Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Along with Mechanical Thromboaspiration versus Anticoagulation Alone in the Management of Lower Limb Deep Venous Thrombosis—A Comparative Study

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) with assisted mechanical thrombolysis is now considered as the standard of medical care for deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The study was conducted to describe the immediate and long-term (6 months) safety and effectiveness of CDT in patient with lower limb DVT compared with the routine anticoagulation alone. All 12 to 85 years old patients with recent (0–8 weeks) DVT were included. In CDT group, thrombus was aspirated mechanically and streptokinase (STK) was given along with unfractionated heparin (UFH). After 6 months, deep venous patency and postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) was assessed by using duplex ultrasound and Villalta scale, respectively. Among 51 patients with completed data, 25 patients were allocated additional CDT given for a mean duration of 108 ± 32 hours and 26 patients were allocated standard treatment alone. Grade III (complete) lysis was achieved in 37% patients and grade II (50–90%) lysis in 63% of patients. Patients with partial lysis underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and/or venous stenting. After 6 months, iliofemoral patency was found in 20 (80%) in the CDT group versus 7 (23%) in anticoagulation alone group (p < 0.01). PTS was seen in 5 (20%) in the CDT group versus 19 (77%) in anticoagulation alone group (p < 0.01). We conclude that CDT and conventional manual aspiration thrombectomy are an effective treatment for lower extremity DVT. STK infusion can be safely given up to 6 days. As addition of UFH can cause thrombocytopenia, so daily monitoring of complete blood counts is needed during CDT.

• References

• 1 Jaff MR, McMurtry MS, Archer SL , et al; American Heart Association Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation; American Heart Association Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; American Heart Association Council on Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology. Management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism, iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011; 123 (16) 1788-1830
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Cohen AT, Agnelli G, Anderson FA , et al; VTE Impact Assessment Group in Europe (VITAE). Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Europe. The number of VTE events and associated morbidity and mortality. Thromb Haemost 2007; 98 (4) 756-764
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Hirsh J, Hoak J. Management of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. A statement for healthcare professionals. Council on Thrombosis (in consultation with the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology), American Heart Association. Circulation 1996; 93 (12) 2212-2245
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Gauci BN, Powell JT, Hunt BJ , et al. The feasibility of catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute deep vein thrombosis: a regional perspective. Phlebology 2011; 26 (3) 94-101
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Lin PH, Ochoa LN, Duffy P. Catheter-directed thrombectomy and thrombolysis for symptomatic lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis: review of current interventional treatment strategies. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 2010; 22 (3) 152-163
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Prins MH , et al. Below-knee elastic compression stockings to prevent the post-thrombotic syndrome: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141 (4) 249-256
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Comerota AJ. The ATTRACT trial: rationale for early intervention for iliofemoral DVT. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 2009; 21 (4) 221-224 , quiz 224–225
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Comerota AJ, Paolini D. Treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis: a strategy of thrombus removal. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 33 (3) 351-360 , discussion 361–362
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Patterson BO, Hinchliffe R, Loftus IM, Thompson MM, Holt PJ. Indications for catheter-directed thrombolysis in the management of acute proximal deep venous thrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2010; 30 (4) 669-674
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Enden T, Kløw NE, Sandvik L , et al. Catheter-directed thrombolysis vs. anticoagulant therapy alone in deep vein thrombosis: results of an open randomized, controlled trial reporting on short-term patency. J Thromb Haemost 2009; 7 (8) 1268-1275
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Elsharawy M, Elzayat E. Early results of thrombolysis vs anticoagulation in iliofemoral venous thrombosis. A randomised clinical trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002; 24 (3) 209-214
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Enden T, Haig Y, Kløw NE , et al; CaVenT Study Group. Long-term outcome after additional catheter-directed thrombolysis versus standard treatment for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (the CaVenT study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 379 (9810) 31-38
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Enden T, Haig Y, Kløw NE , et al. CaVenT Study Group. Long-term outcome after additional catheter-directed thrombolysis versus standard treatment for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (the CaVenT study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 379 (9810) 31-38
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Kearon C, Kahn SR, Agnelli G, Goldhaber S, Raskob GE, Comerota AJ ; American College of Chest Physicians. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133 (6, Suppl): 454S-545S
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Mewissen MW, Seabrook GR, Meissner MH, Cynamon J, Labropoulos N, Haughton SH. Catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: report of a national multicenter registry. Radiology 1999; 211 (1) 39-49
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Kahn SR. Measurement properties of the Villalta scale to define and classify the severity of the post-thrombotic syndrome. J Thromb Haemost 2009; 7 (5) 884-888
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Broholm R, Sillesen H, Damsgaard MT , et al. Postthrombotic syndrome and quality of life in patients with iliofemoral venous thrombosis treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54 (6, Suppl): 18S-25S
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Grewal NK, Martinez JT, Andrews L, Comerota AJ. Quantity of clot lysed after catheter-directed thrombolysis for iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis correlates with postthrombotic morbidity. J Vasc Surg 2010; 51 (5) 1209-1214
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Pianta MJ, Thomson KR. Catheter-directed thrombolysis of lower limb thrombosis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011; 34 (1) 25-36
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Meissner MH, Wakefield TW, Ascher E , et al. Acute venous disease: venous thrombosis and venous trauma. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46 (Suppl S): 25S-53S
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Lin PH, Zhou W, Dardik A , et al. Catheter-direct thrombolysis versus pharmacomechanical thrombectomy for treatment of symptomatic lower extremity deep venous thrombosis. Am J Surg 2006; 192 (6) 782-788
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Patel NH, Stookey KR, Ketcham DB, Cragg AH. Endovascular management of acute extensive iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis caused by May-Thurner syndrome. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000; 11 (10) 1297-1302
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Goldhaber SZ, Hirsch DR, MacDougall RC, Polak JF, Creager MA. Bolus recombinant urokinase versus heparin in deep venous thrombosis: a randomized controlled trial. Am Heart J 1996; 132 (2 Pt 1) 314-318
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Schweizer J, Kirch W, Koch R , et al. Short- and long-term results after thrombolytic treatment of deep venous thrombosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36 (4) 1336-1343
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar