Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 21(01): 102-108
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1582266
Systematic Review
Thieme-Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Cochlear Implantation through the Middle Fossa Approach: A Review of Related Temporal Bone Studies and Reported Cases

Juan Carlos Cisneros Lesser
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital das Clínicas, School of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo, HC-FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
2   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación, Mexico City, Mexico
,
Rubens Vuono de Brito Neto
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital das Clínicas, School of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo, HC-FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Graziela de Souza Queiroz Martins
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital das Clínicas, School of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo, HC-FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Ricardo Ferreira Bento
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital das Clínicas, School of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo, HC-FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

12 January 2016

16 February 2016

Publication Date:
08 April 2016 (online)

Abstract

Introduction Middle fossa approach has been suggested as an alternative for patients in whom other routes of electrode insertion are contraindicated. Even though there are temporal bone studies about the feasibility of introducing the cochlear implant through the middle fossa, until now, very few studies have described results when cochlear implant surgery is done through this approach.

Objective The objective of this study is to review a series of temporal bone studies related to cochlear implantation through the middle fossa and the results obtained by different surgical groups after cochlear implantation through this approach.

Data Sources PubMed, MD consult and Ovid-SP databases.

Data Synthesis A total of 8 human cadaveric temporal bone studies and 6 studies reporting cochlear implant surgery through the middle fossa approach met the inclusion criteria. Temporal bone studies show that it is feasible to perform cochlear implantation through this route. So far, only two surgical groups have performed cochlear implantation through the middle fossa with a total of 15 implanted patients. One group entered the cochlea in the most upper part of the basal turn, inserting the implant in the direction of the middle and apical turns; meanwhile, the other group inserted the implant in the apical turn directed in a retrograde fashion to the middle and basal turns. Results obtained in both groups were similar.

Conclusions The middle fossa approach is a good alternative for cochlear implantation when other routes of electrode insertion are contraindicated.

Note

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


 
  • References

  • 1 Wysocki J, Skarzyñski H. Distances between the cochlea and adjacent structures related to cochlear implant surgery. Surg Radiol Anat 1998; 20 (4) 267-271
  • 2 Bento RF, de Brito RV, Sanchez TG. A rapid and safe middle fossa approach to the geniculate ganglion and labyrinthine segment of the facial nerve. Ear Nose Throat J 2002; 81 (5) 320-326
  • 3 Jung SM, Jang JS, Ahn TH. Microanatomical study of the extradural middle fossa approach for preventing cochlear damage. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2004; 36: 353-357
  • 4 Forbes JA, Rivas A, Tsai B , et al. Microsurgical localization of the cochlea in the extended middle fossa approach. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2012; 73 (6) 410-414
  • 5 Anagnostopoulou S, Diamantopoulou P. Topographic relationship between the cochlea and the middle fossa floor: the anatomical basis for an alternative approach to the cochlear turns. Surg Radiol Anat 2004; 26 (2) 82-85
  • 6 Todd NW. Cochlear implantation via the middle fossa: surgical and electrode array considerations. Cochlear Implants Int 2007; 8 (1) 12-28
  • 7 Brito Rd, Bittencourt AG, Tsuji RK, Magnan J, Bento RF. Cochlear implantation through the middle fossa: an anatomic study for a novel technique. Acta Otolaryngol 2013; 133 (9) 905-909
  • 8 Bittencourt AG, Tsuji RK, Tempestini JPR, Jacomo AL, Bento RF, Brito Rd. Cochlear implantation through the middle cranial fossa: a novel approach to access the basal turn of the cochlea. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 79 (2) 158-162
  • 9 Colletti V, Fiorino FG, Carner M, Pacini L. Basal turn cochleostomy via the middle fossa route for cochlear implant insertion. Am J Otol 1998; 19 (6) 778-784
  • 10 Colletti V, Fiorino FG. New window for cochlear implant insertion. Acta Otolaryngol 1999; 119 (2) 214-218
  • 11 Colletti V, Fiorino FG, Saccetto L, Giarbini N, Carner M. Improved auditory performance of cochlear implant patients using the middle fossa approach. Audiology 1999; 38 (4) 225-234
  • 12 Colletti V, Fiorino FG, Carner M, Sacchetto L, Giarbini N. New approach for cochlear implantation: cochleostomy through the middle fossa. Otolaryngol Head Neck 66 Surg 2000; 123 (4) 467-74
  • 13 Bento RF, Bittencourt AG, Goffi-Gomez MV, Samuel P, Tsuji RK, de Brito R. Cochlear implantation via the middle fossa approach: surgical and programming considerations. Otol Neurotol 2012; 33 (9) 1516-1524
  • 14 Leung R, Briggs RJ. Indications for and outcomes of mastoid obliteration in cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2007; 28 (3) 330-334
  • 15 El-Kashlan HK, Arts HA, Telian SA. External auditory canal closure in cochlear implant surgery. Otol Neurotol 2003; 24 (3) 404-408
  • 16 Bento RF, Pirana S, Brito RV, Sanchez TG, Castilho AM, Sweet RC. O papel do acesso via fossa média no tratamento da paralisia facial traumática. Rev Bras Otorinolaringol 2004; 70 (4) 484-493