Diagnosis of bile duct cancer by bile cytology: usefulness of post-brushing biliary lavage fluid

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Background: Pathologic evidence of biliary diseases can be obtained from cytology in addition to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); however, the diagnostic effectiveness is not satisfactory.

Study aim: This retrospective, single-center study evaluated the efficacy of various sampling methods for the cytologic diagnosis of bile duct cancer.

Patients and methods: Biliary samples included bile that was simply aspirated, brush smear, brush-rinsed saline, and post-brushing biliary lavage fluid. A set of samples was compared for cytologic efficacy in 76 patients with surgically proven bile duct cancer and in 50 patients with benign biliary stricture.

Results: The cytologic sensitivity for diagnosing biliary cancer was 34 % with aspirated bile, 32 % with brush smear, 43 % with brush-rinsed saline, and 70 % with post-brushing biliary lavage fluid, in contrast to the null false-positive result in the benign cases. The sensitivity of cytology was significantly higher with post-brushing lavage fluid than with the other three sampling methods (P < 0.0001), and post-brushing lavage fluid improved the cumulative sensitivity by 24 % (P = 0.002). The sensitivity of biliary cytology was also associated with the amount of aspirated bile (P = 0.01) and with the aspiration site (P = 0.03). The rate of cancer positivity in a cytology set differed according to the tumor macroscopic type (85 % in the protruding type vs. 40 % in the flat type; P = 0.003), and according to the size of the cancer (87 % for tumors ≥ 50 mm vs. 66 % for tumors < 50 mm; P = 0.02).

Conclusions: Post-brushing biliary lavage fluid cytology provides superior diagnostic efficacy, and its addition to ERCP procedures is recommended for obtaining cytologic evidence of bile duct cancer.

• References

• 1 Corvera CU, Blumgart LH, Darvishian F et al. Clinical and pathologic features of proximal biliary strictures masquerading as hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 201: 862-869
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Erdogan D, Kloek JJ, ten Kate FJ et al. Immunoglobulin G4-related sclerosing cholangitis in patients resected for presumed malignant bile duct strictures. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 727-734
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Fujita T, Kojima M, Gotohda N et al. Incidence, clinical presentation and pathological features of benign sclerosing cholangitis of unknown origin masquerading as biliary carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2010; 17: 139-146
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Matsubayashi H, Uesaka K, Sugiura T et al. IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis without obvious pancreatic lesion: difficulty in differential diagnosis. J Dig Dis 2014; 15: 394-403
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Farrell RJ, Jain AK, Brandwein SL et al. The combination of stricture dilation, endoscopic needle aspiration, and biliary brushings significantly improves diagnostic yield from malignant bile duct strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 587-594
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Curcio G, Traina M, Mocciaro F et al. Intraductal aspiration: a promising new tissue-sampling technique for the diagnosis of suspected malignant biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 798-804
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Fogel EL, deBellis M, McHenry L et al. Effectiveness of a new long cytology brush in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 71-77
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Jailwala J, Fogel EL, Sherman S et al. Triple-tissue sampling at ERCP in malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 383-390
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Fogel EL, deBellis M, McHenry L et al. Effectiveness of a new long cytology brush in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 71-77
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Ponchon T, Gagnon P, Berger F et al. Value of endobiliary brush cytology and biopsies for the diagnosis of malignant bile duct stenosis: results of a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 565-572
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Mansfield JC, Griffin SM, Wadehra V et al. A prospective evaluation of cytology from biliary strictures. Gut 1997; 40: 671-677
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Sugiyama M, Atomi Y, Wada N et al. Endoscopic transpapillary bile duct biopsy without sphincterotomy for diagnosing biliary strictures: a prospective comparative study with bile and brush cytology. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 465-467
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Okazaki K, Kawa S, Kamisawa T et al. Clinical diagnostic criteria of autoimmune pancreatitis: revised proposal. J Gastroenterol 2006; 41: 626-631
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Ohara H. Clinical diagnostic criteria of IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis 2012. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2012; 19: 536-542
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Selvaggi SM. Biliary brushing cytology. Cytopathology 2004; 15: 74-79
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Waugh MS, Guy CD, Maygarden SJ et al. Use of the ThinPrep method in bile duct brushings: analysis of morphologic parameters associated with malignancy and determination of interobserver reliability. Diagn Cytopathol 2008; 36: 651-656
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Japanese Society of Biliary Surgery. Classification of biliary tract carcinoma. 2nd. English edn. Tokyo, Japan: Kanehara; 2004
  Google Scholar
• 18 Darragh TM, Winkler B, Souers RJ et al. Room for improvement: initial experience with anal cytology: observations from the College of American Pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in nongynecologic cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2013; 137: 1550-1554
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Raitanen MP, Aine R, Rintala E et al. Differences between local and review urinary cytology in diagnosis of bladder cancer. An interobserver multicenter analysis. Eur Urol 2002; 41: 284-289
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Kummerlin IP, Smedts F, ten Kate FJ et al. Cytological punctures in the diagnosis of renal tumours: a study on accuracy and reproducibility. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 187-195
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Harewood GC, Baron TH, Stadheim LM et al. Prospective, blinded assessment of factors influencing the accuracy of biliary cytology interpretation. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 1464-1469
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Schlemper RJ, Itabashi M, Kato Y et al. Differences in diagnostic criteria for gastric carcinoma between Japanese and Western pathologists. Lancet 1997; 349: 1725-1729
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 2000; 47: 251-255
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Ylagan LR, Liu LH, Maluf HM. Endoscopic bile duct brushing of malignant pancreatic biliary strictures: retrospective study with comparison of conventional smear and ThinPrep techniques. Diagn Cytopathol 2003; 28: 196-204
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Krishnamurthy S, Katz RL, Shumate A et al. DNA image analysis combined with routine cytology improves diagnostic sensitivity of common bile duct brushing. Cancer 2001; 93: 229-235
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Kipp BR, Stadheim LM, Halling SA et al. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 16751681
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Ito H, Satoh K, Hamada S et al. The evaluation of MSX2 mRNA expression level in biliary brush cytological specimens. Anticancer Res 2011; 31: 1011-1017
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Chadwick BE. Beyond cytomorphology: expanding the diagnostic potential for biliary cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 2012; 40: 536-54129
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Farrell RJ, Jain AK, Brandwein SL et al. The combination of stricture dilation, endoscopic needle aspiration, and biliary brushings significantly improves diagnostic yield from malignant bile duct strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 587-594
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Ebata T, Watanabe H, Ajioka Y et al. Pathological appraisal of lines of resection for bile duct carcinoma. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 1260-1267
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Igami T, Nagino M, Oda K et al. Clinicopathologic study of cholangiocarcinoma with superficial spread. Ann Surg 2009; 249: 296-302
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar