 2015-2016 time period.

Methods: Thematic analysis consistent with a grounded theory approach was applied in a targeted review of journal publications, the proceedings of key scientific conferences as well as activities in standards development organizations in order to identify the key themes underlying work related to CDS.

Results: Ten key thematic areas were identified, including: 1) an emphasis on knowledge representation, with a focus on clinical practice guidelines; 2) various aspects of precision medicine, including the use of sensor and genomic data as well as big data; 3) efforts in quality improvement; 4) innovative uses of computer-based provider order entry (CPOE) systems, including relevant data displays; 5) expansion of CDS in various clinical settings; 6) patient-directed CDS; 7) understanding the potential negative impact of CDS; 8) obtaining structured data to drive CDS interventions; 9) the use of diagnostic decision support; and 10) the development and use of standards for CDS.

Conclusions: Active research and practice in 2015-2016 continue to underscore the importance and broad utility of CDS for effecting change and improving the quality and outcome of clinical care.

 
  • References

  • 1 Osheroff JA, Teich JM, Levick D, Saldana L, Velasco F, Sittig D. et al. Improving Outcomes with Clinical Decision Support: An Implementer’s Guide. 2. ed. Chicago: Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society; 2012
  • 2 Sirajuddin AM, Osheroff JA, Sittig DF, Velasco F, Collins DA. Implementation pearls from a new guidebook on improving medication use and outcomes with clinical decision support. Effective CDS is essential for addressing healthcare performance improvement imperatives. J Healthc Inf Manag 2009; 23 (04) 38-45.
  • 3 Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Clinical decision support: more than just ‘alerts’ tipsheet. https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Downloads/ ClinicalDecisionSupport_Tipsheet-.pdf. Accessed 1 November 2016.
  • 4 Medicare and Medicaid Programs - Electronic Health Record Incentive Program. Final rule. Fed Regist 2010; Jul 28; 75 (144) 44314-44588.
  • 5 Jaspers MW, Smeulers M, Vermeulen H, Peute LW. Effects of clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011; 18 (03) 327-34.
  • 6 Korngiebel DM, Thummel KE, Burke W. Implementing precision medicine: the ethical challenges. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2017; 38 (01) 8-14.
  • 7 Bennett P, Hardiker NR. The use of computerized clinical decision support in emergency care: a substantive review of the literature. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; May 1; 24 (03) 655-68.
  • 8 Bousquet J, Hellings PW, Agache I, Bedbrook A, Bachert C, Bergmann KC. et al. ARIA 2016: Care pathways implementing emerging technologies for predictive medicine in rhinitis and asthma across the life cycle. Clin Transl Allergy 2016; 06: 47.
  • 9 Chapman AL, Hadfield M, Chapman CJ. Qualitative research in healthcare: an introduction to grounded theory using thematic analysis. J R Coll Physicians Edinb 2015; 45: 201-5.
  • 10 Bekelis K, McGirt MJ, Parker SL. The present and future of quality measures and public reporting in neurosurgery. Neurosurg Focus 2015; Dec; 39 (06) E3.
  • 11 Yang YT, Thompson BM. Regulatory framework for clinical decision support software: present uncertainty and prospective proposition. J Am Coll Radiol 2015; 12 (07) 672-5.
  • 12 Lewis RJ. The pragmatic clinical trial in a learning health care system. Clin Trials 2016; 13 (05) 484-92.
  • 13 Sim I, Berlin A. A framework for classifying decision support systems. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003; 2003: 599-603.
  • 14 Wright A, Sittig DF, Ash JS, Feblowitz J, Meltzer S, McMullen C. et al. Development and evaluation of a comprehensive clinical decision support taxonomy: comparison of front-end tools in commercial and internally developed electronic health record systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011; May-Jun; 18 (03) 232-242.
  • 15 Streiff MB, Lau BD, Hobson DB, Kraus PS, Shermock KM, Shaffer DL. et al. The Johns Hopkins Venous Thromboembolism Collaborative: multidisciplinary team approach to achieve perfect prophylaxis. J Hosp Med 2016; 11 (Suppl. 02) S8-S14.
  • 16 Watkins K, Wood H, Schneider CR, Clifford R. Effectiveness of implementation strategies for clinical guidelines to community pharmacy: a systematic review. Implement Sci 2015; Oct 29; 10: 151.
  • 17 Dabek FJ, Caban JJ. A k-reversible approach to model clinical trajectories. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2016; 2016: 460-9.
  • 18 DesAutels SJ, Fox ZE, Giuse DA. et al. Using best practices to extract, organize, and reuse embedded decision support content knowledge rules from mature clinical systems. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2017; Feb 10; 2016: 504-13.
  • 19 Sarcevic A, Zhang Z, Marsic I, Burd RS. Checklist as a memory externalization tool during a critical care process. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2016; 2016: 1080-9.
  • 20 Saraiva RM, Bezerra J, Perkusich M, Almeida H, Siebra C. A hybrid approach using case-based reasoning and rule-based reasoning to support cancer diagnosis: a pilot study. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 216: 862-6.
  • 21 Galopin A, Bouaud J, Pereira S, Seroussi B. An ontology-based clinical decision support system for the management of patients with multiple chronic disorders. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 216: 275-9.
  • 22 Li X, Liu H, Mei J, Yu Y, Xie G. Mining temporal and data constraints associated with outcomes for care pathways. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 216: 711-5.
  • 23 Fraccaro P, Brown B, Prosperi M. Development and preliminary validation of a dynamic, patient-tailored method to detect abnormal laboratory test results. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 216: 701-5.
  • 24 Brown B, Peek N, Buchan I. The case for conceptual and computable cross-fertilization between audit and feedback and clinical decision support. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 216: 419-23.
  • 25 Mei J, Liu H, Li X, Xie G, Yu Y. A decision fusion framework for treatment recommendation systems. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 216: 300-4.
  • 26 Bouaud J, Spano JP, Lefranc JP, Cojean-Zelek I, Blaszka-Jaulerry B, Zelek L. et al. Physicians’ attitudes towards the advice of a guideline-based decision support system: a case study with Onco-Doc2 in the management of breast cancer patients. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 216: 264-9.
  • 27 Lambin P, Zindler J, Vanneste BG, De Voorde LV, Eekers D, Compter I. Decision support systems for personalized and participative radiation oncology. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2017; Jan 15; 109: 131-53.
  • 28 Hsiung GE, Abdullah F. Improving surgical care for children through multicenter registries and QI collaboratives. Semin Pediatr Surg 2015; Dec; 24 (06) 295-306.
  • 29 Steinhubl SR, Muse ED, Topol EJ. The emerging field of mobile health. Sci Transl Med 2015; Apr 15; 07 (283) 283rv3.
  • 30 Cheung A, van Velden FH, Lagerburg V, Minderman N. The organizational and clinical impact of integrating bedside equipment to an information system: a systematic literature review of patient data management systems (PDMS). Int J Med Inform 2015; Mar; 84 (03) 155-65.
  • 31 Aczon M, Ledbetter D, Van Ho L, Gunny A, Wetzel R. Deep learning recommendation of treatment from electronic data. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2016; 2016: 5-6.
  • 32 Evans RS, Benuzillo J, Horne BD, Lloyd JF, Bradshaw A, Budge D. et al. Automated identification and predictive tools to help identify high-risk heart failure patients. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2016; 2016: 53-54.
  • 33 Herr TM, Peterson JF, Rasmussen LV, Caraballo PJ. The eMERGE Network. Implementing pharmacogenomic clinical decision support: design and prescriber response in the eMERGE Network. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2016; 2016: 61-62.
  • 34 Menti E, Lanera C, Lorenzoni G, Giachino DF, Marchi M, Gregori D. et al. Bayesian machine learning techniques for revealing complex interactions among genetic and clinical factors in association with extra-intestinal manifestations in IBD patients. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2016; 2016: 884-93.
  • 35 Gerdes M, Reichert F, Nytun JP, Fensli R. Future telehealth and telecare reference design based on iot technologies: from remote monitoring to smart collaborative services with decision support. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 216: 891.
  • 36 Kane-Gill SL, Achanta A, Kellum JA, Handler SM. Clinical decision support for drug related events: Moving towards better prevention. World J Crit Care Med 2016; 05 (04) 204-11.
  • 37 Tan Y, Hu Y, Liu X. Improving drug safety: From adverse drug reaction knowledge discovery to clinical implementation. Methods 2016; Nov 1; 110: 14-25.
  • 38 Suresh S. Big data and predictive analytics: applications in the care of children. Pediatr Clin North Am 2016; Apr; 63 (02) 357-66.
  • 39 Dufendach KR, Eichenberger JA, McPheeters ML, Temple MW, Bhatia HL, Alrifai MW. et al. Core functionality in pediatric electronic health records. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2015. Apr. Report No.: 15-EHC014-EF.
  • 40 Goldzweig CL, Orshansky G, Paige NM, Miake-Lye IM, Beroes JM, Ewing BA. et al. Electronic health record-based interventions for improving appropriate diagnostic imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2015; Apr 21; 162 (08) 557-65.
  • 41 Holstiege J, Mathes T, Pieper D. Effects of computer-aided clinical decision support systems in improving antibiotic prescribing by primary care providers: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; Jan; 22 (01) 236-42.
  • 42 Mozaffar H, Williams R, Cresswell K, Morrison Z, Bates DW, Sheikh A. The evolution of the market for commercial computerized physician order entry and computerized decision support systems for prescribing. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; Mar; 23 (02) 349-55.
  • 43 McCoy AB, Wright A, Sittig DF. Cross-vendor evaluation of key user-defined clinical decision support capabilities: a scenario-based assessment of certified electronic health records with guidelines for future development. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; Sep; 22 (05) 1081-8.
  • 44 Wright A, Hickman TT, McEvoy D, Aaron S, Hussain S, Ramoni R. et al. Analysis of clinical decision support system malfunctions: a case series and survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; Nov; 23 (06) 1068-76.
  • 45 Chen JH, Goldstein MK, Asch SM, Altman RB. Usability of an automated recommender system for clinical order entry. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2016; 2016: 27-8.
  • 46 Simpao AF, Tan JM, Lingappan AM, Gálvez JA, Morgan SE, Krall MA. A systematic review of near real-time and point-of-care clinical decision support in anesthesia information management systems. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Aug 16. [Epub ahead of print].
  • 47 Dunn KLopez, Gephart SM, Raszewski R, Sousa V, Shehorn LE, Abraham J. Integrative review of clinical decision support for registered nurses in acute care settings. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jun 21.
  • 48 O’Connor PJ, Sperl-Hillen JM, Fazio CJ, Averbeck BM, Rank BH, Margolis KL. Outpatient diabetes clinical decision support: current status and future directions. Diabet Med 2016; Jun; 33 (06) 734-41.
  • 49 Lee EK, Liu Y, Pietz FH. A Compartmental model for Zika virus with dynamic human and vector populations. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2016; 2016: 743-52.
  • 50 Ma S, Galatzer-Levy IR, Wang X, Fenyö D, Shalev AY. A first step towards a clinical decision support system for post-traumatic stress disorders. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2016; 2016: 837-43.
  • 51 Zaher NA, Buckingham CD. Moderating the influence of current intention to improve suicide risk prediction. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2016; 2016: 1274-82.
  • 52 Panny AS, Huser V. Text processing of clinical research protocols and informed consents to facilitate tracking of research procedures. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2016; 2016: 1546.
  • 53 Cuggia M, Campillo-GImenez B, Bouzille G, Besana P, Jouini W, Dufour JC. et al. Automatic selection of clinical trials based on a semantic web approach. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 216: 564-8.
  • 54 Blum D, Raj SX, Oberholzer R. Computer-based clinical decision support systems and patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review. Patient 2015; Oct; 08 (05) 397-409.
  • 55 Gallagher J, Rivera R, Chiu A, Tanvir TRoushan, Tanimul GMAhsan, Weng C. et al. The use of a mHealth decision tree support program for epinephrine autoinjector (eai) administration training of adolescents. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2016; 2016: 1399.
  • 56 Thompson JS, Matlock DD, McIlvennan CK, Jenkins AR, Allen LA. Development of a Decision Aid for Patients with Advanced Heart Failure Considering a Destination Therapy Left Ventricular Assist Device. JACC Heart Fail 2015; Dec; 03 (12) 965-76.
  • 57 Sawka AM, Straus S, Rodin G, Tsang RW, Brierley JD, Rotstein L. et al. Exploring the relationship between patients’ information preference style and knowledge acquisition process in a computerized patient decision aid randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2015; 15: 48.
  • 58 Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Beneficiary engagement and incentive models: direct decision support model. Fact sheet 2016-12-08. https://www.cms.gov/Newsroom/MediaReleaseDatabase/Fact-sheets/2016-Fact-sheets-items/2016-12-08.html#_ftn7 Accessed 10 March 2017.
  • 59 Brown CL, Mulcaster HL, Triffitt KL. A systematic review of the types and causes of prescribing errors generated from using computerized provider order entry systems in primary and secondary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Aug 30.
  • 60 Topaz M, Seger DL, Lai K, Wickner PG, Goss F, Dhopeshwarkar N. et al. High override rate for opioid drug-allergy interaction alerts: current trends and recommendations for future. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 216: 242-6.
  • 61 Jafapour B, Abidi SR, Ahmad AM, Abidi SSR. INITIATE: An Intelligent Adaptive Alert Environment. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 216: 285-9.
  • 62 Schreiber R, Gregoire JA, Shaha JE, Shaha SH. Think time: a novel approach to analysis of clinicians’ behavior after reduction of drug-drug interaction alerts. Int J Med Inform 2017; 97: 59-67.
  • 63 Zhou L, Collins S, Morgan SJ, Zafar N, Gesner EJ, Fehrenbach M. et al. A decade of experience in creating and maintaining data elements for structured clinical documentation in EHRs. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2016; 2016: 1293-1302.
  • 64 Zhang Y, Jiang M, Wang J. Semantic role labeling of clinical text: comparing syntactic parsers and features. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2016; 2016: 1283-92.
  • 65 Rahman P, Lai AM, Hebert CL. Parsing complex microbiology data for secondary use. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2016; 2016: 1560.
  • 66 Weitkamp A, Madani S, Rosenbloom TS. Use of an Interface Terminology for Evaluating Terminology Coverage for a Clinical Decision Support System. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2016; 2016: 1636.
  • 67 Collins SA, Gesner E, Morgan S, Mar P, Maviglia S, Colburn D. et al. A practical approach to governance and optimization of structured data elements. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 216: 7-11.
  • 68 Hamilton W, Walter FM, Rubin G, Neal RD. Improving early diagnosis of symptomatic cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2016; 13 (12) 740-9.
  • 69 Besenczi R, Tóth J, Hajdu A. A review on automatic analysis techniques for color fundus photographs. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2016; 14: 371-84.
  • 70 Lieng M, Kuhn B, Rehm G, Guo E, Delplanque JP, Anderson N. et al. An automatic, multi-algorithm approach to classify ventilator waveforms. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2016; 2016: 83-4.
  • 71 Herasevich V, Dziadzko MA, Aakre CA. Evaluation of clinical score calculator programmability within the electronic health record. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2016; 2016: 1426.
  • 72 Huser V, Sastry C, Breymaier M, Idriss A, Cimino JJ. Standardizing data exchange for clinical research protocols and case report forms: An assessment of the suitability of the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) Operational Data Model (ODM). J Biomed Inform 2015; Oct; 57: 88-99.
  • 73 Marco-Ruiz L, Bellika JG. Semantic interoperability in clinical decision support systems: a systematic review. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 216: 958.
  • 74 Jenders RA. Utility of the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standard for representation of non-query data mappings in the Arden Syntax. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2016; 2016: 1449.
  • 75 McCallie Jr DP, Mandel J, Strasberg HR, Narus SP, Shekleton K, Marshall P. Beyond SMART: Remote decision support with CDS Hooks. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2016; 2016: 2121.
  • 76 Koller W, de Bruin JS, Rappelsberger A, Adlassnig KP. Advances In infection surveillance and clinical decision support with fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 216: 295-9.
  • 77 Jenders RA. Utility of Arden Syntax for representation of fuzzy logic in clinical quality measures. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 216: 1096.
  • 78 Jenders RA, Adlassnig KP, Fehre K, Haug P. Evolution of the Arden Syntax: key technical issues from the standards development organization perspective. Artif Intell Med. 2016 Aug 11.
  • 79 Heale BS, Overby CL, Del Fiol G, Rubinstein WS, Maglott DR, Nelson TH. et al. Integrating genomic resources with electronic health records using the HL7 Infobutton standard. Appl Clin Inform 2016; Aug 31; 07 (03) 817-31.
  • 80 Middleton B, Sittig DF, Wright A. Clinical decision support: a 25 year retrospective and a 25 year vision. Yearb Med Inform 2016; (Suppl. 01) S103-S116.
  • 81 Peleg M, Tu S. Decision support, knowledge representation and management in medicine. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (Suppl. 01) S72-80.