Changing the Way We Manage Rectal Cancer—Standardizing TME from Open to Robotic (Including Laparoscopic)

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Standardizing total mesorectal excision (TME) has been a topic of interest since 1979 when Professor Richard J. Heald first described TME and a new approach to rectal cancer. The procedure is optimized only if every one of the relevant factors is tackled with precise attention to detail, so that the preoperative, operative, and postoperative practice is standardized completely. The same concept of TME standardization applies today regardless of technique chosen, that is, open laparoscopic, single-incision laparoscopic surgery, or robotic. This article reviews the relevant operative factors in performing a quality TME, looking at both the oncologic and nononcologic advantages and disadvantages. It supports TME as the standard of care in obtaining a negative circumferential margin for mid and lower-third rectal cancers, and discusses the role of tumor-specific mesorectal excision for upper-third rectal cancers. It discusses the new options and challenges each operative technique holds, and identifies the same standardized principles each must obey to provide the highest quality of oncologic resection. The operative documentation of these critical features from diagnostic workup to pathological reporting is also emphasized.

• References

• 1 Heald RJ. A new approach to rectal cancer. Br J Hosp Med 1979; 22 (3) 277-281
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Heald RJ, Ryall RDH. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1986; 1 (8496) 1479-1482
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Heald RJ. The ‘Holy Plane’ of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med 1988; 81 (9) 503-508
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Nogueras JJ. Open low anterior resection. In: Wexner SD, Fleshman JW, Fischer JE, , eds. Master Techniques in General Surgery: Colon and Rectal Surgery: Abdominal Operations. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012: 127-131
  Google Scholar
• 5 Grimm Jr L, Fleshman JW. Modern rectal cancer surgery—total mesorectal excision—the standard of care. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 2013; 24: 125-131
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RDH. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence?. Br J Surg 1982; 69 (10) 613-616
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Arbman G, Nilsson E, Hallböök O, Sjödahl R. Local recurrence following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1996; 83 (3) 375-379
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Köckerling F, Reymond MA, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Dworak O, Hohenberger W. Influence of surgery on metachronous distant metastases and survival in rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16 (1) 324-329
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 MacFarlane JK, Ryall RDH, Heald RJ. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1993; 341 (8843) 457-460
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Bjerkeset T, Edna TH. Rectal cancer: the influence of type of operation on local recurrence and survival. Eur J Surg 1996; 162 (8) 643-648
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Arenas RB, Fichera A, Mhoon D , et al. Total mesorectal excision in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Arch Surg 1998; 133 (6) 608-612
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Bleday R, Garcia-Aguilar J. Surgical treatment of rectal cancer. In: Beck D, Roberts P, Rombeau J, , eds. The ASCRS Manual of Colon and Rectal Surgery. New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media, LLC; 2009: 571-604
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 13 Buunen M, Lange MM, Ditzel M, Kleinrensink GJ, van de Velde CJ, Lange JF. Level of arterial ligation in total mesorectal excision (TME): an anatomical study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24 (11) 1317-1320
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Lange MM, Buunen M, van de Velde CJH, Lange JF. Level of arterial ligation in rectal cancer surgery: low tie preferred over high tie. A review. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51 (7) 1139-1145
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Titu LV, Tweedle E, Rooney PS. High tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in curative surgery for left colonic and rectal cancers: a systematic review. Dig Surg 2008; 25 (2) 148-157
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Malassagne B, Valleur P, Serra J , et al. Relationship of apical lymph node involvement to survival in resected colon carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36 (7) 645-653
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Kim JC, Lee KH, Yu CS , et al. The clinicopathological significance of inferior mesenteric lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004; 30 (3) 271-279
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Brennan DJ, Moynagh M, Brannigan AE, Gleeson F, Rowland M, O'Connell PR. Routine mobilization of the splenic flexure is not necessary during anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50 (3) 302-307 , discussion 307
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Hiranyakas A, Da Silva G, Denoya P, Shawki S, Wexner SD. Colorectal anastomotic stricture: is it associated with inadequate colonic mobilization?. Tech Coloproctol 2013; 17 (4) 371-375
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Bearn P, Heald RJ. Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1994; 81 (8) 1224-1226
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Scott N, Jackson P, al-Jaberi T, Dixon MF, Quirke P, Finan PJ. Total mesorectal excision and local recurrence: a study of tumour spread in the mesorectum distal to rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1995; 82 (8) 1031-1033
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Williams NS, Dixon MF, Johnston D. Reappraisal of the 5 centimetre rule of distal excision for carcinoma of the rectum: a study of distal intramural spread and of patients' survival. Br J Surg 1983; 70 (3) 150-154
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Monson JRT, Weiser MR, Buie WD , et al; Standards Practice Task Force of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56 (5) 535-550
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Wolmark N, Fisher B ; National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project. An analysis of survival and treatment failure following abdominoperineal and sphincter-saving resection in Dukes' B and C rectal carcinoma. A report of the NSABP clinical trials. Ann Surg 1986; 204 (4) 480-489
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Kuvshinoff B, Maghfoor I, Miedema B , et al. Distal margin requirements after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for distal rectal carcinomas: are < or = 1 cm distal margins sufficient?. Ann Surg Oncol 2001; 8 (2) 163-169
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Park IJ, Kim JC. Adequate length of the distal resection margin in rectal cancer: from the oncological point of view. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14 (8) 1331-1337
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P. What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer?. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26 (2) 303-312
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 1986; 2 (8514) 996-999
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Adam IJ, Mohamdee MO, Martin IG , et al. Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Lancet 1994; 344 (8924) 707-711
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CA, Kranenbarg EK, van de Velde CJ, van Krieken JH ; Pathology Review Committee; Cooperative Clinical Investigators. Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol 2002; 26 (3) 350-357
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J , et al; MRC CR07/NCIC-CTG CO16 Trial Investigators; NCRI Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet 2009; 373 (9666) 821-828
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Hall NR, Finan PJ, al-Jaberi T , et al. Circumferential margin involvement after mesorectal excision of rectal cancer with curative intent. Predictor of survival but not local recurrence?. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41 (8) 979-983
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Hainsworth PJ, Egan MJ, Cunliffe WJ. Evaluation of a policy of total mesorectal excision for rectal and rectosigmoid cancers. Br J Surg 1997; 84 (5) 652-656
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Tan WS, Tang CL, Shi L, Eu KW. Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2009; 96 (5) 462-472
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Zaheer S, Pemberton JH, Farouk R, Dozois RR, Wolff BG, Ilstrup D. Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg 1998; 227 (6) 800-811
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Nagpal K, Bennett N. Colorectal surgery and its impact on male sexual function. Curr Urol Rep 2013; 14 (4) 279-284
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Masui H, Ike H, Yamaguchi S, Oki S, Shimada H. Male sexual function after autonomic nerve-preserving operation for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39 (10) 1140-1145
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Bleday R, Brindzei N. Surgical treatment of rectal cancer. In: Beck DE, Roberts PL, Saclarides TJ, , et al., eds. The ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2011: 747-750
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 39 Maurer CA, Z'Graggen K, Renzulli P, Schilling MK, Netzer P, Büchler MW. Total mesorectal excision preserves male genital function compared with conventional rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2001; 88 (11) 1501-1505
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Brown CJ, Fenech DS, McLeod RS. Reconstructive techniques after rectal resection for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (2) CD006040
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Liao C, Gao F, Cao Y, Tan A, Li X, Wu D. Meta-analysis of the colon J-pouch vs transverse coloplasty pouch after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12 (7) 624-631
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Mehrvarz S, Towliat SM, Mohebbi HA, Derakhshani S, Abavisani M. Comparison of colonic J-pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis after low anterior resection. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2013; 15 (1) 32-35
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H , et al. MRC CLASICC trial group. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365: 1718-1726
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2010; 97 (11) 1638-1645
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC , et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 2004; 363 (9416) 1187-1192
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Hartley JE, Mehigan BJ, Qureshi AE, Duthie GS, Lee PW, Monson JR. Total mesorectal excision: assessment of the laparoscopic approach. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44 (3) 315-321
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Bretagnol F, Rullier E, Couderc P, Rullier A, Saric J. Technical and oncological feasibility of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with pouch coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2003; 5 (5) 451-453
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H , et al; UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25 (21) 3061-3068
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Capretti G, Di Carlo V. Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50 (4) 464-471
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Hillingsø JG, Wille-Jørgensen P. Staged or simultaneous resection of synchronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer—a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11 (1) 3-10
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Laurent C, Leblanc F, Wütrich P, Scheffler M, Rullier E. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results. Ann Surg 2009; 250 (1) 54-61
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Nandakumar G, Fleshman JW. Laparoscopy for rectal cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2010; 19 (4) 793-802
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY , et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11 (7) 637-645
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Cuesta MA , et al. Laparoscopic Surgery versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Short-term Outcomes of a Randomized Trial. Viganello-Lugano, Switzerland: European Society of Medical Oncology; 2011. :LBA 2
  Google Scholar
• 55 Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y , et al. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2004; 18 (8) 1211-1215
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP , et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13 (3) 413-424
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Gao F, Cao YF, Chen LS. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006; 21 (7) 652-656
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Breukink S, Pierie J, Wiggers T. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 4 (4) CD005200
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 Vennix S, Pelzers L, Bouvy N , et al. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 4: CD005200
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 60 Strouch MJ, Zhou G, Fleshman JW, Birnbaum EH, Hunt SR, Mutch MG. Time to initiation of postoperative chemotherapy: an outcome measure for patients undergoing laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56 (8) 945-951
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 61 Sourrouille I, Dumont F, Goéré D, Honoré C, Elias D. Resection of rectal cancer via an abdominal single-port access: short-term results and comparison with standard laparoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56 (11) 1203-1210
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS , et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16 (6) 1480-1487
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 63 Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JDI, Ballantyne GH, Paz IB. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2006; 20 (10) 1521-1525
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 64 Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bartoli A, Spaziani A, Biancafarina A, Casciola L. Short- and medium-term outcome of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic rectal resection. JSLS 2009; 13 (2) 176-183
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 65 Luca F, Cenciarelli S, Valvo M , et al. Full robotic left colon and rectal cancer resection: technique and early outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16 (5) 1274-1278
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 66 Scarpinata R, Aly EH. Does robotic rectal cancer surgery offer improved early postoperative outcomes?. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56 (2) 253-262
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 67 Stein SL, Delaney CP. Laparoscopic low anterior resection with transanal anastomosis or colonic J pouch creation. In: Wexner SD, Fleshman JW, Fischer JE, , eds. Master Techniques in General Surgery: Colon and Rectal Surgery: Abdominal Operations. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012: 145-158
  Google Scholar
• 68 Porter GA, O'Keefe GE, Yakimets WW. Inadvertent perforation of the rectum during abdominoperineal resection. Am J Surg 1996; 172 (4) 324-327
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 69 Slanetz Jr CA. The effect of inadvertent intraoperative perforation on survival and recurrence in colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1984; 27 (12) 792-797
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 70 Fleshman J. American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG)-Z6051. A Phase III prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic-assisted resection versus open resection for rectal cancer. Available at: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00726622
  PubMedGoogle Scholar