Transcochlear Approach to Resection of Cerebellopontine Angle Tumors: Patient Selection, Surgical Technique, and Outcomes

Background: The transcochlear approach extends the anterior exposure afforded by the translabyrinthine technique. Although this wider exposure allows improved access to cranial nerves and the brainstem with less retraction on the cerebellum, the classical description involving facial nerve transposition often results in permanent facial paresis. This study discusses the role of the transcochlear approach in resection of cerebellopontine angle tumors including patient selection, surgical technique, and outcomes.

Study Design: Retrospective review.

Methods: This is a retrospective review conducted at a single academic institution. Cases performed by our skull base team (neurotologist and neurosurgeon) between 2000 and 2015 were reviewed. All cases utilizing the transcochlear approach were included. Factors including tumor size, completeness of resection, facial nerve function, post-operative complications, and length of stay were analyzed.

Results: Fourteen cases were included. All of these patients had pre-operative severe hearing loss except for two in which surgery was performed urgently in the setting of hydrocephalus and brainstem compression. Eight out of 14 patients had pre-operative facial paresis. Tumor size ranged from 2.2–7 cm in greatest dimension (mean = 4.56 cm).

All patients underwent a transcochlear approach to and removal of tumor with blind sac of the external auditory canal. In addition, 3 patients underwent an immediate facial nerve to hypoglossal anastomosis.

Post-operatively, patients remained in the hospital for 3–5 days (mean = 4). Of the patients who started out with normal facial nerve function (n = 6), 3 recovered to House-Brackmann scores II or greater. There were no reported CSF leaks requiring hospitalization and 1 abdominal hematoma from fat graft harvest. There was a single mortality reported in the peri-operative period; however, on autopsy the cause of death was unrelated to the surgery itself or any subsequent intracranial event.

Conclusions: As in other surgical approaches destructive to the labyrinth, patients were selected with consideration of their pre-operative hearing status and/or their candidacy for hearing preservation surgery. Patients with pre-operative facial nerve paralysis and hearing loss were deemed particularly appropriate candidates for the transcochlear technique given the additional exposure and the lack of added morbidity. In these cases the surgeon also has the option to perform dynamic facial nerve reanimation at the time of tumor resection.